Cummings; classified emails found on personal accounts of Rice & Powell OOPS!

You think the average American's net worth is 500K ?? Wow.

 

Yeah I do.....just like you would to. So don't try to act like your any different. I play mopes like they deserve to be played. How you looking now.

 

It's easy to reject anything that doesn't fit your ideological partisan religion. The saddest part of watching liberals like you is that you defend a lying inept crook like Clinton, all while posting your support for Sanders. At least he's honest, and your posts would hold so much more validity if you knew the difference between honest and dishonest

 

Yes I do when you add in their house, their retirement, their cars and any other miscellaneous assets.

Sanders is 74,

http://www.fool.com/investing/gener...e-americans-net-worth-by-age-heres-where.aspx

 

Was John Dillenger a criminal? How about Johnson Wilkes Booth? How about the San Bernadino shooters?

Itbdoent require a convict for you to come to your own conclusion especially when it comes to electing that person to the Presidency.

 

Who's ?
10 char.

 

Again don't flatter yourself that we are seeking your love with all its not so charming arrogance.

 

Originally Posted by Bluesguy
Still waiting If they did as accused and they still retain any security clearance it should be immediately revoked and never reinstated and should they never be elected to a position having to do with national security. Don't you agree?

So you agree Hillary should not be elected President and hold those clearences and handle that information?

 

Here let me help you a little

"These are word games. First, under the law, nothing is “marked classified.” The markings are “confidential” or “secret” or “top secret,” and Mrs. Clinton knows this. Second, under the law, it is not the markings on the email headers that make the contents state secrets; it is the vulnerability of the contents of the emails to impair the government’s national security mission that rationally characterizes them as secrets.

Mrs. Clinton knows this because she signed an oath on Jan. 22, 2009, recognizing that state secrets retain their secrecy status whether “marked or unmarked” by any of the secrecy designations. She knows as well that, under the law, the secretary of state is charged with knowing state secrets when she comes upon them.

Yet, in order to further Mrs. Clinton’s deceptive narrative, the State Department had consistently claimed that it retroactively marked at least 1,300 emails as state secrets. It did this until last Friday.

That’s when the State Department revealed that 22 emails it found on Mrs. Clinton’s private server were in fact top secret, and were in fact marked top secret, and were in fact sent to or received from President Obama. This is a revelation that substantially undermines Mrs. Clinton’s political arguments and is catastrophic to her legal position.

Politically, Mrs. Clinton has lost the final argument in her public arsenal — that she did not recognize top-secret data unless it was marked as top secret. She has also lost the ability to claim, as she has repeatedly, that she neither sent nor received anything marked classified, as meaningless as that phrase is.

Legally, the ground under Mrs. Clinton continues to crumble. The more she denies, the more she admits. How can that be? That is so because her denials are essentially an admission of ignorance, forgetfulness or negligence, and, under the law, these are not defenses to the failure to safeguard state secrets entrusted to the secretary of state. They are, instead, recognition of that failure."

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/feb/3/andrew-napolitano-hillary-clinton-compromising-nat/

- - - Updated - - -

Hardly and still waiting

Originally Posted by Bluesguy
If they did mishandle classified information and they still retain any security clearance it should be immediately revoked and never reinstated and should they never be elected to a position having to do with national security.

Don't you agree?

 

I am so gratified by your forbearance. Of course your ignorance is another subject entirely.

 

Actually if you read the Emails on Clinton's server that supposedly contained the classified info they were sent by Blumenthal to Clinton, not the other way around.

 

Well you are right the Intellgence committee has seen the Emails but nobody else in a position to actually determine if the info was originally or retroactively classified, or whether the info should have even been retroactively classified, or if the info really had any significance whatsoever. Guess we will just have to wait and see .

And even the endless Republican witch hunt congressional commttees haven't blamed Clinton for the Benghazi deaths or even found any evidence that she lied or acted Inappropriately. But don't let facts or evidence get in the way of your having a good rant.

 

Here's your statement that said the average American has a net worth of five hundred thousand dollars.

No kidding. These lying POS is exactly the reason Americans are sick of lying corruption in politics. As much as Sanders is a nut with nutty ideas, at least he's honest. His net worth is somewhere in the neighborhood of $500K plus, which is no different than the average American.

Now perhaps you would like to try and find the data that shows the average American has a net worth of $500K plus.

 

lol. You can't possibly think we need you!

I'm pretty sure it was us who ran away from you.

 

Sorry but your statement was that Bernies $500K net worth is equal to that of the average family. If you had actually bothered to read the link you posted you would have read the following.

We estimate Bernie Sanders’ net worth at $528,014. That’s 7.8 times larger than the net worth of the median American family. However, since all senator net worths are estimates, it’s possible Bernie Sanders’ net worth is much lower. In fact, Bernie Sanders’ net worth could be as low as $222,026. That’s 3.3 times larger than the net worth of the median American family. Finally, the Bernie Sanders net worth average of $528,014 is about twice the net worth of others in his age group.

 

Yes that's how it started....then Hillary originated responses back. Which changes nothing about discussing classified info with Blumenthal who held no US security Clearance.

 

Well it appears that you did: http://www.nbcnews.com/id/9205201/n...s-eu-nato-emergency-katrina-aid/#.VrhgcxiLRkg
You're welcome.

 

Utter nonsense. Pointing out that other SoSs did the same thing is proof that the cons are wallowing in a dishonest witch hunt to smear Clinton's potus campaign, not that they also did something wrong.

 

Confession is good for the soul.

 

So if the information that Blumenthal sent to Hillary was classified there are two issues that come to mind. If Blumenthal had classified information from where did he obtain that information? And two if the classified information was already widely available to people without security clearance why should it have ever been classified in the first place?

 

None of that matters when Blumenthal is asking questions of Hillary and Hillary responds back. Telling Blumenthal what took place, or times, or the names of who was around at the time. She is to discuss nothing Classified with him. As he has no clearance.

The classified material in the email that Guccifer took a snapshot of, when he hacked into Blumenthals and Hillarys accounts. Was Classified and not even the MS Media, the Press, nor anyone other than The French and Hillary knew that the French Had sent in an Operative from the DSGE to set up the Libyan TNC that failed.

So bottomline.....Hillary has no excuses, and now that the State Dept has been busted out for trying to give her cover. Their Next!

 

Admission bolded for you.

 

Kind of expected.The State dept. is still uncovering and/or holding back
on ALL Ms.Clinton's E-mails.But there seems to be no problem drudging up
a FEW if not just TWO or so E-mails from former Republican Secretary of State.
To be expected.

 

So what? Rice did not use email and neither had their own personal server. Intent is the difference here.

 

Try as they may there has never been the vast sort of Breaking of Protocol
and outright Illegal use of E-mail access and transmission as demonstrated
by Shyster Lawyer Hillary Clinton.All the Clintons Spin Doctors are no where to be
found.Even those dopey enough to ruin their careers like Ann Lewis and Doug
Hattaway and Julian Epstein.Maybe even Lanny Davis.Constantly imploring how
honest and above board them Clintons.And how decent and Nice also.
That isn't even comical.That is absurd to the point of pathetic.
The Clintons have been getting away with who they really are since Slick Willy
got Elected his 2nd time around.At Least Bill Clinton's Rack Star appeal among
democrats is fading faster than a sundown in Alaska's winter.