Can unmarried Christians have oral?

Oral sex, handjobs, and anal are all considered to be sodomy. So even if married, they are a sin.

A little something these fools fail to realize when they push their bull(*)(*)(*)(*) anti-sodomy laws.

 

So far , no answer....guess the "truth" and "reality" were too much this time ...

 

The sin is any sexual activity without being married. Even thinking.

 

Once the jerkers will ask to marry their right hand. Or the oral sex will be taught at schools - it will be the same protest from the side of christians.

 

So you don't agree with cupid?



"""""""""""Originally Posted by cupid dave
Christianity just does not want to talk about any of these matters and believes people need avoid such discussions totally.

Just don't have a baby when unmarried.
That is the only rule ,with total darkness on the subject of sex, otherwise."""""""""""

 

No babies by unmarried people.
This is the only rule with a complete absence of discussion otherwise.

You seem to need to tell everyone what you do in a bedroom.
That is not permitted by the Christian teachings.

 

OK, so I took off the questions marks and you agree with the following:


So it's OK if unmarried christians bonk like rabbits as long as no child is produced.

The sin is in making a baby. Babies sinful. Bad.

If they get pregnant and have an abortion , thus no baby, it is OK .

 

I think that cupid dave just doesn't like the manner I have just been talking about sex. And partly I would agree. This is one thing.

I was answering about the sin. And the sin is clear. That was the second thing.

Cupid dave just asked not to have a baby being unmarried because it is not only the sin against both sinners who make sex. It is the sin and problems of a child who is born outside a possibility of a family. But Cupid Dave for sure didn't mean that everyone can ucfk the way they need but not to have kids. That is the third thing

Mixture of these things is not between me and cupid (what is technically possible) and for sure this mixture has nothing to deal with religion. It's your mixture. You got used to look for anything that can work for you as an excuse for making a sin. I am the same btw, so I understand it well.

 

Well first the way you phrased the question is wrong, since it carries a distinctly different meaning than what I know you intended.

second, Christian principles are pretty clear about SEX. Are you asking if oral sex is sex? Come on.

and I don't get how you get to wondering if holding hands is sex.

 

I don't think you get to speak for Dave even if he has a hard time speaking for himself.

However , if you follow our exchange you will see what he believes from his own words. And it is clear to me that he believes:

""" it's OK if unmarried christians bonk like rabbits as long as no child is produced.

The sin is in making a baby. Babies sinful. Bad.

If they get pregnant and have an abortion , thus no baby, it is OK . """


AND, I do NOT need any "excuse" for "making a sin".... I do as I please and don't have to follow YOUR rules...

 

Wishful Thinking!

 

You got it right, for sure.

I believe that only Gays and harlots will ask questions like these.
They ignore the Facts, that silence on these matters are to the welfare of our children.

 

Children aren't allowed in PF.


OK, so I took off the questions marks and you agree with the following:


So it's OK if unmarried christians bonk like rabbits as long as no child is produced.

The sin is in making a baby. Babies sinful. Bad.

If they get pregnant and have an abortion , thus no baby, it is OK .

 

Since he clicked 'like' on my comment it means that he agrees with my interpretation better than with yours.
You didn't understand what he said. A russian christian understands an american christian better than non-christian of english-native can understand the same...

Check the context again. Don't insist on your mistake, because this insisting will not make your words any better.

These are not my rules... I didn't set them. I just try to follow them.

 

sometimes, but it's a gamble. if kids are raised in a complete bubble, with zero outside influence, silence might preserve their chastity (such a bizarre concept). if they've been raised in society, with a parental silence on the home front, they generally won't have been taught to be discriminating, either, since Silence Parenting is uncomfortable with the idea that kids might think. such kids very often reach 17 or 18 and go ape-shi.te, because EVERYTHING seems glamorous. even the bad stuff.

it's safer to expose kids to the good and bad - within reason, and clearly demonstrate that the 'bad' is for losers etc. at my house, we allocated the descriptor "PD&D" to the nastier habits of the young. PD&D translating to "poor, dumb, and dirty" - the poor element clarified as behaviour, not fiscal status. ie, behaving like a soda guzzling, barely educated, fast food eating, morbidly obese, giant tv owning redneck. all of which actually takes far more money than its opposite. anyway, you get the drift. better to show 'em what's real, and steer them to want better. pretending nasty doesn't exist by silence is a huge gamble, imho.

 

So an unmarried couple can have as much manual, oral, and anal sex as they want....and "no harm, no foul" with God?

(I'm deliberately leaving out vaginal and a discussion of contraception)

 

You are breaking the One Rule:


..."the only rule is a complete absence of discussion,..."

 

Consider it edited out.....manual, oral, and anal sex......any problem for you if unmarried couples engage in those activities. They CAN NOT produce a baby.

"No babies by unmarried people.
This is the only rule with a complete absence of discussion otherwise."

 

How many "only" rules do you have ?

"Absence of discussion' means you can't address the fact that you claimed :
it's OK if unmarried christians bonk like rabbits as long as no child is produced.

The sin is in making a baby. Babies sinful. Bad.

If they get pregnant and have an abortion , thus no baby, it is OK .

 

Yes they can!....and some, are exceptionally good at it!

 

Did a quick scan...and I don't see anything in the Bible that talks negatively about non-married people having non-reproductive sex.

Lots of talk about husbands and wives having sex, typically reproductive. Some talk against homosexuality (mostly Old Testament). Some talk about infertility. And one story of Onan, who didn't want to get his sister-in-law pregnant...so he engaged in coitus interruptus. But even they were "technically married" under The Law, because she would have been considered his "wife" after his brother's death.

It's too fantastic to imagine the ancient Hebrews or Apostles NEVER HEARD of oral sex....so by Occam's Razor....it's not unreasonable to assume they didn't consider oral sex "sinful" and may have even conisidered it a "fun" thing to do for singles, while abstaining from vaginal sex in order to not have children outside of wedlock (and thus raise legal issues of inheritance, etc.)

 

No according to the Bible but I realize this belief is promoted by Christianity.

 

So a god decided to gave all animals the most amazing sex drive...and then consider it a sin to act upon it. Your god is a (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)-bag. Not only that, he created homosexuals and then forbid them to have sex with the people that are by nature, attracted to. I take it back, your god is an (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*).

 

How about bukakke ? technically you are not leaving your seed on earth .
And how about torture bondage ? it is a sexual activity without sex .

 

they'll say it's a test, of course. because that's how god amuses himself in the neverending dullness of eternity. he's the master of the mind(*)(*)(*)(*).