Students with no lunch credit told to throw lunches away>>MOD WARNING<<

Discussion in 'United States' started by Marine1, Jan 31, 2014.

  1. Marine1

    Marine1 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2011
    Messages:
    31,883
    Likes Received:
    3,625
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    MOD WARNING

    You just can't make crap like this up. This is even worse than a school taking a girl's turkey and cheese sandwich away because it wasn't nutritious enough and gave her chicken nuggets and charged her parents for it. To shame these kids and make them throw their school lunch away is insane. I am beginning to think that people have lost all common sense.

    ATTLEBORO, Mass. (MyFoxBoston.com) -- Students at Robert J. Coelho Middle School in Attleboro were told to throw their school lunches away if they didn't have lunch credit.

    School officials told FOX 25 that employees of the school lunch vendor, Whitsons School Nutrition, denied lunches to students with outstanding balances or forced them to throw their lunches away over the last two weeks.

    One fifth grader tells FOX 25 she was told to throw out her lunch before she could even take a bite.

    "They told me to throw it away because I didn't have enough money in my account," says Victoria Greaves.

    Greaves' father, John, said he has never had an issue, but this incident was enough to make him angry.

    Coelho Middle School Principal Andy Boles told FOX 25 that he became aware of the situation at about 4:30 p.m. Tuesday after an angry parent contacted him. He immediately launched an investigation.

    Boles said that Whitsons told him about deficient accounts at the beginning of the year and offered to pass along a statement to parents. Boles said the company never gave him the statement.

    The principal also said the school his taking corrective action and that he has met with at least 15 upset students, as well as the cafeteria workers responsible.

    "They apologized for their actions," says Boles of the cafeteria workers. "Their intent was not to humiliate or upset the students, which I stated to them they had done."

    In a statement to FOX 25, Whitsons said that they regret how their employees handled the situation.

    "We regret that these students were denied meals and agree that this situation should have been handled differently," said Whitsons. "We apologize to the students and the community for this incident and are conducting a full investigation."

    Boles said it was "unacceptable" that any student go without a lunch.

    Whitsons said they are working on a policy to handle future unpaid debt and said that no child will go without a meal in the meantime, regardless of outstanding balances.

    The superintendent tells FOX 25 she has placed the on-site director on administrative leave as the investigation continues.

    Read more: http://www.myfoxboston.com/story/21...rders-others-to-throw-lunch-out#ixzz2rx6101ID
     
  2. RP12

    RP12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2011
    Messages:
    48,878
    Likes Received:
    11,755
    Trophy Points:
    113
    We had a similar situtation were kids with zero balances were stamped but fed and this forum was lit up with anger by a certain political group all because of the stamp.

    In this situation kids were not fed at all. Lets see which is worse eh?

    I didnt think the stamp was bad because it was a great way to nofify the parents to put more money in the account. The kids were still fed. I believed in that thread i was called aracist and "hated" poor kids even though the only word of this "shaming" came from the principal who had been fired.

    This situation is horrid. They litterally handed kids food and then took it away leaving them with nothing?
     
  3. Professor Peabody

    Professor Peabody Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Messages:
    94,819
    Likes Received:
    15,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This happened in Massachewsetts?
     
  4. RP12

    RP12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2011
    Messages:
    48,878
    Likes Received:
    11,755
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes and i expect this to be a high view low post count thread as the libs will avoid this like plague specially after the insult fest from the other thread....
     
  5. 10A

    10A Chief Deplorable Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2013
    Messages:
    5,698
    Likes Received:
    1,006
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    WTF was the principal doing when this was going on? The public school system is overrun with ineffective, overpaid administrators. Cut the administrators in half, cut the pay of the remaining administrators, and give that money to the overworked teachers.
     
  6. smallblue

    smallblue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2013
    Messages:
    4,380
    Likes Received:
    570
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Probably his job, which I doubt entails monitoring the daily lunch lines.
     
  7. 10A

    10A Chief Deplorable Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2013
    Messages:
    5,698
    Likes Received:
    1,006
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Oh yes, the principal has no responsibility for the students. :roll: Voters who give the principal and other administrators a pass on issues like this are part of the problem.
     
  8. smallblue

    smallblue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2013
    Messages:
    4,380
    Likes Received:
    570
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Did you continue reading to see the part where the principal did take responsibility when the issue was finally brought to principal's attention.
     
  9. Professor Peabody

    Professor Peabody Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Messages:
    94,819
    Likes Received:
    15,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Is anybody gettin fired?
     
  10. Surfer Joe

    Surfer Joe Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2008
    Messages:
    24,350
    Likes Received:
    15,461
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Cons "make crap like this up" all the time. That's what happens when you put profits above people.
    I don't see why you are complaining since such thinking is one of the cons' favorite ideological pillars.
    They are willing to throw anyone under the bus who can't pay his/her own way.
    I bet Whitson is a market leader in cutting their employees' hours to avoid having to pay them healthcare and God knows where they actually source their food from to help increase their profits.
     
  11. RP12

    RP12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2011
    Messages:
    48,878
    Likes Received:
    11,755
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nice deflection care to discuss the topic?
     
  12. 10A

    10A Chief Deplorable Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2013
    Messages:
    5,698
    Likes Received:
    1,006
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Yes. So?
     
  13. 10A

    10A Chief Deplorable Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2013
    Messages:
    5,698
    Likes Received:
    1,006
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    So many strawmen, so little substance.
     
  14. The Wyrd of Gawd

    The Wyrd of Gawd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2012
    Messages:
    29,682
    Likes Received:
    3,995
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Seeing that this isn't the first time this has happened such incidents should not be happening today.

    At an Utah elementary school some kids had their lunches taken away and thrown in the garbage because they owed money.
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/01/30/uintah-school-student-lunches_n_4695968.html

    So since this issue is always in the news why does the dumb principal acted surprised when it happens at his/her school? The dummy should address the issue before it happens, not after.

    If the school serves food then it shouldn't charge the students. That's what school taxes are for. After all, it's not like the price the students pay cover the cost of the food anyway. So the school districts should just serve the kids free food.
     
  15. Mac-7

    Mac-7 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2011
    Messages:
    86,664
    Likes Received:
    17,636
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Conservatives did not do this.

    Libs did.
     
  16. Strasser

    Strasser Banned

    Joined:
    May 6, 2012
    Messages:
    4,219
    Likes Received:
    526
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Reads like just another case of the mindless 'privatization' mania so beloved by libertoon fanatics and right wing sociopaths running amok as usual.
     
  17. Surfer Joe

    Surfer Joe Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2008
    Messages:
    24,350
    Likes Received:
    15,461
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The topic was a company who puts profits above everything else and is willing to let kids go hungry rather than letting them have lunch because they owe some money.
    Classic right-wing bull(*)(*)(*)(*).
     
  18. RP12

    RP12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2011
    Messages:
    48,878
    Likes Received:
    11,755
    Trophy Points:
    113

    Rightwing bull(*)(*)(*)(*) in a liberal state with a liberal education system? Care to try some logic this time.
     
  19. Mac-7

    Mac-7 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2011
    Messages:
    86,664
    Likes Received:
    17,636
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Too bad for the lib talking points that it happened in the People's Socialist Republic of Massachusetts where there are no conservatives.

    Meaning that even the evil, rich, greedy business owners are libs.

    And the cafateria workers too.
     
  20. Oldyoungin

    Oldyoungin Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2013
    Messages:
    22,382
    Likes Received:
    5,915
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What a surprise , another thread turning into partisan bickering.
     
  21. RichT2705

    RichT2705 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    28,887
    Likes Received:
    4,821
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I notice he's trying to do a little damage control , and downplay it a notch with his word choices here.

    Not quite. if Im reading the story correctly these students had lunches given to them, and then were forced to throw them away.

    Thats much worse than being told no you cant have one. They were given one, and then had it taken from them...and wasted the food and money spent on it by throwing it in the trash.

    Hope someone gets (*)(*)(*)(*)canned to send a message.
     
  22. Surfer Joe

    Surfer Joe Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2008
    Messages:
    24,350
    Likes Received:
    15,461
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Whitson is a big private company working across many states, with deliberate policies that put the emphasis on profits over anything else.
    A lot of mealy-mouthed backtracking now because they were embarrassed by their actions doesn't change the fact that they were willing to deny children lunches because the were owed some money.
    That reflects the corporate culture that right-wingers love to defend.
    Right-wingers should be applauding them for their actions instead of pretending hypocritically that they give a (*)(*)(*)(*) about whether poor school kids get to eat lunch.
     
  23. RP12

    RP12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2011
    Messages:
    48,878
    Likes Received:
    11,755
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Hate to break it to you but the move for Profit exists in la la liberal land....
     
  24. Surfer Joe

    Surfer Joe Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2008
    Messages:
    24,350
    Likes Received:
    15,461
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The only one responsible for this is Whitsons and their corporate policies.
    Trying to scapegoat some minimum wage food server is a sham since the employee was just following company policy.
     
  25. RP12

    RP12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2011
    Messages:
    48,878
    Likes Received:
    11,755
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Please quote or link the company policy that dictates serving food to kids and then taking it away when they have a low or zero balance.
     

Share This Page