No criminality in Clinton emails - FBI

Do you know something we don't know? Election is tomorrow.

 

Where does protecting the homeland rank in the priority list?
Under Hillary "Pale Rider" Clinton, Doomsday is just a spit away for your kids and grandkids..






You won't be able to protect your kids and grandkids when the nukes start going off, so protect them NOW by putting Don in the WH to undo the mess left by Obama/Hillary..

"DAD!"

 

FBI agents pressed Justice unsuccessfully for probe of Clinton Foundation


And once again, desperate Trumpanzees latch on to Breitbart blogs to avoid objective reality...

Now, a little enlightenment for those who need to improve their basic reading comprehension skills. There are members of the FBI who took a political hit piece by the senior editor of Breitbart as gospel and decided to push for an investigation. The Justice Department's attorneys (career, not political appointees) looked at their "evidence" and laughed them out of the room for being idiotic conspiracy theorists. There is no official FBI investigation of the Clinton Foundation, and the FBI has been ordered to drop the matter - which they were never authorized to investigate to begin with. Sucks to be a Trumpanzee today, but it is what it is...

 

As someone who had the displeasure of visiting Bosnia in 1997 for almost an entire year, and seeing what the people who inhabit that place did to their own country, you really have no room to talk about leadership.

 

We're already paying the price for this. We can already see the corrosive effects of Madame Clinton and the Obama Administration's wanton disregard for the rule of law. Not only has it undermined the rule of law by permitting and encouraging criminal behavior on the part of government officials, it has destroyed the public trust in our justice system and law enforcement agencies.

As for Clinton's carelessness, not only does she not give a damn about our national security, she doesn't give a damn about the lives of American military and diplomatic personnel. That's why she could vote to send American servicemen and women off to fight and die in a war she wasn't committed to winning and later send American diplomatic personnel to their deaths in an anarchic war zone that she helped create without adequately ensuring their safety.

The only thing Hillary Clinton cares about is Hillary Clinton.

 

Not impressed. I had direct ancestors who fought and died in the Texas Revolution.

 

I had direct ancestors who fought and died in the Battle of Hastings 1066..

 

Which means as much to Texans as the Battle of San Jacinto means to the average Brit...

 

No criminality that a phony like James Comey would pursue anyway. Clinton crimes are not to be prosecuted. She is above the law.

 

All we dumb Brits know is that Donald "Travis" Trump wants to keep the bad hombres out; sounds good to me..

 

LOL at the caps ! I presume that you realise that people who are not charged do not make the news hence you would not hear that they have "mishandled classified info, put it on a less secure server, or a personal computer they took home" ?

 

Yes you will need to take a course on reading comprehension. Then get with that CNN Legal Analyst and have him explain to you very slowly what is actually taking place......and why.



Other reporters at Fox have reporting that backs up Baier's reporting on the Clinton Foundation investigation. (I have one source who says the same thing). And Baier is hardly alone in reporting that the FBI is investigating the Clinton Foundation. Richard Pollock of The Daily Caller has been reporting the same since the summer. And CNN Senior Law Enforcement Analyst Tom Fuentes, a former top FBI official, cited conversations with "several" senior FBI officials when reported three times last weekend that the FBI investigation of the Clinton Foundation was "ongoing."

"The FBI has an intensive investigation ongoing into the Clinton Foundation," Fuentes said. "The FBI made the determination that the investigation would go forward as a comprehensive unified case and be coordinated. So that investigation is ongoing and Huma Abedin and her role in the foundation and possible allegations concerning the activities of the Secretary of State in the nature of the Foundation and possible pay-to-play, that's still being looked at."

When anchor Poppy Harlow asked Fuentes whether what he was relating were "facts you know from the FBI," Fuentes responded: "Yes, I do. Senior officials at the FBI, several of them."

A Wall Street Journal article published Wednesday provided details of the dispute between the FBI and the Department of Justice over the Clinton Foundation. The article notes that the investigation into the Clinton Foundation began in the summer of 2015 and reports that FBI officials on the investigation believed they had collected enough evidence to intensify their probe. Officials at the Justice Department disagreed and the dispute continued as the presidential nominating contests got underway. As FBI agents pushed to do more, Justice Department officials discouraged their efforts. On August 12, according the WSJ, a senior Justice Deparment official called FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe to complain that FBI agents were "disregarding or disobeying" instructions from DOJ. "The conversation was a tense one, they said, and at one point Mr. McCabe asked, 'Are you telling me that I need to shut down a validly predicated investigation?' The senior Justice Department official replied: 'Of course not.'"

Tom Fuentes is one of them. He tells THE WEEKLY STANDARD that he stands by his comments last week. Fuentes says the FBI's Clinton Foundation probe is "ongoing" and looking at Foundation activities in light of "the recent Wikileaks and Judicial Watch FOIA revelations, which require additional investigation.".....snip~

http://www.weeklystandard.com/clinto...rticle/2005261

Truly it must suck....to not be able to comprehend a reality validated by McCabe the Deputy Director of the FBI.

 

Considering most of the 'Brits' prefer Clinton to win rather than Trump, you are clearly making things up.

 

They didn't. They only reviewed emails to or from Hillary, WHILE she was secretary of State.

 

The part he didn't tell you was that he's shipping them all to Wales...

 

You wouldn't even bee there 1997 if your American Ambassador Warren Zimmerman didn't persuay the Muslim leaders to not sign the peace in 1992. Your country us nice for it's own citizens, but the less you know about us the better for everyone.

"Within days of meeting Zimmermann, Izetbegović withdrew his signature and renounced the peace plan he agreed to in Lisbon, suddenly declaring his opposition to any type of ethnic division of Bosnia. "

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_Zimmermann

As you might know, we are not used to bend over to others like our European neighbours.

 

Do you have a link to support your theory that there are Americans in jail for what Hillary Clinton did?

Hillary Clinton violated the Federal Records Act, a civil, not criminal offense. Americans do not go to jail for civil offenses. They pay fines.

Comey was quite plain when he said that there was no evidence of intent, required to be charged with the Espionage Act, despite chronicling exhaustive investigations by the FBI. No one has been charged with the Espionage Act without intent being present since the Gorin decision by the Supreme Court. No one has ever been found guilty of violating the Espionage Act using gross negligence either. One FBI agent was charged with gross negligence, but chose to make a plea bargain of lying to federal agents instead.

http://warontherocks.com/2016/07/why-intent-not-gross-negligence-is-the-standard-in-clinton-case/

It is a cornerstone of the American justice system that innocence is assumed and guilt must be proved, beyond a reasonable doubt and with a preponderance of evidence. Comey testified to Congress that there was not evidence of a crime, while there was evidence of a civil violation.

If you can cite cases where Americans are in jail for violation of the Espionage Act, without intent, please link them. All I see are multiple citations that no American has even been charged with it since the Gorin decision, and that no one has ever been tried using the Espionage Act due to gross negligence.

 

Believe me, no one wanted to be there in 1997. I saw enough of that place to last a lifetime. Again, after seeing the 3rd world mess that was Bosnia is enough for me to safely ignore any input you might have on leadership and governance. You have no standing to criticize anyone when your country cannot even effectively govern itself.

 

You are a laughing stock for the world sir. A country which is one of the richest in the world, with all that money and you get two idiots to choose from, one clown and one criminal. I think it's fair to say that it is an accomplishment for such a "1st world" country.

Remember that our "3rd world citizen" lit up your America back in the days. What you saw 1997 is your partly your countries creation. Something that has been done several times before and after. Lets hope you or your kids wont need to experience it.

 

Gerald Ford

duh

- - - Updated - - -

Nixon, the crook, was given a full pardon.
Remember?

 

LOL did I hurt your little feelings. Truth hurts don't it. Yea let me send you a link to my tv. What a dumb (*)(*)(*)(*) you are.

 

Id be happy if Hillary did that.

How about the sailor who all he did was take a selfie and is now spending a year in jail.

 

If you mean Kristian Saucier, he plead guilty. He photographed the entire propulsion system of a nuclear submarine, showed the photos to his ex-wife and others, and they all said he knew he wasn't supposed to take those photos.

By contrast, two of his shipmates took "selfies" and got fined $560 and a one grade reduction in rank.

 

Oh, you really think you have something there don't you?

How does voting on legislation prevent Bush from being the biggest gangster / butcher t U.S. presidency has ever known. Lol the Republicans at the time could have cared less about the monstrous acts the Bush Jr administration committed. Remember the Senate based its vote on the trash evidence that Bush gave to it. It sounds like you need to read up on U.S. history by the sound of your post. Lol by the way the legislation she signed was not a direct vote for immediate invasion. Not only do I have to defend my post but I have to teach you U.S. history. The legislation said invasion only after all other options (including diplomacy) were exhausted. Bush took that to mean immediate invasion after the legislation passed. Duh! get an education.

 

Yea that's even worse. Hillary was supposed to do her homework, she did, she agreed with Bush and no amount of you whining is going to change history. Would you like the video of the vote?