pedophiles going public

These laws has no reason, and I already explained why, many times.

 

So you think that laws which prevent theft and violence, are aside from normal established boundaries?

 

Popular believes makes truth wrong? How?

 

The law has reason, children cannot give consent because of the development of their minds and intellectual ability. Now either provide evidence that children minds are as developed as adults or concede the point.

 

He arguing that child cannot give "legal consent" and asked my to prove him wrong. And I said that we don't talk here about consent under current laws, we talking about changing laws.

 

Name one thing a child can legally consent to?

 

Hugging his brother or uncle if parents don't mind.

 

You only found something on the internet that suited your nefarious agenda.

Here is the OFFICIAL definition and it says nothing whatsoever about "willingness"

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/consent

Use a DICTIONARY in the future!

 

If you wish to change the law, then you will have to redefine that law. The law is all that maters, you wish to ease your own conscience by talking about will and false equivalence. Name one thing a child can legally give consent to?

 

Quote which.

 

Your disingenuous scenario has been thoroughly debunked in this thread multiple times by different posters.

That you refuse to acknowledge that fact demonstrates a lack of understanding on your part.

 

It is as well legitimate for any one else expressing any believes at all.

 

Wrong, as you have just stated "if his parents don't mind" the child gives consent for nothing. Of course you are even wrong about that "if his parents don't mind and the state allows" should the state decree that his uncle or brother are unsuitable, they will not be allowed to hug the child.

 

Sexual intercourse IS HARMFUL to minor children.

You just destroyed your own "beliefs".

 

Will you discuss this question, what we already do, or will you repeat it again and again and again?

 

"Consent = to express willingness" https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/consent

 

You are the one "spouting nonsense" that is outside of "established boundaries".

I am just exposing that your "beliefs" are outside of "established boundaries" by extrapolating what you are advocating.

 

So let me repeat again, I'm arguing for changing law.

 

I will repeat it again and again and again, until you accept unequivocally the fact that a child cannot give legal consent. And do not say we are not talking about legal consent, it is the only consent that matters, if you wish to change the law.

 

Consent without understanding is coercion.

Obviously you still don't understand the meaning of the terms.

 

But you cannot be imprisoned for a hug unless it was prelude to sex. So how there is no difference in the eyes of the law?

 

Then the only definition of consent important to that is the legal one.

 

Yes you can, it is assault.

 

Assumes facts not in evidence.

You have failed to provide any rationality.

You have failed to provide anything reasonable.

You have utterly failed to provide anything even remotely true.

It is your perverted "beliefs" that are irrational, unreasonable and untrue!

 

Irrelevant, we are talking about the legal age of consent, any other definition of consent is pointless.