Homeless George Zimmerman Can No Longer Stand His Ground >>MOD WARNING<<

Liberals never actually cared for Hispanics or Black people. If they did care, the liberal policies of Chicago and Detroit would have resulted in beautiful "inner city" areas with abundance of funding and safety.

 

I watched the trial in its entirety. He was not guilty as hell. He was getting pummeled and did what the law allowed him to do to prevent his own permanent injury or death. He shot the dumb bastard who attacked him. OJ? Are you freaking serious?

Know what OJ said to the cops when they finally got him into custody? "What are all these **ggers doing in Brentwood?"

Excuse me. I misread your post.

 

Libs appear to be happy to hound someone almost literally to death. If Zimmerman is as guilty as you say even though the court says otherwise then I am sure you find Hillary as guilty of wrongdoing, right?

 

Stand your ground has nothing to do with owning a home, so Zimmerman can still stand his ground.

In FL, the Castle Doctrine (which is what I really think you're talking about), applies to your car if you are living in it.

 

Yeah, the guys life was destroyed because he defended himself while under attack.

Modern day media and SJW's at their best.

 

You got it! Didn't miss a thing.

Not to mention the OP apparently doesn't realize "stand your ground" is to defend your life. It must suck to not know that.

 

a trump supporter I am sure



- - - Updated - - -

no, his life was destroyed cause he stalked and killed a unarmed teen

- - - Updated - - -

the difference is, the left believed both OJ and Zimmerman got away with it......

 

Sources for this claim. The court said that he was attacked and acted in self defense.

There was never even a charge for stalking, LOL!

 

that is 100% fact, he stalked and killed Martin, he followed Martin in his vehicle then on foot and then he killed him, what part do you dispute?

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/stalked

I think he was overcharged, he should of been charged with manslaughter.....

.

 

Martin thought he was a GAY stalker, so he ambushed Zimmerman. Don't forget that part.

 

Stalking is a minor charge. I asked you why he wasn't charged with it?

Also, if he were convicted of stalking and murder, you would be correct. However, the facts showed he acted in self defense, so your claims are nothing. The court system disagrees with you. They could have easily tacked on stalking. Why didn't they?

 

In the audio of the struggle, a male is screaming for help. Who is it?

 

yes, both parties made bad assumptions of the other, one paid for it with his life, one is still paying for it as a social outcast


.

 

Most stalkers do call the police to inform them they're stalking someone, especially white Hispanic gay stalkers.

 

the man that pulled the gun on Martin and killed him I assume, but we do not know for sure

- - - Updated - - -

not sure what your saying, at least your agreeing with me that z was stalking m that night

.

 

Taking liberty to edit your sentence:

yes, both parties made bad assumptions of the other, one paid for it with his life, and the other may have paid for it with his life, were he not armed.

 

simple, cause he was not guilty of stalking in the legal sense, but in a dictionary sense he was stalking him

 

You can't say he was stalking about her was never charged, nor convicted of it. Right now, you're just using a false opinion.

 

He thought he was being stalked by a gay man; or at least that's what the witness said.

If you haven't listened to the audio, just say so. Don't pretend you don't know it is in fact George Zimmerman's voice. No, it can't be proven one way or another, but is that an excuse to play dumb? He was getting pummeled. There's no doubt about it. Argue anything else about the case, but don't argue that fact, because you're not stupid.

If his screams for help and wounds on his head aren't proof enough he was being attacked, there's no evidence that would convince you. For political or ideological reasons, whatever, you'll never admit you're wrong about this case. Oh well.

 

A predominantly white jury judging against a black guy, like in the best of days in the 1960's / the US apartheid era.... with the lame excuse of we have to take his word for it, cause the black guy he killed can't dispute it. And the idea that a black guy, living 3 minutes (protecting his ground) from where he got murdered by a maniac who left his car in a dark rainy night with a gun, fought for his life and got shot for almost winning his life.... yeah. For further reference about standing your ground and race I'll be referring to a south park episode.

On topic... I guess it's karma that he's jobless, homeless etc.
His tweet about him being a 1 man army, with the picture of that child he executed,
really shows he feels no guilt at all for stalking and executing a child for being suspicious because he was black.

 

The race card. Can't say we didn't see that coming.

 

As if race doesn't play a roll in the US.
lol

 

We know. We know. The jury took Zman's side because he's a Hispanic who was a Democrat.

Must be all about race.

YOU GET A RACE CARD, YOU GET A RACE CARD, EVERYONE GETS A RACE CARD!!!!

 

You skip the part where Martin slipped away, came back and started beating the (*)(*)(*)(*) out of Zimmerman, to the point that Zimmerman was afraid for his life.

 

You dispute that race plays a roll in the US?


OMG
lol

- - - Updated - - -

You skipped the part that Zimmerman left his car, during a dark rainy night, and while he was armed, confronted a child.