Salon writer admits he's a pedophile

Also, prison would be no picnic when they find out he did something with a five year old girl.

They'd put a shank in his bunk and tell him to do it himself or they'd do it for him.

 

I'll defer to the expert.

Nugent it appears sang about Ephebophilia


What do you you think about pedophiles writing for Salon? Do you support that?

 

That's why Jared the Subway pedo is getting his ass kicked constantly in prison from what I've heard.

 

I suspect there is more to it than that.
He's a writer? Do you have any idea how well true crime books sell in the US with sick pictures and a detailed account of the unthinkable details recounted by the convict?
Sick sells. It is the train wreck that we can't look away from.
Lolita is about a middle aged man lusting for an adolescent girl. It's considered important enough literature to include it in many a high school lit class.
Men do, frequently, fantasize about female minors. And girls frequently fantasize about much older males.

 

Wow

Defending a pedophile.

 

Or maybe it will make him more edgy, mysterious, and interesting...
When I think about how long Jerry Springer has been airing, not much surprises me... You'd think by now his circus act would be old...
Parents just don't ask 18 year old guys to babysit their young daughters much. At all. Like almost never. So that he'd even be in that position is suspect.
But since we're on the topic... Why is it common for girls to lust after older males and men after girls?

 

Why Nugent? Haha...
The Police sang Don't Stand so Close...
Do you think Nugent or The Police has more influential music?

- - - Updated - - -

Yeah, that made for an awesome meme. Know it?

 

Nabukov's book was prevalent because it was an example of an Elektra Complex by proxy.

Normal men do not fantasize about female minors. That's liberal infirmity in praxis to suggest that they do.

My ex and her friends left me in charge of 8 year old girls on several occasions. I got a consensus of what they wanted to do, and we did it by popular vote. The vote resulted in making cookies with decorations and watching some mermaid movie. Sex never entered my mind. That would have been beyond ghoulish. Nonetheless, it entered that Salon.com potential felon's mind.

But if a 23 year old girl wants to fellate me on a one off, sure. She's 23, not 5. See the difference, moonbats. Know that you should offer guidance, not sex, to preteens.

 

No. Feel free to post it here though, especially if it's funny.

 

no one wants their picture with the guy now, think he has had his last Presidential photo



.

 

Heh, at least Bush is out in public with him, and not standing in front of a room that says Private Do Not Enter

I don't even want to know what the hell went on in there.





I bet some Salon writers were in there "interviewing" Obama.

 

Well, let's let you moonbats run with the ball.

Would you liberals let the Salon.com underage girl fan do what he wants? Maybe he's already done so. Is that your goal? Do what thou wilt, so mete it be?

 

Tread carefully, moonbats.

 

Why did you sit the gaggle of girls? Where were their dads?
Evidently you don't indulge much in porn...
"Barely legal" is all over it. School girl strippers,
American Beauty, hello.
Brooke Shields was like 13-14 when she starred in Blue Lagoon and modeled for sexually suggestive Calvin Klein ads.
If you wanna stamp it sick and not dig a little deeper, that's expected because it's taboo even though we're surrounded by it and men especially can be crucified for breaching the topic.

 

not sure what you mean, are you thinking we should have thought police and arrest people for thinking about committing a crime

I think we can all agree he should be fired for his disgusting comments, but as of yet we know of no actual crime having been committed

.

 

It's the FBI taskforce bout to raid with the caption "They went to Jared's"
Completely lost on most here. Do you get it?

 

But, Salon hasn't fired him, and won't.

Salon supports pedophiles

- - - Updated - - -

Not really

I guess you have to see it.


.

 

Dude, lusting after teenage girls is skeevy for adults, but yeah, it happens more often than not in society, probably

But, we're talking about pedophilia

That's a grown man wanting to have sex with a pre-pubescent child

The Salon writer wants to have sex with little children.

He's a pedophile, and Salon chooses to keep him writing there, providing an outlet for his sick thoughts

Stay on topic.

 

I bet they will, took the church awhile to fire actual child molesters but once the public found out they did the right thing

but I could be wrong, I do not read articles on the site, so not sure what they are about......

.

 

At work, I had the time free and wasn't at work.

Your infirmity of mind is exemplified by that statement in relation to the babysitting of underage girls.

Not trying to hear that hello.

Nah. We're not culpable. Welcome to the world, kid. It's seething with moonbat liberals who would like to point the finger at others for their deviant notions. You're done. Next.

 

I bet they won't. Liberals tend to defend deviants.

Gay Catholic priests are a small number compared to all the pedos that are behind the scenes in Hollywood. An ex-child actor named Corey Feldman has recently exposed Hollywood's huge pedophile problem for child actors

Bill Clinton took 26 trips to a convicted pedophile's private island.


.

 

It's not funny unless you've lived in the US for the last decade.

 

Let me just say there's something very grotesque about fantasizing over a child. The litany of problems, not the least the consent. But who the HELL would be sexually aroused by a kid? A child is NOT sexually developed. That's why there kids. I never use the word "beautiful" to describe a kid. Cute. Sure. Some were even a bit cuddly, teddy bear style. But a kid should only be showered with platonic parental-type caring love.

 

So they kept him on...why?
Sick sells. Big.
What's your hypothesis regarding their retention of him?

 

Of course you, being a supposedly "schoolly" moonbat, don't know what I mean. Your knowledge of ramifications seems to be in severe deficit when it comes to being indicted. That's because you liberals engender crime to a preposterous degree. But do go on with your conditionally feigned lack of understanding of the situation. I find it amusing.

Oh, you find it "disgusting". That's good. Voltaire said "I disagree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".

So, then you would have no problem with a Nazi parade? Would you seek to silence the participants?

Let's not jerk each other around. You would say nothing to suppress his comments.

In law, actions are nothing if the conditions to effect them are impossible. If someone were to say "I'd shoot you if I were a black person", and the speaker were white, the threat carries no weight in court.

This is a different story. You know it. Stop playing around and admit it.