Stanford Rape Case:Doesn't modern day, 3rd wave feminism have to share some blame?

This unfortunate event got feminists all over the world triggered hard.

I'm in no way defending the rapist. He deserve a much more harsh punishment IMO. But how the young women got herself in such a ... precarious position is equally questionable.

Here is a quote from wiki:

Now I don't know how much a girl need to drink to get knocked out "unconscious", I'm pretty sure before the 3rd, may be 2nd wave feminist movement, it was completely unacceptable for young girls to mess around with someone like that. Now it completely is acceptable. In fact, if you don't act promiscuously in college, you will be ostracized and laughed at. You will have a "reputation" for being no "fun". Why is that?

Young college girls nowadays pursuit sexual pleasures like men. Feminism used to be flying into space just like men, operating machinery just like men, running a company just like men, now it seems that a significant amount of weight was shift towards being obsessed with the hook-up culture just like men. Girls nowadays it seems, are much less selective about their partners, either when it comes to who they are, or how they behave.

I have a niece graduating college very soon. I can only pray she doesn't get in trouble, because to her, I'm a historic relic that doesn't know how to have fun.

Funny it's feminists swinging the stick these days bashing anyone who dares to point out their moral paradoxes.

 

So if you passed out at a party, or fainted or otherwise became incapacitated you would share some blame if you were raped?

 

It appears that's what he's saying

 

If she can't say yes, figure it's a no.

3rd-wave or no 3rd-wave.

 

1st, I wouldn't drink, not that much. Maybe it's because it's the south but I had never been to one of those "wild" parties. California isn't everywhere.

2nd. I would have certain sensors hard-wired in my mind actively measuring my state of soberness. If I were too drunk, I would have early warnings popping up all over my radar alerting me of possible sexual foul play.

Last, but not least, I didn't said anything about blaming the victim. I'm blaming the feminist movement. The girl could be dating, or fooling around with this creep because of sheer peer pressure. She could be just wanting to show her friends that she gets to date an athlete of the American national team.

I think it takes at least 1/2 bottle of vodka to stone someone cold.

- - - Updated - - -

There we go. That's enough to get the circle-jerking started.

- - - Updated - - -

It's 2016, in Obama's America.

Your rules may not apply.

 

Do you wear a tin foil hat?

 

You may want to learn a little more about feminism.

And maybe a few other things too.

 

Wuuuh, what? What does that have anything to do with anything?

Earth to Doug, we are talking about the Stanford rape, not government surveillance.

- - - Updated - - -

It's not my fault.

Feminists did a spectacular job leaving people with the impression that it's all about sex, fat-pride, jazz hand and dye your hair in 16 different colors.

 

`
`
No. The idea is almost insane.

 

Yes, he has much to learn.

Feminism only produces good results. If the results are not good, it is men's fault.

It is, for instance, men's fault that women are unhappier due to feminism.

The most important point is that women never, never, have any responsibility when things go wrong.

Compare with Black people. If a black kid shoots black people, it is white people's fault. Heck, if a black kid shoots white peope, it is the white people's fault. I am not sure how this works if the white people in question were women. Probably in that case it is my fault.

Note well, if Sander's supporters beat up Trump supporters, it is Trump's fault.

Getting the hang of it now?

 

Yes; I believe men should not have to lie for sex in modern times.

 

Let's ask the question in a different way.

If America's attitude towards inter-sexual relations now were that of 60 years ago, do you think the girl would let the pervert feel up on her?

I don't think so. I think he will most likely end up with a red palm print in his cheek.

Although I don;t deny in this hypothetical scenario, things could have gotten much worse, as in it turned into something much more violent. But reading that wiki page led me to believe the perp is no more than a typical wuss.

I think America's college kids nowadays are really pathetic. The whole thing strike me as really sad. In every possible way. Almost absurd.

Thanks LBJ, Thanks Obama.

 

The mistake feminists make is thinking rapists are moral people who can be trained to be moral. This is utter nonsense. Rapists are sexual predators, sociopaths who are void of morals or a consciousness. Feminism teaches women that they are void of responsibility in anything. That women can drink as much as they want, to behave as they want, to dress how they want - and that there should be no consequences to those actions.

Feminism has hurt women more than anyone else. Feminism is a social cancer. This woman is easy prey for a rapist - and she bears some responsibility for putting herself in that position.



Women should be taught that it is smart to protect themselves and not drink alone and wear slutty outfits and not to drink to the point of passing out.

 

Is it wrong to simply ask some women, if they want someone to scratch their rump?

 

Obama is to blame for die hard racists going nuts because he is black and feminists are responsible for rapists assaulting women because they are women. Argle bargle nonsense

 

What if we claim, for the sake of argument, that might makes right for less political animals. Why do women feel the need to insist we lie for sex and imperil the greater glory of our immortal souls as a result.

The moral of True Witness bearing is just as timeless as any other commandment.

So,

when are women going to insist on simply and merely, fornicating men into relationships?

 

Can you restate/reword this ? I have no idea what you're asking in this post.

 

women are being disingenuous by artificially creating scarcity.

 

`
What an absolutely repulsive answer but seeing that the thread is repulsive, it attracts the same kind of people. The problem, is that you can't argue with people whom have reached a certain level of human dysfunctional, so why bother?

 

i like to repeat, historical sexual mistakes with women, and claim I am not really like that, afterward?

 

The thread premise was offensive and absurd, and it managed to go downhill from there...

 

If you put yourself in a precarious position, you must accept the consequences of your actions.

Rock climbing. Cliff diving. Deep sea diving. Doing drugs. Drinking so much you pass out at a party. When you choose to do dangerous or stupid things, bad things can happen.

Only the young and ignorant blame others when bad things happen due to stupid choices. There is a fairly nonexistent chance you'll get raped at a party when you're sober and with friends.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

I agree to not complain if modern women want to practice modern, sexual, supply side economics with me, not Only for practice but also for fun.

 

There is never a justification for rape.

 

Feminism is not to blame for this rape. Even non-feminists agree you don't sleep with someone who is not conscious.

3rd wave feminists are guilty of blaming men for all their problems though. If 2 people drink and consent to conscious sex, the 3rd wave feminist says the guy raped the woman, and the woman did not rape the man.