Noam Chomsky: GOP Is "Literally A Serious Danger To Human Survival"

The legendary intellectual Noam Chomsky has describes the GOP has going off the rails and becoming a millstone tied around the collective necks of humanity! That is why Trump will lose badly in the upcoming elections in November because he is a nut! You don't have a rational debate with a nut. What you do is you don't vote for him.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/noam-chomsky-gop_us_56a66febe4b0d8cc109aec78?utm_hp_ref=politics

 

Heh. That's pretty damned rich coming from one of Pol Pot's fanboys.

Noam Chomsky is insane...

 

I did a search for this guy and most of the links that showed up went to Salon. That's all I need to know.

 

Does anyone really give a (*)(*)(*)(*) what Chomsky thinks?

 

Noam Chomsky is right.

 

That is a pure ad hominem attack. I've been hearing that for years and it is just not true. However, your heroes which you worship
were Shah fanboys, Augusto Pinochet fanboys, Suharto fanboys, Mobutu Sese Seko fanboys, Saddam Hussein fanboys, Somoza fanboys, Antonio Salazar fanboys, Francisco Franco, Ferdinand Marcos fanboys, Mubarak fanboys, Apartheid fanboys, Saudi Arabia monarchy fanboys, Bahrainian monarchy fanboys, death squad fanboys etc.

 

Since he's a linguist he can tell me the etymology of the string of curse words he's worth.

 

Who cares what he thinks?

 

The part about Chomsky being insane is my opinion. However, the part about him being Pol Pot's fanboy is a most unfortunate and inconvenient FACT.

Hearing what? That Chomsky is insane or that he was one of Pol Pot's fanboys?

It's no secret that Chomsky tried to discredit the witnesses fleeing the Khmer Rouge's Killing Fields. What kind of morally and mentally defective individual would do such a thing?

Now after that and his completely bogus accusations about the commission of a "silent genocide" in Afghanistan, we're supposed to believe that pseudo-intellectual charlatan's insane claim that the GOP is "literally a serious danger to human survival"?

What we have here is a classic case of projection. As an apologist for one of the worst mass murdering regimes in history, Chomsky and his ilk are literally a serious danger to human survival. Yet, he has the unmitigated gall to project his own sins on the people who oppose his lunatic Leftist fringe ideology and agenda that sent 100 million people to their graves and impoverished millions of others during the 20th Century. To make matters worse, that amoral, hypocritical piece of (*)(*)(*)(*) has never had the courage and decency to acknowledge and apologize for his complicity in that humanitarian catastrophe, as most socialists and communists have failed to do.

My heroes weren't even alive in the 20th Century, comrade. You get not one but two F's for eFFort.

 

Chomsky is correct. Hillary Clinton is the conservative, the Republican policy proposals so far have been very, very dangerous if followed.

 

I don't. I've listened to him before; but can't remember a thing he ever said.

 

I would vote for Trump if he signed a statement that he will deport Chomsky back to Russia.

 

The way I look at this, if Trump wins it will be because the Democrats decided to run Hillary Clinton against him. If Hillary wins, it will be because the Republicans decided to run Trump against her. There are your two evils in my book.

Both Trump and Hillary seemed loved withing their respective inner party circles. But not by those in the middle, the so called independents. Independents are giving both Trump and Hillary around a 60% unfavorable rating. Can't the two parties do better than these two?

 

LOLZ ~ (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*), now you're turning me into a Wannabe Trumpeteer.

 

Maybe a scandi-conservative. Not by American standards.

 

Chomsky needs to stick to linguistics, lol

 

Funny how you don't even offer sources or cite or use a bibliography to sustain your claims because you can not. LOL!!!

 

they are not a danger to mankinds survivability, maybe to mankinds sanity, but not survivability.

 

Obviously since it's a topic of discussion here.

 

No he is a radical left nutter.

 

I concede, that's a good point!

 

Knock yourself out, Chomskyite:

The Chomsky Hoax
http://www.paulbogdanor.com/chomskyhoax.html

You've got a lot of reading to do - have a great weekend. ROFL!!!

 

As long as he meant it literally I guess...

 

At least Chomsky knows where Pol Pot came from:

"PHILOSOPHER and linguist Noam Chomsky says the United States owes Cambodia not only an apology but massive reparations for the B-52 bombing campaign called Operation Menu that killed up to a million people.

"The campaign lasted from March 18, 1969, to May 26, 1970, destroyed an estimated 1,000 towns and villages, displaced 2 million people and, Chomsky says, and helped bring the Khmer Rouge to power.

"Chomsky’s comments come after the US last week ruled out a plea from Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen to forgive a US$317 million debt to the US accrued by the Lon Nol regime during the 1970s.

"In the interview, Chomsky said: 'Henry Kissinger would certainly be brought to trial for his role in the bombing, if the world were governed by justice, not forces.'”

http://www.phnompenhpost.com/national/noam-chomsky-maintains-rage

If Chomsky should apologize, then Kissinger should hang for his role in the Cambodian genocide.

 

Chomsky should have stayed in his field in the study of linguistics. Of course one does not become famous for being a linguist so I see why he talks about subjects he has no training for.