Major Gay Marriage Study Was Fabricated, Author Admits

MOST of us meet and interact with actual people. If you only interact with stereotypes, you are unique.

 

Most stereotypes are based upon fact. I know liberals don't like to hear that but it's true. Stereotypes do not apply to all and were never meant to... However most of them are based in reality.

 

Sorry, but there have been many polls over many years by many pollsters and they're all saying the same things. One outlier does not make your case.

 

In a sense, he is correct...but that also invalidates his overall position.

Heterosexual men who do not engage in anal sex with a woman, have virtually zero chance to contract aids through sexual intercourse. The mitigating factors would be cuts or open sores on or around the genitalia. Heterosexual women DO stand a higher chance of contracting HIV through sexual intercourse because the fluid transfer is mostly one way.

Anal sex of any kind can be abrasive to the skin and ups the chances of virus transfer.

 

You might do well to go out and meet an actual person. Looking for a stereotype will require you to carry a lamp with an infinite battery.

 

Can you read?

 

Yeah, why would I post world wide numbers, genius.

 

And you need to get your head out of the politically correct monsters behind and realize that you live in the real world where stereotypes do exist.

 

Right, but that's overlooking the point. The point is that 75%+ of the new cases each year are in gay men.

 

Lol, you look like me after I step away from a thread for a while and come back to reply page by page. Then I get to my comments and they fill the next two pages...

 

You mean like peaceful protesters that we've had to watch on tv for the last two years? I've definitely gotten a stereotype for them. And progressives.

 

It's nothing new that liberals - not progressives, liberals - make up their own facts and then work backwards to try to prove them. Moron Mayor DeBlasio stated unequivocally that his ending of stop and frisk had nothing whatsoever to do with the sudden surge in shootings in NYC and he would eventually do a study to prove it, not having the slightest concept that studies are undertaken to prove a hypothesis true or false, and you can't know the results until the study has taken place. But that's the way liberals are: they are so certain that they are correct that actual facts make no difference.

 

not true, women have been infected by men with the disease as well, are you saying it's cause all these women had anal intercourse with these men?

.

 

No it doesn't. My first sentence acknowledged that. Just in case you missed it I'll repeat it.

Even if the likelyhood of contracting HIV (Aids is a condition and cannot be contacted) is elevated among homosexual men...

 

And of course, many of us have our own stereotypes of right-wingnuts knee-jerking in their echo chamber. And as TheImmortal informs us, this stereotype is exemplified, ratified, and illustrated with unvarying consistency. I never met one of these "progressives" until I spent a little time observing the fervid imaginations of the wingnuts. That's where all of the progressives live, as stereotypical as indoctrination requires.

 

I think what you mean to say is even though the risk of contracting HIV IS SIGNIFICANTLY higher among homosexual men...

 

This is what happens when you mix politics with science it pollutes science so to push a political narrative
we see the same thing with global warming research and studies

 

Actually, you don't see that with global warming research and studies, you see that with the collision of those studies with politics. The actual science is fine, but after they've been filtered through political agendas (on both sides), the result is fonked up beyond all recognition.

 

I've sometimes wondered why those incapable of original thought, always seem to latch onto the dumbest thoughts fed to them.

 

You ignored it by stating IF homosexuals are more likely to contract HIV after you were provided the evidence for it. So no I didn't lie about anything.

No males who have sex with males represent about 2-3% of the population. Males who have sex with males under the age of 12 represent 27% of the total child molestation. Not only do they molest children at a prolific rate but youre FAR more likely to encounter a child molester in a room full of men who have sex with men than in a room with men who only have sex with women.

Unlike you I don't have to invent some kind of weird third sexuality to make excuses for why males wh have sex with males are so derelict and their child molestation numbers are so high.

 

Agenda? What agenda? If the author felt the study was flawed I applaud him for taking action.

 

As if you would know.

This claim was thoroughly refuted, as anyone with two neurons to rub together would already know. However, I understand why you're disqualified.

No fool looks stupider than those who pat themselves on the back for their own foolishness.

They say the great thing about being stupid is, you're incapable of realizing it. That realization requires intelligence. You've looked like the idiot you are with every exchange, and you show no sign of even figuring that out. Mocking you is like shooting fish in a barrel. It's not even sporting, it's so easy.

 

Huh? I'm a troll because he made a baseless statement he can't back up? Lol, ok.

 

The author didn't feel the study was flawed. He got lambasted after his study could not be reproduced. And he KNEW it couldn't be reproduced before he retracted it.

 

You've refuted nothing. You keep running your mouth with nothing to back it up. Like you always do. That's why you get beat down on here like every single day. By the way I'll be more than happy to take any test for a measurement of iq and put it up against yours. Any day of the week. I'll even let you pick the test.

Or you can just keep running that sucker of yours like you usually do.