Donald Trump is a Zionist

Hillary's dilemma is that liberals are morally obliged to oppose Zionism. If Hillary sends American troops to fight another war for Israel it will destroy liberals faith in the democratic party. And that could expose Jews to criticism from the left.

That is why we have Donald Trump. Israel needs a republican president to do their dirty work.

When Trump starts a war for Israel the left will say he's a white racist who hates Muslims. Some liberals will know that Trump is a Zionist and that white racism and Zionism are not the same thing. But they will go with the herd in condemning white people. And Jews will be safe.

The same thing happened in 2000. George W. Bush had to steal the election so he could go to war with Iraq. No one would have believed that Al Gore invaded Iraq to steal their oil for his family business. Israel needed a republican administration to fight the war on terror. The Jewish media did a very good job portraying Bush as a corrupt imbecile and a chickenhawk and most liberals bought it because they're stupid. Not as stupid as conservatives. But stupid enough.

 

*Securing tin foil hat*

Trump should go back to his job as starting quarterback for the Denver Broncos.

 

If Trump is a Zionist ... where is the problem?

On the contrary, I'm glad to discover this!

 

There was no war on terror in 2000.
For the Bush platform in 2000;
http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=25849

 

Good news for Trump then - he will get Ben Shapiro on his side.

 

A very interesting assessment of how the United States is being used by the Zionist and I can see the logic. However, my take is that from a Washington standpoint there is no meaningful difference between republicans and democrats on the matter supporting Zionism. In fact, at the end of every day they tell you as much. Neither side has any problem letting you know that "America will always support Israel." So, what's really going on in this "election" cycle.

I don't think for one minute that Trump is a conservative. In fact, there is more than enough evidence to convict him in a court of law as actually being a democrat - but I won't try that case here. I think Trump is the Trojan horse actor in all this. His quid pro quo role was more than likely to reach as deep inside the republican party as he could and then gut it from the inside out. He's done that very successfully. It will take eons for the republican party to recover from this - if it ever recovers from this to anything even remotely resembling its former self. In fact, I believe you are now witnessing the transformation of the republican party. The problem the republican will have during this transformation is that it will have people like Cruz and Ryan looking like geniuses within the party for not supporting Trump, but in broader America those two will not be able to sell a new more centrist republican brand.

Zionist had a plan for the use of false flags to enter Iran and then to sequentially use that as leverage for taking out Syria entirely. In fact, we already know that was the plan during the Bush 43 administration and we know that it was Zionists who created and steered that plan to coincide with the timeline of 911. There is factual evidence for this and I've posted it on this forum. You can't have another republican sending the country to war so soon after Afghanistan/Iraq. This is the mission of Trump. To make the notion of a republican president so unappealing that nobody other than the most diehard core right wing nut extremists would find solace in such a notion. Again, Trump has been highly successful in fulfilling this mission and he will be tremendously rewarded for it backstage an unseen by the general public, if he has not been so rewarded already.

Clinton, is a CFR clone and she's in the pocket of the Zionist. She supported the war in Iraq and Afghanistan, neither of them were justified based on the actual evidence. She would be just as usable to the Zionists as Bush 43. Mark my words, there will be some kind of incident (aka False Flag Operation) that sends the United States into Iran under Clinton. Neocons still own and operate the shadow government including all of the para-military personnel who run operations behind the scenes in places like Iraq, Afghanistan, Egypt, Syria, etc., in conjunction with those operations of the joint CIA/MI6 units. All of it used to destabilize nations for the purpose of shaping foreign policy. Rest assured that when called upon, Clinton will respond as CINC and do whatever her puppet masters require with respect to Iran.

Obama, has taken care of Egypt and Libya for the Zionists and has initiated Syria. This is an ongoing process that does not get done under one administration. Hillary, is next and I predicted her 2016 election on another forum back in 2008. I also predicted in 200, immediately after the rigged (Ohio/Florida) election of Bush 43, that both Syria and Iran would be destabilized. Iran, will be the last to fall because unlike the others it has a real Military to content with and the are going to need a real coalition to bring it down. Expect that coalition to be built under Clinton 45.

Zionism is the world's scourge. But, it is not necessarily Zionist in and of itself that is so horrible, though it is horrific. It's the way in which Zionists have gone about hiding their true identity over the centuries and the extent to which they have stolen, rewritten and corrupted the real history and shattered the lives of the descendants of those who existed on this planet for thousands of years before them that bothers me the most. Wherever they have been on this planet they have wreaked havoc and brought total chaos.

They represent the truest and purest form of evil in the entire Universe. So much so, that I even question (with scientific probes) whether or not their origin is even part of our world.

 

LOL, from HillaryClinton.com

Hillary Clinton and Israel: A 30-Year Record of Friendship, Leadership, and Strength

 

Well, then they screwed up in yet another way.. Only recently had Iraqi oil come back after 13 years in the crapper.. I suppose none of these neocon halfwits knew that the oil business hates a war zone.

 

There is one important difference between republicans and democrats and that is voters expectations. Democrats are supposed to be the good guys. If Hillary/Obama starts a major war for Israel it would be too much for the antiwar liberals to tolerate. They would be morally obliged to oppose the war and it could divide the democratic party and create liberal factions openly critical of Jewish political power. And that is very bad. Liberals who know how to organize a boycott of Israeli products (BDS) are a much bigger threat to Jewish political power than alt-right Nazis who hate Jews.

This is why Israel wants a republican president. And the election has been fixed for Trump to win. Cruz and Jeb Bush were there to make Trump look good and create his image as a populist. And Hillary is despised by her own party. Bernie saw to that.

Trump will be the next President. And when he invades Iran and treats Muslim-Americans unjustly it will reinforce the left's image of him as a white bigot. The left will remain united in their opposition to Trump and won't have to acknowledge that their own side has always supported Israel. Hillary's support for Gulf War 2 will remain their quiet little secret.

 

so basically you're saying is "blame the Jews"

and btw, Zionism has only existed since maybe 1890, so this talk about "Zionists over the centuries" is clearly just a mask for "Jews".

 

Of course, its the global jewish conspiracy writ large.

All too real a belief to be laughable but here goes:

[video]https://youtu.be/tyT5scEWJJU[/video]

 

There has been a 'war on terror' since the 1960s and 1970s. The hypocrisy has been the fact that the enemy combatants were mostly White and living in the United States and Europe. So, they did not call it an outright "war on terror" back then and the enemy combatants were considered "Revolutionaries." This is what happens in a paradigm that perpetuates the notion of White Supremacy and fosters White Privilege.

The Weather Underground has killed more people and caused more damage on US soil than all so-called Radical Islamist Terrorists combined. When you toss in the IRA in Europe, the death toll soars and the physical damage pales in comparison. And, those are just two of the real Terrorists having struck on Western Soil.

How we so easily forget our history when the shoe is on the other foot.

Terrorism and the 'war on it' has radically changed. When Whites use terror it is seen as "Revolution" and something to be "concerned about." When Muslims use terror it is seen as "Radical" and something to "wage war against."

Of course, we are the land of hypocrites, so none of this history repeating itself should be all that shocking.

 

Notice how the "Chairman Worldwide Jewish Media Conspiracy" had his name plaque dominant in most of the frames. Coincidence, or a real Worldwide Jewish Media Conspiracy? My vote would be: Not a mere coincidence.

If I can get you to laugh and not take seriously what I'm actually doing to you, then I'm more than halfway home.

 

It was much worse in the 60-80's. I have made that point repeatedly on this forum when people (*)(*)(*)(*) their pants over Muslims.
The difference is that Europeans treat it as crime and not war. The US is a country that likes to declare war on things. Whether it's poverty, drugs or terrorism.

Terrorism is not a existential threat to any state in Europe. Arguably it was during the left and right terrorism of the past.

Still... There was no war on terrorism before Bush and ergo my post stands. Your post is a bungled mess with little historic veracity...

 

Yuk yuk yuk.

Doing to me? Now that is hilarious.

I suggest you go all the way.

 

Though I don't disagree with your underlying premise that America picks and chooses its "wars" and those things it deems as an existential threat, I think your idea that there was no "war on terror" during the period I refer to misses the point that history has made time and time again:

[video=youtube;uiAbHmwIwGs]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uiAbHmwIwGs[/video]

"...I'm going to read a declaration of a state of war..."

"...This system is going to be overthrown. It's gonna mean a fight. I's gonna mean a lot of White people risking a lot of things..."

"...Within the next 14 days, we are going to attack a {inaudible} institution of American injustice.."

And, this whopper of a statement heard at time = 1:30:

"...There's no way to be committed to non-violence in the middle of the most violent society that history has ever created. I'm not committed to non-violence in any way..."


It is amazing how when you actually study history that bungled mess with little historic veracity is exposed for what it is.

 

Well, if you are an American Taxpaying Citizen like me (I pay way too much in taxes) then your tax dollars are being used to fund Zionism and its Expansion. So, "doing to me" would have its connection on that level alone though there are many more levels to contemplate, no doubt.

 

is the only response this deserves.

 

Just for the record, your personal share of aid to Israel is whopping $9/year. That is if you pay taxes in the first place, which I doubt very much, your mom I am sure does.

You personal share of taxes allocated to fighting Islamic (including Palestinian and pro-Palestinian) terrorism that people like you support and help fuel is an order of magnitude higher but you don't seem to be concerned with that.

 

Look at this image of Bill Clinton wearing a Hebrew pin during the DNC and weep. The Clintons are working for the Elders too

Oh, he put it on in protest to some Islamofascist Hamas loving idiots who burned an Israeli flag during the convention. You're probably friends with them

 

Don't forget, Primus, Russia is friends with Iran! They can't attack Iran just like that. If Russia just stood by and did nothing, then they might as well pack it in for good and accept their fate. It is my feeling Russia will risk all if Iran gets attacked. China will also jump in and help Iran. That could bring us the Third WW.
It is hard to believe the US/Zionists would risk that, unless they have something magical up their sleeve we don't know of.

For the sake of the animals I hope we will avoid a nuclear war!

Here is an excerpt from The Pravda Report of 2012:

No, no...Hitler and the Nazis have been proclaimed as the "greatest evil in the world!"

 

What does this have to do with the fact that there was no war on terror in 2000?
The Weather Underground is an insignificant group... You babbling on about them is weird.

 

​

Not much truth in your post, but this (above) certainly is. And why would not you want to help Israel to fight a war on terror? What are you, a Liberal or something?

 

Thanks for a very thoughtful Post.

However, the US is already aiding Israel's Oded Yinon Plan for Zionist Regional Hegemony by supporting ISIS / ISIL / Daesh. The American version of Israel's Oded Yinon Plan was spelled out in JINSA's Policy Paper composed by traitorous Ziono-American War Mongers Wolfwitz, Perle, Feith etc for Netanyahu.

I'm sure you've heard of it: "A Clean Break; A New Strategy for Securing the Realm". Not surprisingly, both Plans call for essentially the same thing:

- The Balkanization of the Islamic World using proxy "Muslim Terrorist Groups" which are comprised of disaffected individuals of all faiths around the World.

The following excerpt further clarifies the means & characteristics of both the Zionist-Israeli & Ziono-American Plans which are already underway:





“Israel’s Future Vision of the Middle East”
http://m.strategic-culture.org/news/2015/03/28/israel-future-vision-of-the-middle-east.html

EXCERPT “Beginning in 1982 with the «Yinon Plan», a proposed Israeli future for a Middle East based on a series of failed Arab states divided into warring smaller fiefdoms, and maturing in the 1990s with Binyamin Netanyahu’s commissioned policy paper called «A Clean Break», which foresaw scrapping the entire peace process with the Palestinians,

Netanyahu enters his fourth term as prime minister in command of an Israel that has scrapped a Palestinian state and which has provided assistance to the Salafist/Saudi axis in support of the Islamic State, Al Qaeda, and other radical jihadist groups.

Today, as a result of Israeli right-wing/Saudi/Gulf Wahhabist collusion, Iraq, Syria, Libya, and Yemen are failed states and the Middle East is becoming increasingly «balkanized».

In December 2014, a Shin Bet intelligence report revealed that during the first few months of 2015 the disintegration of Iraq, Syria, Yemen, and Libya into warring factions would accelerate.

That prediction has materialized. The Israeli report also saw Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey becoming more autocratic states.

That, also, has come about, especially in Saudi Arabia where the new king, Salman, has started to reverse some of the minor reforms instituted by his late predecessor, Abdullah."CONTINUED



I don't think that the Pentagon or the American people have the stomach, today, to fight another War for Israel's Zionist Expansionists like the last one:

“QUIETLY LOBBYING CONGRESS TO APPROVE THE USE OF FORCE IN IRAQ WAS ONE OF AIPAC’S SUCCESSES OVER THE PAST YEAR.” AIPAC Executive Director Howard Kohr; N.Y. SUN JAN. ’03


Instead, I envision more of the same American funded & Zionist run Balkanization efforts throughout the Region with Zionist Regional Hegemony as the end goal & supported by Israel's threatening "Sampson Option" [1]

What are your thoughts



[1] “ISRAELI NUCLEAR THREATS AND BLACKMAIL”
“The Samson Option Still Threatens the World”
http://www.carolmoore.net/nuclearwar/israelithreats.html

EXCERPT “Originally a strategy of last resort retaliation - even if it means Israel’s annihilation - it has developed into being a nuclear bullying strategy to further Israel’s territorial goals through threats and blackmail.

Israel has bullied not only Arab and Muslim nations, but the United States and Russia with its Samson Option threats.(*)

Mordechai Vanunu has alleged that Israel uses for purposes of blackmail its ability to "bombard any city all over the world, and not only those in Europe but also those in the United States."[8]

In 1977, after a right-wing coalition under Menachen Begin took power, the Israelis began to use the Samson Option not just to deter attack but to allow Israel to “redraw the political map of the Middle East” by expanding hundreds of thousands of Israeli settlers into the West Bank and Gaza.[18]

Then-Minister of Defense Ariel Sharon said things like "We are much more important than (Americans) think. We can take the middle east with us whenever we go"[19] and "Arabs may have the oil, but we have the matches."[20](*)

He proclaimed his - and many Likud Party members' - goals of transforming Jordan into a Palestinian state and “transferring” all Palestinian refugees there.[21][22] (*)A practice known worldwide as "ethnic cleansing."CONTINUED

 

Netanyahu believes that he won't get an additional $50 billion from Trump.. haven't you been following the news?

If you don't remember anything I have ever written on this board, remember that the oil business hates a war zone.. Iraqi oil has yet to recover and Libyan production is down to 200,000 bpd on good days.