NSA Experts Say DNC ‘Hack’ Was Actually a Leak and Inside Job

I would suggest that it's largely due to the rank-and-file being young kids that don't understand adult-level scholarship and how to put together a coherent persuasive argument that doesn't contain internal inconsistencies and contradictions that completely invalidate it. They have not yet learned how to critically review a piece of writing for the same flaws and and are thus prone to blindly believing the first crap they come across without question.

They also tend to put emotion ahead of reason and research and argue in diatribes and slurs.

 

Irrelevant. Both the US intel community, and the ex intel analysts relied on the same 3rd party account provided by Crowdstrike. Now you have to equally qualified teams of analysts providing opposing theories based on the same 3rd party data. Neither one can go to the source (DNC server) and independently confirm their analytical assessments to a greater degree of certainty. Why did the DNC invoked the cyberspace 5th amendment, and prevent a forensic analysis? Schultz tried to prevent capital police from analyzing her laptop too. Dems sure like to shield cyber criminals.

 

It's been said, if you're young and you're a conservative, you got no heart. If you're old and you're a liberal, you got no brain... and you're probably on drugs too...

 

I was a leftist until my early 30s, so there's a lot of truth in that saying.

 

Not even the DNC trust the FBI/CIA/NSA to investigate a crime committed against them, but this guy wants us all to believe them when they say something that benefits them politically.

 

I remember back in high school, I thought communism was cool.

 

Since the post I was responding to claimed that all US intelligence agencies did not agree the hack were Russian I asked which agency did not agree. And no the US agencies did not just use the crowdstrike info.

 

And that proves what about your credibility?

 

Bill gets a total pass. Still worshiped to this day.

0 credibility

 

Nothing. Just making a comment on another dudes comment.

 

Bet you cannot find one single quote where any US intelligency agency said Iraq had nukes.

 

Yes we didn't know better because our teachers were filling us with leftist propaganda.

 

I think he meant a nuclear program.

 

He does because this is about situational outrage based on political points.

 

They might not of "had" nukes. But all the alphabets were saying they were working on them. I remember Collin Powel showing us pictures too.

 

That is probably true because most people when they get old have all they are going to get and are only interested in protecting their stuff. And any government spending to help anyone else threatens them with having to contribute. And of course it is well known that the older you get the less accepting of change you become.

 

Oh? They read the official government tea leaves? Now ask yourself why Manaforts house was raided, even though he was compliant with documents requests, but the DNC was allowed to hire a private firm to investigat Russian cyber-warfare. See, the broader national security implications justify gov't seizure of the DNC server ... Manaforts bank records don't begin to compare. Comey is a DNC puppet. The lowly capital police were having none of that nonsense regarding Schultz laptop, and the FBI, sans Comey, is conducting federal raids again. So US intel formed an opinion based on 3rd party analytics ... the opinion is worthless IMO.

 

No way... You saying people wanna keep the stuff they worked for, rather then have some government/leftist type take it away from them and give it to a bum?

Ah yes... The government... The lefts solution to all life's problems. If only it had more money and power.

Change isn't always good. Like fundamentally transforming America from a free country into a Gazi (global socialist) police state run by oligarch out of Europe. Or as our leftist friends like to call it, Utopia.

 

Glad to see you are able to recognize the difference now that I pointed it out. And the phony show that Powell reluctantly did was mostly about chemical weapons which also turned out to be a fraud. Also Powell was not an intelligence agency head.

 

You don't know Manifort was complient with the document requests.

 

But all the intel agreed with him. We should totally trust them right? They would never lie to us to push a political narrative. BELIEVE!!! RUSSIA!!!!

 

Funny then if change is soo bad the moron contingent voted for Trump who promised exactly that. Of course the basic change they voted for was to eliminate the legacy of the uppity black President.

 

This is incredible. The nation's "Free Press" refuses to do any research or cover this event at all. We truly live in an Orwellian period when it comes to our Broadcast News networks. They use our "public airwaves" for Globalist Left Wing propaganda.

 

Manafort wasn't supposed to be trusted ... that's the point isn't it? The DNC shouldn't have been trusted either ... national security. You've glossed right over the real topic, and every point I've raised. You have 2 unconfirmable intelligence summaries. Both equally worthless. You have a pattern of DNC obstruction. You have a pattern of FBI director Comey ignoring standard procedure in procuring evidence. The DNC's obstruction, and destruction of evidence has been rampant and prolific.

 

What delete won't fix a hammer will.