Gingrich- Trump's remarks about judge a "mistake", "inexcusable"

Imagine the irony if President Hillary were to appoint Gonzalo Curiel as a Supreme Court justice?

 

My question is broader: Why did Trump feel the need to publicly weigh in on this at all? Does it help, or hurt, his campaign? He has a higher calling than running his enterprise now. If he's elected POTUS, I expect him to spend 100% of his time running our country, and not his own personal enterprises. Is that an unreasonable expectation? Should I be concerned about his apparent inability to delegate the handling of this frivolous and trivial lawsuit, while he SHOULD be focusing 100% of his attention on dropping the house on the wicked witch? He needs to press the damn Turbo button, here.

 

Clearly Newt is part of La Raza.

 

1-La Raza Lawyers Association, opposes "the wall" since they openly promote illegal immigration and the membership 100% Hispanic, have a record of defending illegal immigration.

2-In this case, a non political person never having donated money or promoting a principle (defendant) of the opposition.

I'd would still appreciate an answer to my original questions...which in itself answers your questions. It's just not logical to expect a persons political opinions, based on childhood, when offering a domestic legal opinion. That works both ways and why Jury members are questioned at length, but remember Judge Cases are randomly picked, or supposed to be.....

 

The LA Raza Movement was around way before the "National Council" was formed... You should have stuck with your admittance of not having a clue about the topic...

Keep digging a larger hole to climb out of.

 

most of the republican party thinks this but won't say it, i don't understand why newt gingrich who is a disgruntled liberal turned republican like Trump, won't agree with Trump on this.

they both capitalize on the oppressed white voter base of the conservatives.

 

Affiliate's. There is no wall between them. He should have recused himself, that not happening Trump should have asked for his recusal and taken it over his head to get that.

They BOTH are wrong, the judge for not recusing himself Trump for not proper going through the channels to get him off the lawsuit and instead making his public spectacle about it.

 

E

And links. Why would you leave out that part?

 

Affiliates and their links. They associate themselves as opposed to statements otherwise such as yours

You can withdraw your fallacious statement of fact now.

 

Except it says links AND affiliates. You're claiming la Raza runs the Hispanic chamber of commerce??? Source?

 

Trump's been dealing with this guy for a year and thinks this guy is biased because of his decisions -- Trump has inferred bias from his decisions, not his race.

 

Yes it list them and their links, you can click on any of the links and get there and they are certainly associated were you fallaciously stated there was NO ASSOCIATION. Being affliliated with or association which does not apply one runs the other.

Stop digging your hole and withdraw your claim

Wrong they associate themselves.

 

You do know that the Judge Curiel is NOT a member of the La Raza National Council don't you? So goes your argument.

- - - Updated - - -

They do NOT. La Raza Lawyers organization does NOT affiliate with the La Raza National Council.

http://www.nclr.org/affiliates/affiliates-by-region/california/

This is a link to La Raza National Council Affiliates in CA.

 

The claim was there is no ASSOCIATION and that is clearly wrong as shown on their webpage.

 

What are you talking about. I gave you a link to the La Raza National Council. NO AFFILIATION. Here is a link to the La Raza Lawyers Group...

http://larazalawyers.net/id3.html

Again NO AFFILIATION. Please provide your proof of this ridiculous claim or admit that it is a false claim. There is NO CONNECTION.

 

Assumes facts NOT in evidence.

Tr(oll)mp never mentioned any decisions, only that he was "Mexican", and he doubled down by disqualifying Muslim judges who aren't even dealing with his case.

 

A Trump White Horse souse says “acting presidential” is an offering to Veritas.

Considering the pact with you, that if the Republicans have not impeached the emperor I can’t vote for them anyway, I consider this a get out of barfing free card.

Like when I said Obama deserved to win after McCain couldn’t in three debates say (when goaded by Obama to answer) why invasion without WMD, when I constantly argued (even before the invasion) it was a WAR ON TERROR.

It looks like Clinton deserves to win.

First Amendment:

"The United States deplores any intentional effort to denigrate the religious beliefs of [those that believe the wooden horse is an offering to the goddess Athena]." (Clinton)

 

There are more groups then just the National Council... Nice attempt to deflect and defend racism though.. clap clap.

 

HA! This keeps circling my brain every few weeks and I've been trying to ignore that Trump just might be trolling the entire electorate. Just about the time I think he's not, he does something like this and I see Trump hair on the troll face meme again.

 

When Trump loses Newt as an apologist....you KNOW how badly Hair Furor screwed up.

- - - Updated - - -

RP's "linkages" would try to convince you that Bear Bryant was "Yogi Bear's cousin."



- - - Updated - - -

It gets to a certain point where you HAVE to say EITHER-

A. Trump is a totally politically/morally tone-deaf moron...

or B. Trump may actively be sabotaging his own campaign because he actually DOESN'T want to win in November.


And only his Cultists don't see it.

 

"I'm building a wall... he's a Mexican"

An inference of bias stemming from race couldn't be clearer.

 

I used Wiki and their own sites to document it do you have an issue with that?

 

La Raza Lawyers Association is not part of National Council on La Raza.


And as I said, even Trump cheerleaders like Gingrich called his comments "inexcusable"....or (as Mello Guy said)..

is Newt part of "La Raza" now???

 

Mellow claimed there is no ASSOCIATION, their website shows that is false. They associate with each other.

- - - Updated - - -

You said there is no association that is false they associate.

 

I never claimed it.. So why you think you score points by spamming it is beyond me.. Oh thats right its all you have at this point.