‘Conspiracy theorists’ sane, government dupes crazy and hostile

When given a choice between reading a study, and letting someone tell you what a study says, truthers choose whatever supports their big picture best. Of course, if you read the study you'd already know that.

 

after all that buildup and drama we just knew it was going to be a dud

 

What drama? You didn't read the study your link references. Its more of a comedy than a drama.

 

you were going to tell us all about it! lots of drama! suspense! thriller! now this dud!

so (*)(*)(*)(*)ing predictable.

 

Looks like you read my posts like you read the study, that is to say not at all.

 

would melting of the steel floors cause inward bowing?

 

no......................

 

So no planes hit? How many people were in on it?

 

irrelevant, this is about you proving those cgi planes are real. good luck with that.

 

Actually, this thread is about a study you didn't read.

 

i dont see any evidence of that

 

WRONG.

if the floors melted, they would sag and pull the sides of the building inwards.

which is exactly what happened on 9-11.

 

more funny (*)(*)(*)(*)




you see they treat you like a mushroom and keep you in the dark and feed you (*)(*)(*)(*). a physics education is invaluable if you want to argue wtc.

Ok here is a hint.

if it does not have the strength to hold hold itself up but somehow can at the same time get several times stronger than its original strength and pull in the sides. thats classic orwellian double think

 

Why is the op desperately trying to derail his own thread about a study he didn't read?

 

there I fixed the gif so its a little easier to understand

the other one will be deleted.






you see they treat you like a mushroom and keep you in the dark and feed you (*)(*)(*)(*). a physics education is invaluable if you want to argue wtc.

Ok here is a hint.

if it does not have the strength to hold hold itself up but somehow can at the same time get several times stronger than its original strength and pull in the sides. thats classic orwellian double think







oh and fang, now you bore me, enjoy

 

If your own thread topic bores you maybe you should have read it before you posted it.

 

your cat n mouse tactics bore me to tears, unless you have a point I am done with YOU not the topic.

 

Do you really have that much of a problem comprehending what others write?

I said that I was not in NYC on 9/11 so I do not know what happened. Do your controllers have the technology to fool you into believing fantasy rather than fact? Indeed they do. They have the technology. Why should I believe anything they say if I don't see it with my own eyes and understand it in my mind? They (news reporters) have been lying to us for nearly a century. Why should I believe them now? Question authority I always say.

 

Questioning authority is one thing. But living in a fantasy land isn't. People I personally know saw the planes fly into buildings. Their description match the videos and the live TV I saw of the second plane going into the towers. Someone I know died that day who got on one of those planes. So while questioning authority is fine, questioning reality isn't. So I will ask again, are my friends, world wide media and virtually the entire rational world in on it. I don't have controllers, what I do have is a brain and I have been trained in logic. So if you can answer that question fine. To say you don't know what happened in New York because you didn't see it means you must believe nothing outside of your own experience. That is a mental illness and you should get help.

 

Really?...Any 'evidence' any of them were lying on 9/11?

 

yeh sure!
I have an aunt who has a brother who has a 2nd cousin whos uncle finny saw it too!
shees. PROVE IT!

well post which version you saw and I will show you why you did not. LMAO

 

You know what is wrong with these truthers....they are emotionally tied into their fantasy because they lack anything that rises to be described a real life. Virtually all of them are failures in their chosen field, do not have a love life of any value and hate themselves unless they can call someone stupid. It is a form of mental illness.

But here is the thing. if you think that planes were not flown into the building where are the missing people.

 

you have to first prove there was a plane before you can have missing people.

thats ok, no one has been able to prove they saw a plane to date.

since you wont give me the clip that matches the plane you claim to have seen I have no choice but to conclude you seen none.

or this one maybe. pure cgi!



just look at that explosion before any fuel hits the wtc in the rubber band nosed plane LMAO

they forgot to add wings but who is sweating the small (*)(*)(*)(*) eh? LOL

 

Koko derailed his own thread. Classic.

 

So your point is that world wide media were all in on a conspiracy to take down the trade center buildings by faking with CGI planes flying into buildings. Then about 1000 people who claimed to see planes were all paid to say that on television. Then of course someone spread plane parts all over southern Manhattan how many people did it take? 100? Then of course there needed to be a way to bring the buildings down. Again without any evidence that it wasn't exactly how NIST reported, there must have been some powerful people and spectacular technology to do it.
So what you are claiming that 1000s of people conspired to fool the world, made people disappear, including a person I knew, and you want me to post very well known video so you can pretend they are fake. I really want you to set your failed ego aside and try to explain this.