Republicans won't let Benghazi go . . .

Hillary and Barry should be at Gitmo, behind the fence! Common sense says they knew, they covered up, and they are responsible for those who died!

 

But there is no evidence that they knew!

 

the difference is that the cold hearted (*)(*)(*)(*)(*) looked right into the eyes of a grieving mother and bold faces lied to her about the death of her son
what kind of person could do that and would you want that type of person in the white house if she can tell that type of lie there is no telling what other lies she would be willing to tell
Hillary Clinton is the war on women if she can lie to a grieving mother

- - - Updated - - -

if they didn't know they should be in Gitmo for incompetence either way she is not fit to hold office

 

There is no way they could have known..........who was going to attack, how many, with what weapons, exactly what time, etc.

But keep pretending they could have. Its the comedy we don't have to pay for and its priceless.

 

Im talking about after the fact when documents have proven people there at the seen during and the day after said it wasn't a spontaneous attack as the result of some you tube vid

 

Can you prove any of these nonsense claims?

 

Benghazi Victim’s Mother Says Hillary Lied: ‘You Don’t Want This Person to be President’

“Not only that, but she knew at the time that it was wrong what she was telling me,” Smith said, referring to the administration’s claim that the attacks were instigated by a YouTube video. “I want the whole world to know it: she lied to my face, and you don’t want this person to be president.”
http://www.nationalreview.com/corne...lied-you-dont-want-person-be-president-Andrew

US officials knew Libya attack was terrorism within 24 hours, sources confirm
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...as-terrorism-within-24-hours-sources-confirm/

 

I believe that your "large majority" is all that is phony. Try telling that to the families of Ambassador Stevens, computer specialist Sean Smith, and CIA security contractors Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty. Only phony Americans believe that the incompetence and subsequent cover up by this administration followed are phony.

 

It was a protest?
You're going back to that lie again? Too funny!

 

How typical.... blame it on the victims. Progressiveness at its finest!

 

And progressive willful ignorance and denial is at the comedic core!

 

As you and Hillary once said, "
What difference does it make? " The only thing that can be proven is the continued lie, deny and blame tactics of progressives.

 

The Ambassador voluntarily went into a dangerous war zone. Not only did the Ambassador get himself killed, but he got several others killed too. If Ambassador Anderson was just injured an not killed, could he point the finger at Hillary and say, "You did this to me"?

 

So? For that he deserved to have his requests for additional security denied by Hillary's State Department? And btw, it was no due to lack of funding as you Oppressivies like to claim.

How did he do that?

Apparently he doesn't have to, the bi-partisan, Democrat led, Senate Select Committee on Intelligence has done that for him!

 

So? They had reason to believe the terrorist attack was due to a video at the time. They were rioting in Egypt and Muslims have a tendency to attack people who disagree with Islam. Just ask Salman Rushdie.

Once reports conflicted with what they believed, they changed their mind...............this is called learning!

- - - Updated - - -

I didn't say it was. WOW, you guys love to say stupid things and then get confused on why we laugh at you guys!

Now that is funny! Please post more so we can laugh or run away so we can't laugh at you. Have it YOUR way. We don't mind!

 

I clearly asked if a protest couldn't be viewed as terrorism..............if that protest terrorizes citizens.

Instead of answering my question(since you know the answer will prove you wrong) you just tuck your tail and run away from it. SAD, but very funny!

 

Not when they were informed otherwise--- and far in advance of the time they sent Rice out to try out their cover-up story.

Salman Rushdie?

How deperate one must be to invoke Salman Rushdie as a reference?



.

 

Oh please. don't be insulting. You were trying to make an argument for the attack being a protest and as it has been testified to, there was NEVER confusion of the fact that it was an attack. Ham briefed Dempsey and Panetta just prior to a WH briefing that it was a terrorist attack.

 

they had no reason to believe because of the reports given to them by the actual people who was their before and during the attack

"According to the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee report on Benghazi, on Sept. 15, four days after the attack and one day before Rice’s appearance, the CIA's most senior operative on the ground in Libya emailed Morell and others at the agency that the attack was "not/not an escalation of protests."

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...ghazi-narrative-accounts-raise-new-questions/

 

You're relying "foxnews"? The same liars that made up "stand down"?

 

they didn't make up "Stand Down" that was the phrase given to them by former deputy chief of mission Greg Hicks
and all your doing is playing word semantics.
what difference does it make if they was told to "stand down" or "remain in place" the results were the same they was denied permission to go and lend help

 

Fox made it up well before Hicks who never used the words himself.

http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=302698&page=26&p=1062631107#post1062631107

 

do you even know the difference between a military stand down order and a remain in place order are?
either order denied them the permission to go and help. correct?
like I said before your playing a silly game of word semantics

and by the way your link is broken but that is expected from you

 

There was no "stand down" order or order. You've been duped again by RW propaganda lies.

The Committee explored claims that there was a "stand down" order given to the security team at the Annex. Although some members of the security team expressed frustration that they were unable to respond more quickly to the Mission compound, 12 the Committee found no evidence of intentional delay or obstruction by the Chief of Base or any other party. ... The Committee has reviewed the allegations that U.S. personnel, including in the IC (Intelligence Community) or DoD, prevented the mounting of any military relief effort during the attacks, but the Committee has not found any of these allegations to be substantiated.

http://www.intelligence.senate.gov/benghazi2014/benghazi.pdf

The link works fine you're wrong. But that is expected from you.