Roy Moore: Gloria Allred’s Refusal to Release Yearbook Proves Allegations Are ‘Completely Untrue’

Not really; it's the definition of how hard it is to authenticate a signature you didn't witness.

It's like reading a polygraph; art not science.

 

It's incorrect "wisdom," but I like Wolfpack.

 

I'd have thought that all sides could agree that Allred is the most lowly scum of the bottom feeder lawyers. And that's a pretty stiff competition!

For her it is entirely about her 15 minutes of fame.

 

No it wouldn't. In order for it to be actionable in court, the aggrieved party has to be identifiable. We are all in here posting anonymously. An individual cannot successfully argue in court that they have suffered ridicule or damage to their reputation when nobody in here knows who they are. No matter what I say, it won't impact anyone in the slightest as they go about their daily business, go to work, church, etc, so there are no damages. (Also, the notion that their reputation suffered because people in here ridiculed them simply won't win in court).

Now if I said someone's real name or the name of a business they owned or gave an identifying characteristic, then that's another matter.

 

You're beginning to get it with that last sentence...

But no, you'd be in a heap of trouble; this *presumption* of anonymity is a false and dangerous concept.

 

Pedo Moore gets a good write up at Breitbart?

It's almost as though there's an alcoholic fascist in charge there who both supports the pedo and likes to declare war on sane Americans.

Has Milo weighed in yet?

 

^ Left field.

 

It's not actionable. There are no damages if someone says something about an individual who has not been identified (and an online user name does not count as identifying someone).

Believe me, I know what I am talking about and is the last I will say on this matter.

 

Believe me, you don't.

You would be massively vulnerable; if you've been informed otherwise, you've been informed badly.

And I'm happy to continue discussing, but maybe someone could start a new thread.

 

Then if you'll allow me one last post beyond the one I said was my final one, I challenge you to present a single case where someone sued and won a defamation lawsuit for something said on an anonymous board.

Now "anonymous" doesn't mean a Yelp! review or eBay feedback where a business is identified by its name (a business name would be considered an identity)..... and anonymous also doesn't mean some Facebook forum where everyone's true identities are out there for all to see.....

If you're right, then I am sure it will be easy to do a quick google search to provide an example.

 

I appreciate your coming back; the problem here is your assumption of anonymity, and how that presumed anonymity works.

I'll give you a hint: virtually no one is anonymous.

My rate is too high to be searching Google on your behalf without a contract, but feel free to look into it; I'm sure you'll find it enlightening.

Oh - but don't test your theory here!

I don't think you would, as you're a decent guy, but you'd not only likely be successfully sued, but you'd put the forum at risk of action as well.

 

Then I guess I'll see you in court counselor.

 

Calling me a lawyer - the ultimate insult!

 

I am not saying the woman is lying, I am not saying the woman is telling the truth, but I will say this:

When you hire Gloria Allred as your attorney, it means you want to draw as much attention to your case as possible.

 

I think Moore is a slug...but I have to agree with all of that.

 

They likely wouldn't agree on an exact date but Fresh is right. They will be able to tell if the writing is 40 years old or only a few weeks or months. There is also the mention of the D.A. in the signature which is how his secretary signed on his behalf.

 

What a joke. Experts, that are bought and paid for, will create doubt, or faith, that is their job.
You are a cynical partisan. Conniving and inauthentic.

 

Maybe Brietbart thinks his readers are stupid. Moore needs to sue the woman he molested.. Then he can get the yearbook in discovery.

 

Make no mistake, the purpose of all this is to torpedo the republican. Once that succeeds, no democrat will care about these women or pursuing Moore, and it'll all just disappear.

Allred is going to draw this out as long as she can, foot-dragging and sandbagging until election day, if possible. Then, if they are successful in thwarting Moore, she and the woman she is representing will fade away, having out lived their usefulness to the democrats.
.

 

Sounds like a plan.

 

Well done. I want to copy this post in response to so many posters on this thread.

 

Hahahahahahaha.

Pathetic attempts by the homophobic pedophile Roy Moore to fool just enough of his remaining supporters that they should elect his constitution-violating ads to the senate.

 

YES.

 

It is evidence.

But it is incredibly weak evidence given the bias and lack of a personal relationship (not to mention the propensity to make troll statements) by the accuser.

 

I challenge you to say to one of the several Republican and Trump supporting women who came forward to tell their, "Roy Moore touched me in a sexually inappropriate manner."