2 armed suspects shot outside Mohammed art event in Texas >Read mod warning in OP<

Maybe, we shouldn't be trying to recruit for the terrorists is what I am saying. I think they are good enough at recruiting stupid people to corrupt with their bastardized version of Islam without Texas' help.

 

Wait.. what? What is a bastardized version of islam?

 

I don't think doing something that someone else might find offensive really qualifies as inciting violence. We have a fundamental right in this country to say and do things that others might find offensive on religious grounds. Just ask the nation's Christians about that. Would you want atheists, satanists, etc. to be expected to shut up just because some Christians issue threats of violence against them? That happens, in fact, and quite frequently. It's just not followed up on all that often.

 

It's the version that these terrorists get into their minds that makes them think that they should be out there killing people and blowing themselves up. It's like when Christians take one verse out of the bible, and base an entire philosophy on it? Except when you read the whole chapter, it's not about what Christians are making it out to be at all?

These morons do it too.

 

Boo Hoo for any Muslim that comes to a free country and is offended by free speech and cartoons.

Any liberals that feels sympathy for offended Muslims that come here on their own free will deserve to tarred and feathered---or at least laughed out of the room.

 

I'm just trying to keep Texas from recruiting for ISIS, is all. You would think that Americans would be against doing things that led people to join ISIS. Kinda (*)(*)(*)(*)ing counter productive to our war effort there Texas.

There would be different ways of doing this. For example, showing a picture of Osama Bin Laden being run up the pooper by a pig, or KSM in a rabbi outfit. There are tons of terrorists out there to make fun of and it wouldn't (*)(*)(*)(*) off the ENTIRE religion.

 

You ACCEPT their belief that they are supposed to kill infidels who criticize Islam because Mohammad had critics of his killed (Asma B. Marwan, Abu Afak, etc.)....don't accept this! Call them on it. They have no right to kill me for drawing a cartoon of a dead guy! You're providing them cover, of sorts....their belief is wrong, wrong, wrong, but you can't admit that.

- - - Updated - - -

So we can both agree that most all Muslims ("the ENTIRE religion") are irrational if simply drawing cartoons p's them off, correct?

 

No, terrorists interpretation of this belief is wrong. I just don't know why you want to recruit for the terrorists is all.

I mean if that's your game plan, I think it's a (*)(*)(*)(*)ty one, and you should get the money up front for doing it.

I just think that doing this sort of thing is counter productive to our war effort against terrorists, and we shouldn't be recruiting for them here on American soil. I have a big problem with that.

 

Muslims, welcome to the world of free speech. No "prophet", who won't prove himself, or his god who won't prove himself, gets a pass when they teach insane stuff (draw a cartoon and "we keel you".)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pRy9tdOEf14

- - - Updated - - -

Mohammad had critics of his killed....what's there to "interpret" about this? To a Muslim, who reads the Islamic texts, it makes perfect sense to slaughter for the religion. Sorry, but we need to face reality here.

- - - Updated - - -

Can you condemn Mohammad for saying to kill critics of his? I can. How about you?

 

Your posts are always so consistently good that you are starting to bore me.

If any of you criticize Richard Dawkins (and don't even THINK about drawing a cartoon of him!), I keel you! Since Mohammad taught the same thing, am I ok in making that proclamation? Or would Mohammad and I both be insane for saying that? Which is it, guys?

 

You know that guy is a HUGE hit in the Middle East, they absolutely LOVE him over there, especially Achmed the Dead Terrorist.

[video=youtube;b5H-dzbVDpU]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b5H-dzbVDpU[/video]

 

Couldn't agree more. The difference is the Christians will not be killing anybody for making a work of art.

 

I hope you can agree, though, that it's fundamentally wrong for people to kill other people over some religious offense. "Texas" is in the right here.

 

What an idiotic position. The actor is responsible for his deeds. Period. And a right can not be abused -- you are confused. A privilege can be abused... and free speech is not a privilege.

 

I'm not Muslim, I can't say one way or another. I don't really care.

 

Total BS. The ACTOR is responsible for his actions. I suppose the editors of Charlie Hebdo had it coming, eh?

 

Nooooooo . . . because the poster asked leftists what religions Right of Center posters were ALLOWED to offend. As far as generic leftwing responses go, only Christianity consistently fits that bill. A good segment of this OP in fact is dedicated to the HOWLS of outrage from leftists enraged because poor 'ittle Islamic terrorist types were . . . offended. Sad but true.

 

Yes, it is wrong to kill someone over religious bull(*)(*)(*)(*).

And no, Texas is wrong TOO. Because their actions with this bull(*)(*)(*)(*) does not help our war effort against terrorists. Do you not get this? Why the hell do you want to get people to become terrorists? Why would you do that? ESPECIALLY IN THE UNITED (*)(*)(*)(*)ING STATES OF *******MED AMERICA! The last (*)(*)(*)(*)ing thing we want here is to grow our own freaking ISIS terrorists!

 

The worst part of being an Islamic suicide terrorist is "Take your kid to work day", obviously.

- - - Updated - - -

They kill because Mohammad taught that, not because Geller points it out.

 

You can't condemn murder???

Sounds like a lying* Muslim to me.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TaqiyaWikipedia

 

You don't have to be a Muslim to condemn a "prophet" who said to kill his critics! You're running from the answer AND YOU KNOW IT. You don't care? Then why are you on a forum, if you don't care. I'm more moral than you if I care about the welfare of the world more than you do.
Again, can you condemn Mohammad for saying to kill critics of his? NOT doing so is a clear sign that you're not really on the side of peace, but rather on the side of political correctness - which is clearly dangerous.

 

I think you might be more right about that than I was.
I think we've got him! He's being exposed as less than moral, since he can't even condemn Mohammad saying to murder critics of his. HE'S part of the problem, it would appear. Running interference (well, indirectly at least) for the terrorists. He doesn't even realize it.

 

Two Islamic terrorists are dead. That's actually quite helpful. Bending over, grabbing ankles, while shrieking "We progressives just adore you Islamic terrorists and so please be gentle with us!" is not really all that helpful. Funny as hell to watch though.

 

Great post. You can be my wing man any time.

- - - Updated - - -

Maybe reincarnation is true....seems we have a bunch of reincarnations of Neville Chamberlain on this very forum!

 

No, I just don't care about make believe bull(*)(*)(*)(*), I DO care about people instigating our enemies, and actively doing things that recruit for them and embolden them.

Let me be perfectly clear on this, follow along, I... do... not... give... a... (*)(*)(*)(*)...

If you want to be perfectly honest about it, Christians and Jews used to kill their critics all the time as well. Hell, if you believe in the old testament, thats all the Jews did for 40 years wandering around the desert, slaughtering the local inhabitants. It's because all three follow the same evil Deity.