pedophiles going public

I can get angry and feel hatred from some real stories of abuse of children. Especially by their parents. But not these kind of stories as: "He raped her 45 times and he was arrested when she came to him for the 46"

 

Exactly that is what I do.

 

Oh, the IRONY!

That is exactly what you have been doing in this thread!

It is only YOUR personal irrational belief that pedophiles should be allowed to have sexual intercourse with minor children.

Those arguing against you are upholding the reason based Law of the Land.

 

I don't want to read another study proving correlation, because I never denied correlation. There is a correlation between homosexual sex and risk of drug abuse and suicide rate, it doesn't mean homosexuality itself causes it.

 

Yes, it does!

 

I never denied correlation. Homosexuality is correlated with greater risk of drug abuse and suicide rate, it doesn't mean homosexuality causes it.

 

I'm asking again only if I didn't was answered. And I myself answered every his question.

 

Isn't that a "reasonable suspicion" of impending murder?

 

It seems like you have a fancy for zombie apocalypse fiction.

 

But you do want to change the law so you don't have any option but to discuss the legal nature of consent for that to happen.

 

Give one example of an action that a child can legally consent to?

 

Scientific evidence demonstrates no UNDERSTANDING!

All children want attention so you are disingenuously conflating wanting attention for "willingness" to engage in adult sexual perversion.

That is illegal because minor children have no understanding of what is actually happening to them.

 

Yes, your own posts prove it.

 

There is no solution to hug/sex problem, children cannot legally consent to either. Can you explain why you think children should be given any consent to anything.

 

Because you, and only you, are advocating adults having sexual intercourse with children so the questions are legitimate even if your answers might be self incriminating.

 

And a child cannot consent to either.

 

Ironic given that is what you have been doing all along!

 

Your gut instinct is no different to mine as a parent. However we are Americans and we live under the Law of the Land and not our gut instincts.

So when it comes to instances of child molestation we allow the law to deal with them instead of ourselves. And the law comes down hard on these perpetrators and they end up behind bars where even criminals who are parents have the same gut instincts.

The life of a child sex offender behind bars is probably worse than if they were given the death penalty.

 

I hate to repeat it, but again: What is the difference between sex and hug? Why you don't need informed consent for hugging?

1. I provided them plenty.
2. You don't need arguments for denial, only for claiming.
If you think that hag/sex problem is not an argument, then why no one be able to solve it?

I will repeat it for you:

 

Children can be easily coerced, just one of the reasons a child cannot give consent for anything, they might beg you to have sex with them, tell you they love you, but a child cannot give consent. So whether you want to sooth your conscience or not it is rape the first time and rape the 46th time.

 

If you didn't noticed my opponent's constant failures, it mean you didn't read the thread. There were few of them trying to argue the point though. Most of them just believe that sex is harmful for children with no even trying to argument their beliefs.

 

We have, a child cannot give consent to either a hug or a ****. Now what is your problem understanding that?

 

There is no such thing either. You don't need to be emotionally developed for hugging, and in this sense there is no difference between sex and hug.

 

I completely agree with that.

 

Wrong on all counts!