BZZZT Wrong! The right of adults to marry the consenting adult of their choice has always existed and the SCOTUS did not "invent" it. There was a time in our history when bigots refused to allow consenting adults of different races to marry. Did the SCOTUS "invent" the "constitutional right" for interracial marriage? Yes or no?
That is an absurd false equivalence! Under your illogical idiotic scenario a 5 year old should be allowed to drive on a highway. Why don't we allow 5 year olds to drive at all, let alone on highways? Because 5 year olds have no understanding of the consequences if they make a mistake! That mistake can have life altering consequences not only for themselves but for others too. Can hugging a 5 year old have life altering consequences? Yes or no? Can sexual intercourse with a 5 year old have life altering consequences? Yes or no? What are your answers?
Your utterly fallacious allegation has zero basis and I challenge you to provide credible substantiation for it. No, I won't be holding my breath waiting for your response because we both know you can't provide one.
When a pedophiles coerces a minor child into sex does the child understand what is happening? Yes or no?
You don't get to redefine the meanings of words and neither do you get to redefine minors as "consenting adults". Can minor children sign a legal contract? Yes or no? If not then why not?
So? I not allowed to do this? And how I supposed to express my point without shocking them? I'm trying to do in most polite way, that is all I can do. I'm not trolling, okay? I'm expressing my position.
No amount of wishful thinking on your part is ever going to change the REALITY that minor children lack the understanding necessary to engage in sexual intercourse. If you are not prepared to deal with reality then you might as well go over to the conspiracy forum because that is where detached from reality discourse goes on all the time.
They're in minority. Majority don't have what they have. It's a crime right? If not, then your argument is not legit. Yes, pedophiles want to do what majority usually don't want to do, so what? We're talking about harm, you didn't express your own version of hug/sex problem solution yet.
Oh brother! So if a minor child wants to burn down a building they should be allowed to do so? Do you have any clue whatsoever of what you are advocating?
Do you mean I have this disease? In this case you don't need to justify your disease, because it was inborn.
Scientific polling shows that 64% of Americans support gay marriage. http://www.gallup.com/poll/210566/support-gay-marriage-edges-new-high.aspx
By consensus of majority sex with a child is a bigger crime than murder. We do not tolerate children committing murder because "they're young and inexperienced". Why do we tolerate them having sex with each other? There definitely is something wrong in your perception of things. I'm glad to see you're trying to rationalize your hate though.
What I was beaten in? What I didn't asked to? Your multiple posts that children cannot give consent on anything? I answered you many times, that they can give consent in established limits, they cannot give consent on many dangerous or "immoral" things, but it doesn't mean they cannon do it in small things. And yes, "legally" even if I proposed to change legal terms.
Assumes extremist alt right canards not in evidence! Only 15 states still had NOT passed legislation legalizing gay marriage prior to the SCOTUS overturning the unconstitutional federal DOMA legislation. http://gaymarriage.procon.org/view.resource.php?resourceID=004857
I didn't answer your question about "did I ever touched a child in sexual manner". I think it can make "reasonable suspicion" so try.