Trump comes out ahead in Willmar High School mock election

Not surprising to me. I've said all along you just wait and see how many young people vote for Trump. It will confuse and befuddle the liberals to death.

http://www.wctrib.com/news/local/4144816-trump-comes-out-ahead-willmar-high-school-mock-election

 

Wow! A school in a highly conservative rural town of less than 20,000 in the Midwest holds a mock election and the Republican wins?!?

Who would have ever guessed?

 

This highly conservative county voted almost 46% for Obama last election.

 

So did the state of Texas. Yet I doubt anyone would see Texas as being anything other than highly conservative.

 

Saw a thing on FB where Trump won a local middle school with 2/3s of the vote. People were shocked. I was like---"yeah that is the school where all the farm kids go. What are the results at the black majority middle schools?"

 

I know this is very moot, kind of like MSM polls that make sure and over sample democrat voters.

 

Ok. Here's the important question:

Do you have any idea what "over-sampling" means in the context of scientific polling?

 

Making sure you get the result you want.

 

It's amusing that cons are resorting to high school mock elections for any signs of good news. Enjoy your sinking ship.

 

Thank you for demonstrating your ignorance. I can now safely ignore any of your posts on this topic.

 

Lol no, that is a cop out all day by you. Now go lie some more to your voting block.

 

You are aware Conservative pollsters use over-sampling too if they want their polls to be accurate, yes?

 

Which is why I do not trust the polls. But of course im sure you love the ones you agree with.

Call me ignorant, yet you do everything to cover up for the most exposed and corrupt candidate in history with Hillary. I call that pathetic.

 

Yes it will. Our Youth are Our Future.

Clinton Foundation’s Fundraisers Pressed Donors to Steer Business to Former President.

Two chief fundraisers for the Clinton Foundation pressed corporate donors to steer business opportunities to former President Bill Clinton as well, according to a hacked memo published Wednesday by WikiLeaks.

The November 2011 memo from Douglas Band, at the time a top aide to Mr. Clinton, outlines extensive fundraising efforts that Mr. Band and a partner deployed on behalf of the Clinton Foundation and how that work sometimes translated into large speaking fees and other paid work for Mr. Clinton.

The memo, part of a cache of emails stolen from Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton’s campaign manager, resurfaces an issue that she has had a hard time shaking: questions over the relationship between the Clintons’ charity work and their personal business.

The Clintons don’t produce any desirable consumer products, or perform any traditionally useful services like accounting or dry cleaning. They have built no factories, dug no mines, nor worked any farms. They hold no patents and have developed no real estate. They are not medical doctors of rare skill. They haven’t starred in any hit movies or sung any popular songs. They have (allegedly) written and sold some books, but not the kind of bestsellers that get turned into TV shows and make real money.

And yet they have grown rich “beyond the dreams of avarice” since Bill left office nearly 16 years ago, and even richer since Hillary entered international politics just eight years ago.

How?

By peddling influence — an activity which generates great wealth only in a corrupt and overly bureaucratic society.

That’s the swamp that needs to be drained, and it runs much deeper and wider than most anyone realizes.

https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/247465/

 

Which they also did in 2012 and actually underestimated Obamas support. Your compliant would have merit if it actually resulted in incorrect polls.

 

How about a poll where Clinton is only 12 points ahead, yet only 27% of the people polled were Republican... UH OH

 

Not this time, Hillary does not have near the same backing as Obama. Obama used to rake in the crowds, not so much for Hillary and the dirtiest presidential run that we know of.

And I like how you try and justify lies to push your agenda. Typical democrat.

 

Unless there is a huge undercurrent, that nobody has seen any evidence of, Trump is going to get beaten badly.

 

Exactly... Couldn't question polls during the obama campaign because he was pulling in thousands. Clinton pulls in tens, sometimes hundreds.

 

The Clinton ground game, that the media is not talking about, has spent the past 8 months registering and contacting voters who lean her way. Trump has held rallies.

The ground game combined with the media spin will win, it always has....

 

Yah we heard the same thing in 2012 about how the luster of Obama had worn off and Romney had bigger crowds.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...an-in-ohio-obama-draws-crowds-less-than-4000/

 

Trump should have virtually no chance with young voters anywhere if the indoctrination was done correctly. Maybe there is hope for this country after all...

 

Blacks vote 95% Democrat every election, despite falling further and further behind everyone else.

You can bet they'll do so again this time around.

 

You obviously ignored the fact that Trump lied the other day and said he did not believe the polls anymore. Then yesterday when one poll in FL sats he is 2 or 3 points ahead he takes about it as if he just heard it directly from the Oriclev of Delphi.

 

I think there's a huge undercurrent, that the media doesn't speak of, that supports Trump. JMHO

There's only one way to find out. But for certain, any evidence of it will not be spoken about by the media, and if Hillary had a strong ground game going on, the media would talk about it.