Gay Rights Activists Outraged Over Billboard’s Message

Liberals have worn out the race card and need something new to try and shame normal folks into going along with them. That is why I have an immunity to their tactics. I realize it is nothing more than trying to silence people who disagree with them. There is no good argument for homosexuality and they know it.

 

Yeah there is a good argument for homosexuality. They exist, thus that is an argument for it.

 

I have never met a gay that claimed it was environment. You don't have to put it on a billboard to understand that's the gay agenda...


"you don't have proof that gay is not genetic = bad science"
"I don't have proof that gay is genetic = you are a bigot if you don't accept that as scientific fact"


love it when the gaymafia gets enraged over their own tactics being thrown back at them...

 

Lol you can peddle that bull(*)(*)(*)(*) to someone else. Do you REALLY think anyone is going to buy the idea that so many gays wear leather to gay pride parades because they rode their motorcycles up there??
(*)(*)(*)(*) of here.

 

I personally imagine they wear leather because that is what they put on prior to attending, and they did so because they feel sexy wearing it, or it bothers people like you, or they just want to let other leather enthusiasts know that they share their enthusiasm.

If you think what they are doing is perverted, A: don't participate.
B: sit inyour house and stew about it rant and rave on the internet to your little hearts delight or whatever makes you feel better about it.

I don't think the leather enthusiasts care what you think. People who don't care what they do, that would be me, don't really care what you think either.

You think a gay person wearing chaps is perverted but a straight person wearing them isn't, you are clearly prejudiced.

 

What (*)(*)(*)(*)ing difference does it make?? I don't care if it is or is not a choice. If it is people are entitled to choose what they do and do not like. If it's not, it is what it is. This whole discussion is tired and stupid.

 

I agree.

Most people that say it's a choice do so only to feel justified in their chastising.

My thoughts on that are if you have to justify chastising you probably are wrong.

Then you have the same people that say it's also a mental disorder. They are merely grasping desperately at ways to justify their repulsion.

I don't really understand the repulsion, if it is something you don't like to do, don't do it. I don't like dating women (no offense ladies, I love you, just men are more attractive to me) I am not repulsed by the thought of having sex with them, I just don't.

I really think the repulsion is a mechanism to convince themselves that they will never " end up gay."

The more people are accepting that some people are gay for whatever reason the less repulsive they feel the need to make everybody aware of.

Basically if it's a choice nobody is straight.

 

my freedom of movement shall not be impeded because you want to simulate deviate sex acts on a float because I happen to live on a parade route, or have to travel through one during a work time for me.

I understand the gay way.... I'm not offended by gays simulating sex anymore than I would be at a mardi-gra parade where things can get risque as well, but at least at mardi-gra, they have family friendly parades (in the am) where I don't have to worry about my 8 yo seeing it as we do our day to day errands and whatnot if we get caught up in the route, and mardi-gra has more risque parades atafter 9pm, where, my 8 yo is already in bed. If I choose to keep him up, the chances of us running around that late at night is much lower.

 

Your freedom of movement isn't impeded. No police officer will arrest you for just driving to work. If the festival slows or detours traffic, that really isn't infringement on you rights. And you don't have to look.

If you feel that it is obscene call the police. It's against the law it's called disorderly conduct in most places

If you are simply offended by it, you have the right to be offended, you just don't have the right to force everybody to not offend you.

If your kid ask you questions that you find difficult to answer or sees some people wearing less clothing than normal well you shouldn't have had children.

 

you're right... but public decency laws still apply to simulated sex acts that my 8 yo gets exposed to as we freely are allowed to leave our house. YOu suggested we just stay in our house to not get offended. I'm simply saying.... you don't have that right to tell me that so you can simulate oral and anal sex

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toron...l-trustees-ask-about-enforcing-laws-1.2560522

except when this school trustee dared to question it, he recieved death threats for his trouble.....

and the same can be said about the gays getting offended by a billlboard.

you parent your way, I'll parent mine. Just because you don't like me teaching my child that there is no scientific proof that gay is genetic.... doesn't mean I am wrong.

 

LOTS of people not only live, but work on OTHER parade routes. Here's a hint, if you don't like that, you and others can petition the city where you live. Otherwise, deal with it or move.

Yes, there are some people that are idiots I agree that do things too much (Mardi-Gras or Pride), the same as with ANY event, daytime or nighttime.

And I've been to the so called "family-friendly" Mardi Gras parades, they are still sexually risqué. The simple facts of life are, if you know an event like that is going on and you don't want your 8 year old to see (whether it is Mardi-Gras or Pride), then don't take him on errands that day and do it another day.

 

except it's been proven, if you dare to suggest that gay parades "keep it in their pants" so to speak and to follow common decency laws, they are called homophobic and have death threats hurled at them...

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toron...l-trustees-ask-about-enforcing-laws-1.2560522

so to petition the city, I would have to risk the safety of my family as it has been shown more and more. A person is simply "not allowed" to disagree with anything gay unless you want to risk your job/career and family safety and security. And it's not limited to just certain cities....

that sounds good in theory... but somethings have to be done at certain times based on your own schedules... Running around town on your only day off and job schedules make "do it another day" not quite as simple as you want to dismiss it as. Especially when deepthroating a dildo in public is inappropriate while running errands with JR is not.

 

Well sounds like you're scared to do anything about it. Guess what, just like conservatives like to tell those that can't find jobs, move then.

Sounds like where you live at just isn't for you then, I suggest you move so you aren't offended.

You don't have the right to not be offended. And if they are breaking the law and you are too chicken-(*)(*)(*)(*) to report it, that's on you.

 

I understand this may be hard for you to comprehend and all, but I'm not personally having an issue because we don't have gay-pride parades here. It's just funny you suggest complaining to the city... but when I link a story saying that someone that did just that was met with death threats to him and his family and you don't denounce said actions, but instead, tell people to deal with it.

see above....

and neither does the gay activists who are upset about a billboard. If someone wants to drop a dime on a billboard... that's their right. You can always just not look at the sign, stay indoors, avoid the place the signs are, like you suggest I do when you thought I was offended by gay pride sexual simulations in public.


the big difference between the two though.... there is nothing illegal about a sign. There are laws against indecent exposure

 

I never said they did have a right not to be offended.

No arguments there. However, just like people have a right to put up that billboard, people also have the right to criticize those that put up the billboard.

I don't think the billboard people should be "legally" forced to take it down. They have a right to do such a thing. However they are not free from criticism for it anymore than Gay Pride parades are.

Protesting goes both ways.

Yes, there is. And if people in a gay pride are committing illegal acts, I say they should fined. However, just like those in a Mardi Gras parade "get away with it", so too does members of a pride parade.

 

One good thing about the homophobic bigots........they're going extinct-

by Frank Newport and Igor Himelfarbl

Princeton, NJ -- Americans' views toward a number of moral issues have shifted significantly since 2001. Their acceptance of gay and lesbian relations has increased the most, up 19 percentage points in the past 12 years --

Gay or Lesbian Relaions % Morally Acceptable

2001 - 40% 2013- 59% Pt. Change- 19% ​

http://www.gallup.com/poll/162689/record-high-say-gay-lesbian-relations-morally.aspx

 

it does seem we may not see eye to eye on the actual issue of gay marraige and traditional marriage... but I do think we are in agreement with the points that neither side should be protected from being offended.


Seriously, I think this sign is just a retaliatory type of thing. a "lets just see how they like it when we do what they do"


but of course, the gay supporters are not going to go "hey, wow, now I see your point.... I'll stop supporting it when gay activists do (xxx) just to aggrevate you and your beliefs"


what's IS going to happen is the other side will respond with more of the same

 

Yep, I agree with you in that neither side should be protected from criticism.

Yep, it is just inflammatory IMO. Kind of like when the atheists put up their billboard. It's not my dime, but I think it's a waste of money personally. While billboards are great for marketing for products, I don't think anyone's mind has been swayed by a billboard.

 

really? and when did the number of butthole plungers increase? at less than 2.5% of the population, I'd think it is the gays heading for extinction....

 

No.....the percentage of people who think homosexual relationships are immoral....DROPPED.

Or conversely, those who don't think they are immoral ROSE by 19% in 12 years.


If you think homosexuality is immoral....you're in a SHRINKING minority.

Congratulations.

 

I take that as a honor and wear it proudly. beggary boys and make pretend women/men are in the minority. Hell, they don't need protection, they just need a long sleep pill. a very long sleep.......

 

Wow.....harkening back to the days of Pink Triangles and throwing gays in death camps, huh?

Fortunately my grand-dad defeated you guys in '45.

 

sure, its a great start......
I have my 1st A rights and you cannot tell me what to say, think, or do.........and currently, I remain undefeated...lmmfao......punk Libs will get it wrong every time

 

yeah yeah, all we want is the right to get married ............what a line of horse (*)(*)(*)(*):
http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/12/c...pro-traditional-marriage-cake-denied-service/
seems someone is getting ready to get their asses sued off because they wont bake a cake with a traditional message ......damned gays are liars!!!!!!
About time the damned gays really learned what Rights really mean. I'm donating to this guy's cause.....