Probably not when it comes to trump. Think about his own words, his own statements, his behavior, his actions. I could never support such a person. Never.
How old are you so we know now long your lifetime is. On a scale of 0 to 10, where zero is hopeless and ten is fabulous, I would give Trump a positive 19. I'd make it a 20 but he is should have fired at least 5,000 Democrat appointees and bureaucrats by now.
The statement that I said is unverifiable was Trump was Hitler. What statement where you referencing in your first reply? Because you said it is verifiable.
...and obviously the one you take is called kissasstrumpanol. Side affect: makes you feel like a Trump zombie.
Touché - I stand corrected. Political correctness is certainly a Democrats cherished prerogative. All yours
Everyone demands $$$ for their demographic group. Take, take, take. That's America in the 21st century. Sad.
We should not have to sacrifice the entire US Constitutions just to guarantee abortion on demand. If Adolf had survived WW2 Germany (which he did not) and moved to Australia and ran for president in Australia and promised all the babes there abortion on demand, would you have voted for him ?? That's what Hillary was promising all the babes here in the USA -- abortion on demand despite the rest of the US Constitution. Think about it. When the founding Freemasons wrote the Constitution they were not thinking about women, or fetuses, or abortions. Ergo that issue belonged to each of the several 13 states at the time -- 50 states now.
DJ Trump is a grown-old frat boy. He never completely grew a brain. Still he is better than Hillary with her devious and dishonest lying brain.
Abortion is illegal here in qld and even a "liberal" governmentcannot seem to do anything about it. Bottom line is that the laws really mean nothing anyway for the same reason your laws were overturned. It is the "health and welfare" clause. To save those women who will die without it it has to be there. Once it is inserted into legislation then it almost becomes abortion on demand because who can assess acceptable risk to life and health but the woman herself? And that discussion is between her and her doctor which is priveledged information Our rates of surgical abortion rival those states where it is not illegal
Everything you say may be a truism, but that has nothing to do with the US Constitution. The US Constitution is silent on the matter. This simply means it is a state issue.
It was a foolish interpretation of the Constitution. The justices simply made up new law for political reasons.
What is the alternative? Have you really thought through the implications of RvW? It does not just apply to abortions