pedophiles going public

No

 

Well, he should use a condom.

 

I can't believe this is still being argued. The arguments for gays are NOT the same as pedophilia. Science has shown in numerous studies that children are physically, mentally and emotionally harmed by molestation while there is no evidence that engaging in homosexual acts harm an adult in any way.

 

Could you hug random adults?

 

The age of consent is a legal concept, anything else is irrelevant, you could give me consent to kill you by cutting your penis off and choking you with it. You could even put that consent in writing, you could beg me to do it, I might want to do it, but it would be irrelevant. You cannot give me consent to murder you, a child cannot give me consent to do ANYTHING.

 

no, it is assault, try hugging me.

 

They're close enough in this instance. Normally "should be having" implies that someone is doing something, but it can also imply that they might be doing that in the future. "Should be able to have" implies whether or not someone should have access to or have the right to do something.

In this case however...it's roughly the same thing. One argues whether or not someone should or should not be doing something...the other argues whether or not someone has the right to be able to do something.

 

No, they just found correlation with harm. Just like they found homosexual acts correlates with depression, substance abuse, and suicide.

 

Land Cover, may I ask what country you reside in? Not that I want your address or anything. But it might be helpful in justifying President Trump's travel ban.

 

I could but I'd be facing the consequences of those actions. If I hugged a homophobic man he might punch me because he feels that I'm acting gay (and worse still, acting gay with him). If I hugged a random woman, she might slap/punch/kick/pepper=spray me for doing it, get a male partner/friend to punch me, or call the police and have me arrested for sexual assault.

Basically I'd be looking at being shoved forcibly away at best, spending the rest of my life on the Sex Offender's Registry at worst.

So hugs aren't that innocent after all eh?

 

Liberal judges make new law all the time by decreeing new rights under the constitution

They are autocrsts in every sense of the word

 

We arguing change of concepts here, that is why it's completely relevant.

 

I mean children... they don't need or be obliged to do something, they need only the right to do this if they want. And if they don't want, they don't have to do this. That is what I'm arguing for. Child should have sex if he wants to and if his partner wants it too.

 

People are harmed by overeating but they have a right to do so if the unelected dictators on the supreme court say they can

Sensible people may all agree that children under a certain age should not have sex with aduts

But if 5 liberal judges say children have a constitutional right that becomes the last word on the subject

And we have homosexuals to thank for that unhappy fact

 

No we are not, you are not talking about consent, you are talking about what children may or may not like. A child cannot legally consent to anything, do you accept that?

 

You are talking about the wackadoodle who can't even write intelligible sentences in English?

 

Psychology isn't a political science.

 

I hate Islam. It's enough?

 

No because children cannot give consent to anything, arguing what they like, what is the difference between a hug and a ****, whether it harms them or anything else is irrelevant. Children cannot give consent to anything, full stop.

 

The challenge was to "prove" with scientific certainty that most Americans do not support gay marriage

 

You are making the arguement that 5 sexual perverts on a liberal dominated supreme court would agree with to decriminalize pedophilia

 

That's it, you need to be close enough to a person to be able to hug him, and it doesn't matter is he an adult or a child. That is why comparison between sex and hug is completely legit.

 

There is doubt in my mind all pedophiles convicted on hard evidence should be executed ASAP.

There is doubt about their crimes if they are caught in the act by video evidence, or multiple witnesses or the pedophile's DNA inside any of the childs orifices.

String 'em up!

 

I accept we have to change laws.

 

Change the laws to make it legal to rape a child?