You by default deny the evidence and proof of evolution. Now that unto itself does not other me. What does is your insults specific to those who actually look at the science and math. AA
What ever literate individual could even think that the independent observer in the text you quoted was me? Only a believer in evolution. but on other hand believers in evolution do not exist as individuals. They always have to form in a gang. Also you missed not. oh, you made a correction. Listen try to be accurate. The fact is not that I do not believe in empirical evidence of evolution, the fact is I believe in no evidence except in forensic and even there I am never in a rush. Understand? No evidence is accepted in this window and no logic.Look at the sign over the window, it is printed in bold letters. Go to religious theologians. The 3rd window on the left. I have been posting here like crazy and if you bothered you would see detailed, with examples and references explanations why. Because you have decided how science should be conducted to fit your religious beliefs does not mean that anybody should accept your rules and your beliefs. I live in America the land of free. BTW the subject of this tread is...
So, you cannot point me denying anything in this tread. Just making things up. And you cannot point to any math in the belief that evolution is a fact. But you believe somebody can deny something which does not exist. it is quite a belief, but one causes another, no surprise.
evolutionists always get reduced to trolling and do not exist as individuals, but only in gangs. I am here to demonstrate this fact.
I have already done so on this thread and several others. The Viral within the Genomes of all life details of a specific Viral DNA encoding that is one in the same within all life. This exists on a Molecular/Atomic Level which is tantamount to a Mathematical Proof. AA
You have posted a bunch of disconnected words in English in sentences carrying no meaning. It is clear that you don't know what math is. No believer in evolution does. Darwin couldn't do or understand basic math. Obviously when one cannot do or understand math one becomes an evolutionist. Have you ever seen something like this: ? It was a rhetorical question. Obviously no evolutionist can make out any math.
You have absolutely no idea what I am talking about do you? I am talking about the specific Genetic Viral DNA encoding in the genomes of all life. First of all you might first familiarize yourself with GATCA. Then the Telomere Algorithm....then perhaps brush up on the Periodic Table. AA
I do know that you are talking gibberish. I have posted a graphical illustration. You think that no if evolutionist can make out math, nobody can? Anyone who could pass a math class in a high school can see the difference between math content and no math content. But evolutionists can troll and form gangs. They don't care.
LOL!! WOW!! Your level of ignorance as far as as this goes is stunning!! I will let your post speak for itself! AA
Congratulations! I do know that all evolutionists will confirm that you posted a math content and you and other evolutionists did it a number of times on this tread and it all shows appearance of new species out of previous ones or at least is related to claims of evolution. And I know that they all truly believe in that. This is one of specifics of the belief in evolution. Who can blame the chemist that he did not want to get in any debate?
This thread reminds me of what creationists are trying to do to the public school system. This thread belongs in the religion forum.
it is quite a disconnect between your conclusion and the text you quoted. Can you present your chain of reasoning which led you from the text you quoted to the conclusion you made? Or it is just usual for believers in evolution to spew out some contempt then cannot hold to themselves?
You're the one who's not understanding the article, and not getting what he's saying. He's not the only one. THAT'S THE POINT! No one really understand it! Not even evolutionists! So far, no scientists had come forward to explain it to him. You'd think that evolutionists would jump at that publicly posted expose' about scientists and macro evolution.....you'd think someone would be quick to challenge and correct him on that, and would publicly explain it to him, too! I was expecting Dawkins to be leading the pack in giving explanations regarding those extrapolations from micro evolution to macro! So you're saying the science community is peopled by idiots! Then, why do atheists like Dawkins look to science?
Everything he's quoted for, has been from his website. Read it! http://www.jmtour.com/personal-topi...-the-christian-creationist-and-his-“science”/ Sure, other Christian sites had quoted him. Why can't they? He offered his permission to be quoted! You're giving arguments that are not being argued. I didn't say he believes in ID. Actually, I don't think he said he didn't believe in creationism - in fact, this statement suggests he does believe in creation: So, that's another reading incomprehension on your part! Furthermore, it's not his expertise as a scientist that's being given here as an argument. It's his bafflement, along with all the scientists that he'd asked - all equally baffled like him - about the extrapolation from microevolution to macro! Regarding debates......here is what he said about debates: He is not a debator like Dawkins, or William Lane Craig, or Lennox, etc.. who are invited in venues to participate in public debates. He doesn't want to participate in those kinds of debates. But he is giving his views, and discussing them in his site......and had given permission to be freely quoted about them (provided they are not taken out of context). We're discussing his article right now. As for the rest of your post ......it exploded in senseless rant. In other words, you can't support your claim about him. The challenge to provide support for your claim seems to be the trigger that's made you come unhinged! I don't have time for your bs! Here's my standard response for posters like you. Bye bye for now. I'll get back to you when you have something worth responding to.
James Tour did not only write the article.....he goes out publicly speaking and taunting about it! He's definitely thrown the challenge to the science community! He's got them good, and he knows it! He said: The atheist society contacted me, they said that they would buy the lunch, and they challenged the atheist society, "go down in Houston and have lunch with this guy and talk to him." NOBODY'S COME! [video=youtube;_TAUw4pvbug]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_TAUw4pvbug[/video]
From a secular Jewinsh upbringing to Christianity: starts at timer 5:07, he gives his awesome testimony..... [video=youtube;pR4QhNFTtyw]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pR4QhNFTtyw[/video] The uplifting of burden - the sense of presence - was felt by many converts, or those born-again.
And in a black hole where time and space as we understand it ceases to exist and even the nuclear structure ceases to exist.....? So we create mathematical axioms based upon assumptions and we don't know if the math is right or not because it's all based upon assumption. If we change the assumptions then the axioms change and that will effect the results of the calculations.
There's no science in the Bible and obviously he's abandoned science for his religious beliefs. That explains everything.
