Gun-Totin' Left-Wingers Demonstrate at the Arizona Capitol: Is Bloodshed on the Horizon?

Disagree with his politics? The man aimed a loaded weapon at a police officer.

 

Why do you keep admitting to breaking California law and then having to go back and find an excuse?

The Gen 4 Glocks are not on the California approved handgun list, so how did you get one?

 

You can look at that weapon and tell it is loaded? You're better than me. He was just using his scope to be able to see what was going on, but that's not the official liberal MSM narrative about that picture, is it? That weapon MUST be loaded, and he MUST be "aiming" it at a police officer, in order to be politically useful to you, doesn't it?

When *I* use my rifle optics to see things I don't want to shoot, I make my weapon safe first (no chambered round). The very last thing that guy wanted to do was to shoot someone, and I believe anyone would take necessary precautions to be sure that didn't accidentally happen. I imagine these "idiotic rednecks" might not be so judicious, huh? He's probably a racist homophobe nazi too, huh?

No need to dredge up this crap; the point is, YOU made a judgement about 'the kind of person' that guy was, without knowing anything about him. Then disparaged me for having done the same thing. Hypocrisy. Never mind that, in my case, it was a sarcastic joke (calling a man a lesbian) that you leapt upon like a rabid SJW racoon without even knowing to whom I was referring.

 

I bet this guy thinks he's behind cover.

 

What's wrong with good ol' American firearms?

Colt, S&W, Springfield, etc...etc...etc...

 

I own 3 HP. one is hidden outside and does get exposed to Colorado weather, one is in a BOB and the other is at my property. All are the 45 JHP. I wanted an inexpensive reliable hand gun that if damaged or stolen would make it no big deal. I purchased some 8 years ago and 2 of them never been cleaned and have put many rounds through them. Yes, they are a basic handgun and serve a purpose others do not. I am happy with my return on them.

 

Dang them Libby's could have used you on the front line!

 

I have that same .22! Believe this man, break it down and sand off that finish and recoat it with clear! The natural wood sock is amazing color!

 

I think what put the Libby in perspective was the point that a license plate is private property, but for a few buck online the information they contain is hardly private and that's the very reason they all ran away

 

Seriously? I realize there are places in Colorado that don't get snow, but hell, I don't think I believe you could leave a slide action semi auto out in the elements, never cleaned or oiled and actual work after a year! Sorry man I aint buying it I have a Colt 45 ACP Government model 1911 and mine is on the headboard, even with that it must be broken "yearly" down cleaned and fresh lubricant applied to the slide surfaces or it wants to smokestack, and that with max pressures from reloading.

 

After years of using oil as a lubricant, I have switched to lithium grease. Small amounts, applied strategically stay put longer, and attract less powder fouling.

 

Doesn't Hamas wear similar face coverings? Why would honest citizens feel the need to cover their faces in some of the photos? I don't recall conservatives needing to do so...

 

It was neither purchased in California, nor does it reside here.

 

And destroy the patina developed over 56 years?

I get where you are coming from. I just couldn't do that to this rifle.

 

So it's okay 4 the right wingers to show up armed, but nobody else better not.

 

Not sure you'll find anyone that said this, except in terms of the people in question brandishing their weapons rather than carrying them, and the irony in the color of the shirts they chose to wear.

 

This must be why democrats are such fans of jim crow era gun laws that are intended to keep minorities unarmed.

 

You mean conservative democrats from that Era. Most of them are Republicans now.

 

Magical thinking. So explain why new gun laws have been passed by democrats for years, and its constantly still pushed by dems.

Shouldn't California and New York have the least anti-black gun laws by now? How many decades of unopposed democrat leadership need to go by before we see a change?

 

I've seen no evidence that Democrats are specifically seeking to limit minority access to firearms.

The fact is that there is a certain faction who would seek to bar all Americans from gun ownership.

Part of the reason that this has been unsuccessful, in large part, goes to my post above. It is my firm belief that firearm ownership within the Democratic party is vastly under reported.

 

And yet, the areas with the strongest gun control laws are also strongly Democrat.

 

No one can deny that. I certainly can't.

 

More like nonsensical, completely ineffective laws.

 

the right wing second amendment base is the majority and has more man power to organize for use of force to defend against tyranny, the left wing second amendment people are a very small minority and should not live by the sword.

 

my 40 cal Springfield is made in Croatia