Gingrich- Trump's remarks about judge a "mistake", "inexcusable"

No, you tried to insinuate it by saying "Curiel" and "La Raza" in a post....trying to infer he was in "National Council on La Raza".

It's the sort of "lie by half-truth" that is popular on Rightwing Radio, Drudge, Breitbart, and Fox News.


But curious.....what is your opinion of what Newt said? Don't believe you've actually said yet?

- - - Updated - - -

I said "LRLA is not part of NCLA"....is that true?

 

Nope i did no such thing.. The Council is hardly all of "La Raza" as has been explained to you which you have ignored.. You have already admitted you know nothing about the topic so just repeating the same nonsense is all you have left it appears. Ah yes the "right wing source" talking point which has already been gone over to death in this thread but hey when you have nothing why not just keep repeating the same falsehoods eh Gorn?

Newt is a political creature. It wouldnt surprise me he would support La Raza if he felt it would gain him anything. Tomorrow he might disdain them.. its what Newt does.

 

How many genuine 'facts' have you heard from Trump? Seems like most of them are lies, exaggeration and vacuous promises (sorry, 'suggestions').

 

Plenty of information on the topic has been gone over on this site in the last couple of days.. If you chose to ignore it well that is on you.

 

Has Trump any practical, workable solutions for making America "great again"-or have you been wowed by empty rhetoric which just sounds good?

 

Just a week ago, he was Trump's biggest cheerleader...on the Short List for Veep.....and all the Trump Cultists at Breitbart were ending their comments with

"Trump/Gingrich 2016" sign-offs.

Now, he DARES to criticize The Furor....and he's "supporting Latino racists" and a "traitor", huh?

 

Gingrich has gone from +125 to +500 to be Trump's VP on Sportsbook which is the same as Sessions. Palin is next at +800, then Kasich at +1000. Ernst and Corker are at +1500. I personally like Corker at +1500. I'd be surprised if Gingrich is Trump's VP after this. Trump takes loyalty very seriously.

 

Heritage is not the same as nationality. You, irrespective of your heritage, are an American national the same way that I, despite having had both parents born in Poland, am a British national.

 

Its Newt.... So do you have a point with all this?

 

Let me get this straight. You are defending a guy that believes it is impossible for a U.S. Federal Judge to perform his duties because of is ethnic heritage and I am the one that is defending racism? You must live in opposite world.

So tell me what racist group is Judge Curiel a member of?

- - - Updated - - -

Please provide a link or a picture to the fact that they are associated groups. They are NOT associated groups. The only false claim here is yours.

There is NO ASSOCIATION between the two groups. Please provide proof of your claim that they are associated.

 

I never said it was because of his Heritage.. Its because of his ties to La Raza.

My posts throughout have been clear so the only reason to keep repeating falsehoods is its all you have at this point.

 

Did Trump say "La Raza".....or did Trump say "Mexican"?

(Dodge....please? )

- - - Updated - - -

So is Trump's OWN New York chair, Joe Borelli, who called Trump's comment "stupid"....


"in with La Raza", too???

 

http://larazalawyers.net/id3.html

Under links and associations you have National Council of La Raza

Also you have San Diego La Raza Lawyers

San Diego La Raza Lawyers is part of The Chicano/Latino Bar Association of California which is associated with National Council of La Raza

This is all information on THEIR OWN SITE.

- - - Updated - - -

I am giving you information directly about this group and all you want to do is play he said she said games? Sorry that does not invalidate the simply information about the La Raza Movement.

 

Did Trump say "La Raza"....or did he say "Mexican" referring to Judge Curiel?


(Dodge again, please. )

 

Curiel is in fact Mexican... no dodge.. You claiming i am and constantly moving the goal posts does not make it a dodge nor does littering your posts with emoticons ~

 

I have always called Newt a back stabbing opportunist. That bastard orchestrated a mass exodus of conservatives from congress that handed it over to Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid.

 

It's as absolutely appropriate to question whether a judge could be impartial considering purported ties to a racist, pro Mexican organization, given that Trump
has been very critical towards Mexico and it's enabling of illegal immigration.

A judge with ties to the Klan would face the same questions from the people now critical of Trump if he was presiding over a Black Lives Matter type black defendant. As usual the left is able to cry wolf whenever it suits their politicized agenda.

 

Nice common sense... I guess its more fun though to talk about Nazi's or Hannity or other nonsense.

 

How did Newt do that, when the GOP lost the House in 2006.....and Newt left Congress in 1999?

 

Did Trump say "La Raza"....or did he say "Mexican" referring to Judge Curiel?

 

The topic is larger then one quote something you seem to struggle with.

 

Let's see how many times you can dodge a simple, direct question.....because it doesn't "fit" with your "revised" version of events-


Did Trump say "La Raza"....or did he say "Mexican" referring to Judge Curiel?

 

He said Mexican which he is.. The Judge is also part of La Raza... try to keep up. Nothing "revised" or "dodged" here as you KEEP trying to claim.. Why such dishonesty?

 

So Trump was "talking about his heritage"?

YOU are trying to change it to "talking about La Raza"?

Correct?

 

Nope as a I realize the topic is larger then one quote... Are you really going to spend another 15 pages claiming posters said something they didnt and then demand they defend your false claims? Or after 15 pages are you finally able to discuss the topic?