Republicans won't let Benghazi go . . .

ITS THE SAME GUY! Obama is in charge of all those people. Why hasnt he done ANYTHING regarding the matter then? The answer is because he cant. He knows if he does it will open a can of worms that leads back to his desk. What office is higher than Obama? Is he that meek he cant fire someone? Apparently he can drone someone without issue but fire someone or publicly excoriate the people responsible for mishandling the youtube blame story is beyond his pay grade. Fact is, he IS the guy responsible thats why no ones ass is in the vice for this. Hes going to clam up until his term is over and he will go down in history as the single most corrupt President we have ever had. Nixon resigned over less and if nixon has more morals than Obama, that doesnt say much for the intelligence of the people still suporrting him at this point. Its fn pathetic really.

 

You don't know that he hasn't done anything, actually. He may have, but unless explicitly asked "Who'd you fire for this?" I don't think he'd just volunteer that information.

What I'm curious to see is if anybody leading the charge against his handling of the situation has actually asked that question.

 

Who would I fire? Id fire Obama but I cant because he is the President. IF I were him and I failed the nation I would resign but then again I would have put the lives of four people above my worries over election votes. I would have also never lied to the nation and blamed it on something so idiotic as a youtube video. The only thing dumber than that are the people who were dumb enough to believe it. Sure impromptu attacks happen all the time where people just whip out their 100,000 dollar rocket launchers right? Most people have those in their trunk right? Right now somewhere an Obama voter is reading that and saying "they do?" Those were the people Obama was speaking to. Sadly Obama actually was correct in assuming half the country is in fact stupid.

 

Benghazi is a joke and it's boring. They keep taunting the same old dried up tales, but haven't proven a one. Time to put Benghazi on ignore.

 

No, at least 80% of the country is stupid.

 

cant exactly argue with you there, I was being generous.

 

No,there wasn't '13 benghazis' on Bush's watch...


/do better

 

9/11 was enough on his watch without the other 13.

 

Eyes on Benghazi: two thirds of American voters want a congressional investigation

Though a wide spectrum of Democrats, progressives, Obama administration officials and certain members of the press pine for the Benghazi matter to fade away, voters will have none of it.

“Should Congress continue to investigate the Obama administration’s handling of the terrorist attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya that resulted in the deaths of four Americans?”

And so asks a new Fox News poll of 1,006 registered U.S. voters released Sunday, and here is what they said.

Overall, 66 percent of the respondents want the investigation to continue. And more specifically, 83 percent of Republicans, 50 percent of Democrats and 68 percent of independents agree — along with 92 percent of tea partyers, 78 percent of conservatives, 47 percent of liberals, 58 percent of blacks, 67 percent of whites, 68 percent of women and 63 percent of men.

Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news...irds-american-voters-want-cong/#ixzz2uOQ2QxW6
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter

And you was saying again?
looks like the vast majority of America disagrees with you, but you use to that no one agreeing with you

 

Fox News poll? You can't be serious? X2 on my last post. Everything has been covered. Time for the right to get a life.

 

This is going to end up like the witch hunt against clinton: Obama's gonna lie about something inconsequential regarding his sex life or smoking weed or something completely different and unrelated, get impeached and still be president.

We've seen this republican game before. The GOP crowd acts like pack of wild monkeys flinging (*)(*)(*)(*) until something sticks. It's political bull(*)(*)(*)(*)tery and so what if 2/3 of americans want a congressional investigation? I don't think they're all rooting for Obama to step down, they're probably rooting to oust whomever might have made bad decisions. If you're a manager at a restaurant and someone burns themselves on a stove while you're on shift, why is it your fault and not the fault of the person that put themselves in a situation to get burned? Even if you ordered that person to burn themselves, you think they'll do it?

 

"yeah we should all just forget about it shouldnt we? and not learn from our mistakes" -every liberal alive

 

Your delusions are duly noted.

 

Thank you sir of person of no credit or sway, just like myself.

 

English please.

 

It wasn't Obama's mistake, it was Hillary Clinton's.

 

No, the last Ambassador to be killed in the Line of duty was when Jimmy Carter was President.

What exactly did you expect Bush to do in 8 months that Bill Clinton couldn't accomplish in 2 YEARS?

 

Ahh so he's responsible for surprise attacks now?

 

Again, he wasnt order to stand down..............but you never admitted it for some strange reason.
Secondly, Lt. Col Gibson said that they didn't have enough time. Its in the congressional reports that you refuse to read! Look forward to you proving they DID have enough time. Prove the Lt. Col. is wrong, but you didn't even try. Is this because you KNOW you can't and your failure will be exposed?

Then I wonder why you didn't even try!

So you are not willing to admit there was no stand down order, but you are trying your best to keep from insulting us? WHAHAHAHH! Now that it hilarious. I wonder why you CANT admit this. Scared or some other reason? LMAO!

When the attack started troops in Tripoli were not told to stand down, they were told to guard Tripoli in case it came under attack. Amb. Stevens was killed within 90mins of the attack. There were no other troops(outside Tripoli) close by that could have responded to make a difference.

Now in order to prove me wrong, tell me where those other troops were in the world that could have gotten there in 90 mins!

 

But yet the GOP is the one who repeatedly screamed about the gov't spending! So you are saying they are not happy about the goal they wanted? Interesting! LOL Evacuation??? How weak would you claim Obama was if he retreated and ran away?

Yep and all the funding that was available for security was spent. And all the security measures were met(save 1, the guard towers that were determined to be overbearing). Please try watching some congressional hearings. It will keep me from having to explain something to you that you could find on your own.

So this only leaves the question as to why you didn't try to find it yourself? Scared of what you will find or some other answer? I know you will run from these questions. All conservatives do. They don't want us to know why they just CANT understand. They would rather us question their intelligence and then get confused on why we do.

 

NO, no, no!!!! Its how I get entertained. When you go to a comedy show, you have to listen to what the comedian wants to talk about. This type of comedy(benghazi), I get to participate in topics that I want to talk about.

Interactive comedy, if you will. Its more interesting, its more entertaining.

Its like telling a child that pine trees have bark on them and the child refuses to believe you because the pine tree is tall.................as if height has anything to do with bark. When they make up stupid things to keep from understanding, it allows us to question their intelligence. They don't like, but continue to say stupid things for our enjoyment. They don't realize they are entertaining us.

 

I have admitted it. a remain in place order was given which is the same result as stand down they was denied permission to go and help that is the point

at the time he was told to remain in place Lt. Col Gibson had no idea when the attack was going to end not till the attack did end in hind sight. this is the part that baffles me about you. you don't understand that they had no idea when the attack was going to end at the time they was given the order to remain in place not to go, and help. there for not knowing they wouldn't get there in time. you still refuse to answer the question how in the hell did the military know when the attack was going to end before it did so to know they wasn't going to get there in time you cant answer that simple question because they didn't know there for they didn't know they wasn't going to get there in time

Its is the same as saying "I'm going to be late to an appointment"
and then someone asking "when is the appointment"
and you reply "I don't know what time the appointment is"
how in the hell do you know your going to be late to an appointment when you have no clue what time the appointment is

 

The wacko birds were always going to have a problem pretending Secretaries of State personally devise security details for all overseas facilities at an operational level. Their desperate attempt to slime the likely Democratic presidential nominee was going nowhere anyway, but CIA Chief Petraeus's praise for Clinton was the coup de grâce .

Add this one to their smoldering monumental midden of sordid gambits.

Wave bye bye once again, Darrell.

 

That depends! How responsible is Obama for surprise attacks?

 

I'm trying to function today. I'm going to have to find something for you to do so I can function myself.