NSA Experts Say DNC ‘Hack’ Was Actually a Leak and Inside Job

Fair enough and I don't disagree with some of this, although if you look at the events leading up to Comey being fired any competent business leader would have immediately fired him. If nothing else he was horrible for moral in general and created massive amounts of division. Let's not forget, right up until the hour he was fired the media was going crazy about how Trump and Comey were in cahoots and that is why Hillary won.

I do think now the "Kraken" is in the process of being unleashed with Hillary and that the Republicans will not hold back against anyone else in the near future. From what I saw, Trump was trying to put the HRC stuff aside while getting his base to also put it aside and it was working to a certain degree ..... at first. This obviously would be MASSIVELY beneficial to unity throughout the country. Because of how far the Russia collusion thing is going I think he is now starting to (and will even more harshly continue) strike back against the Democrats.

The Lynch/Clinton story on it's own looks to be a much bigger deal than anything we have seen so far, now that he is taking the gloves off (or so it seems) I think we are going to see much more issues here, but we will see. Way too soon to say anything concrete. In the other case, so far we learned that Russia covertly has been trying to effect American politics and society in general. Not only that, but they basically were doing it throughout Obama's entire term ..... yet all of the sudden we are super pissed.....

Shocking, you people didn't know this already? Heck, what the NSA/Obama was found doing to Germany is worse than this. The main thing people on the Left refuse to discuss is the fact that the information Russia had is that Hillary Clinton was performing some pretty horrible actions. With all that said, I see Trump to have very little to answer for in this aspect and unless they drop a bombshell I don't care.

I think the Democrats are starting to understand that since the story is disappearing. What I don't think they yet understand, is that if they find some random unassociated charge against Trump, there WILL be a backlash as the American people see they have been wasting money on exactly what Trump called it, a Witch Hunt

 

First you're going to need to learn what a question mark means.

 

Why? Did you invent it?

Either you believe the CIA intelligence was truthful when the US invaded Iraq or you don't. You can't just pick blinding allegiance to the CIA or use it when convenient.

 

Interesting stuff. I was amused by that Georgetown U class that investigated the Rich murder and concluded it was either a serial killer or a targeted hit. Headlines about the study left out the hitman part and pretended like it wasn't there.

 

Yah it was all moved to Syria, republicans said so.

 

mmm hmmm. Selective memory I see. Moving the goal posts, I see what you did there comrade.

 

Not surprised one bit. Looking at all the events, I think we already knew this, but it's nice to see more confirmation.

 

Classic.

 

?? Did they say "Hey, we're getting all the information about this Russian hacking from Crowdstrike (http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...-hacking-conclusion-comes-google-linked-firm/) and the Deep State Intelligence cabal
that would love to put Trump in a missile and shoot him towards the sun"?

Not in so many words.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Security_Advisor_(United_States)
How many times should I do this for you? We both know "unmasking the political enemies of your boss
so you can try to incriminate them" isn't part of her job...no matter how many times you pretend otherwise.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Geospatial-Intelligence_Agency
Was one of their guys in a D.C. government lunch room listening to NSA and FBI drones discussing the issue when he volunteered
his opinion?

 

The influence and role of the National Security Advisor varies from administration to administration and depends not only on the qualities of the person appointed to the position but also on the style and management philosophy of the incumbent President

Thanks.

 

Oh, okay. I guess political espionage is one of the unwritten duties of an NSA advisor under Barry Obama.

Thanks for somehow discerning that about Susan Rice and her invisible job description which only you have picked up on.
And it's not at all self serving or a transparent non truth.

 

The same one reached by the trump admin lol

 

So you believe whatever HR McMaster thinks? Well that's convenient. And ridiculous. And self serving.

 

One thing is for certain, dem credibility is in the toilet. I don't see how anyone could believe them. They are going to have to make some big changes if they want to remain relevant in the future.

 

Mello loves obtusery ... Here's the obvious: Comey could have designated that server as a "crime scene". The FBI brought the foreign intrusion to the attention of the DNC. Clearly these foreign hackers presented a much broader threat, and posed a threat to national security. Comey should have seized the server. The lowly capital police seized Schultz computer without hesitation.

 

He's one that's been loudly applauding the raid on Manafort. Manafort was providing all requested materials, and freely granting interviews. Somehow he's oblivious to the hypocrisy?

 

Which government intelligency agency has said that the Russians were not behind the hacking? And the Moron INChief is not an agency And particularly not an intelligence agency.

 

Probably because you would consider them your peers.

 

Sorry should have specified as they occured which should have been obvious for anyone actually following the discussion.

 

I don't know what I am talking about when I say the intelligence agencies agree that it was the Russians? Or is there some other area where you wish to expose your ignorance.

 

Collectivist don't understand the concept of "credibility". They say whatever they want, whenever they want, and expect you to forget they said it later. To them,it's all about how many political points they can score in a given moment.

 

They also said Iraq had nukes. I think they say whatever is politically popular at the time knowing establishment worshipers hang on their every word and have total faith in them.

 

You realize Bill Clinton was sword-rattling against Iraq until he left office over the WMD issue? Or does it just matter if it's "Republicans"?