Do Non-White Minorities Respect Progressive White SJWs?

Nice people are respected. That includes people who are against racism. Jerks are not. That's my black perspective. It doesn't support your theory.

 

The problem is, SJWs are not nice people. They're fanatical ideologues, obsessed with installing their dogma as rule of law. Nice people don't beat up homeless women for supporting a different political candidate. Nice people don't demand you use a 'preferred pronoun' by shouting it at you on Youtube. Nice people don't encourage separatist mechanisms for people they understand nothing about. Nice people don't act as though you need their especial help ... even when you don't. Nice people listen respectfully to the other side. Etc.

- - - Updated - - -

Yet SJWs behave as though they're all exactly the same. And all in desperate need of help from obese green-haired lesbians.

 

I think of SJW' s as activists. Are you
labeling violent people who may or may not have a political agenda SJW's? Do you think of people like Marian Wright Edelman or Dorothy Heights as SJW's?

I don't agree with your definition of SJW. Most of them don't do the things that you mentioned.

 

The top photo is of Evangelical or Pentecostal folks praying for someone,
how is that relevant ?

Possibly the bottom one are apologists for Slavery and Apartheid, so I fail to really see a plausible connection.

OK,
I looked up the definition of
SJW,

Social justice warrior.

Well SJW originally referred to the crazy tumbler types who would say things like "White people wearing dreadlocks is cultural appropriation", or "I was mentally raped by a man yesterday because he looked at me in the subway".Aug 20, 2014"

Oh, more Liberal Left hogwash.

 

What is SJW ?

I admit total ignorance of it's definition, I will have to look it up online.

 

Wow, depending on the weather or the stars or other factors, you sure change how you opine on topics, why is that ?

On another post you mentioned one or two Lesbian friends and your support, now they are obese and green haired,
when did this happen ?

 

Social Justice Warrior. That's what SJW stands for.

 

Are the descendants of the great black overseers and bandit kings in Africa on their knees apologizing for selling their kin and kine to white slave ship owners?

If not then people need to stop with this ridiculous nonsense.

The "Nazi ghost" quote from Varg is a pretty good one here.

I for one am (*)(*)(*)(*)ing sick and tired of it. I am not sorry some ancestors that may or may not have been mine may or may not have had something to do with buying slaves from someone who may or may not have been your ancestor that sold them in the first place.


(*)(*)(*)(*) off with that garbage. It's so ridiculously sad and SJW's have no legs to stand on.

 

Only whites are expected to carry the guilt of slavery, which is an institution that every race of people on Earth participated in. Slavery still exists in areas of Africa and the Middle East, but you won't find too many SJW's complaining about it. They only focus on whites participating in slavery. They never mention that slavery was rejected in white countries, or that the most deadly US war was a civil one, largely to end slavery. They also never mention that only a small double-digit percentage of whites held slaves in the US, and that the overwhelming majority of whites in this country (well over 90%) never had a relative who owned slaves.

They don't really care about slavery too much. They're more interested in shaming the country's population so that they lose pride in the country, its founding, its founders, its history, its culture, which will make people more willing to abandon those things and go along with what the SJWs want.

 

It's insanity, really. Researching he subject has been pretty funny. Most people barely mention the blacks that sold other blacks at all, and even then it's just a footnote. In fact, from school, I don't think the whole "how did the slaves get on the ship" was ever answered at all.

It's the biggest cop out in history.

It's sort of like calling the jewish holocaust "The Holocaust". It's exceptionalism and it's absurd. Whites are not responsible for the horrible actions of people 200 years ago and SJW'S, BLM Sharpton and crew need to get on with life. It's preposterous.

 

In their narrative, blacks were living in peace, harmony, and prosperity until the big bad white Europeans rowed ashore and started plucking people out of the bush. They were never enslaved by their fellow blacks, because only whites are capable of that kind of evil.

And yes, "THE holocaust" implies that it was the only holocaust in history, or the only one significant enough to mention. "THE holocaust" is the result of Jews being overrepresented in media, Hollywood, and Academia, which is the dominant axis of indoctrination that children go through as they grow up. They control these things, they control the narrative in society.

 

Because white people still share the very same genetic code that- as some argue- induced their great, great, great grandparents to commit those sins. It's a lot like how people blame Islam for Muslim atrocities- both past and present. It's just that in the white man's case, his skin color is what ultimately defines his identity.

 

Did everyone else's genes change or something? No, the fact only whites, particularly white males, are targeted for the sins of their ancestors. Well, actually, maybe it WAS a problem. Whites in this country sent a message on Nov. 8th, hope the media got the message, or they will find more and more backlash on the way...

 

That's the point. Non-whites, along with many whites, percieve Western culture as synonymous with skin tone. That isn't the case with other civilizations that are predominialty defined by religion, nationhood, and so on.

 

Romney in 2012: 59% of the white vote.
Trump in 2016 - 58% of the white vote.

Interesting that despite more whites voting for Romney, they failed to send that same "message' in 2012, eh?

 

Could it be because it is not just the sins of the great, great, great, grandparents. Many of the sins are of the parents.

 

There is more sin in regards to race relations perceived than actually committed present day, or any time in the recent past. Its also worth mentioning that most of the current racism, is not coming from white people these days.

You also dodged a significant portion of his question. Surprise surprise.