Kicked out of class for telling professor there are only two genders

That constitutes fraud, masquerading as something they're not.

There are only two genders, and their function is to reproduce to ensure the continued existence of the species.

<Mod Edit- Rule 3/4>

 

In the insurance industry I think that it was in the late 1980's or early 1990's that we went from using "sex" to. "gender". But that was before we had the craziness of trannyism and pick your own gender as many times a day as you wish. Bring insurance our actuarial table kept stats on the biological definition of sex.

 

​

sex

1.
either the male or female division of a species, especially as differentiated with reference to the reproductive functions.
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/sex

count them TWO, Male or Female


gender

1.
either the male or female division of a species, especially as differentiated by social and cultural roles and behavior:
the feminine gender.
Compare sex (def 1).
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/gender

count them TWO, Male or Female

under both definitions of sex and gender there is only two male and female
so who is the on that doesn't know the difference between sex and gender when referring to how many each have?
looks like it is you

 

Don't you know telling the truth is a hate crime now

 

"Fagotry".. And I. thought that I was out on the limb with the term homoism.

 

Close, but according to the bike lock wielding college professors of current year academia, there are actually an infinite number of genders.
Thanks for playing.

 

I think if someone spouts bullshit like there being only two genders, they should get corrected.

 

gender

1.
either the male or female division of a species, especially as differentiated by social and cultural roles and behavior:
the feminine gender.
Compare sex (def 1).
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/gender

count them TWO, Male or Female

 

Whatever you call it only a pinhead would expel a student for disagreeing with her

 

The best definition I've heard describing how the new left are currently using the word gender is "fashion". It's nothing but how you present. That's how you end up with these weird ass "genders" like furries and dragonkin. It's all just cosplay.

 

gender


NOUN

• 1Either of the two sexes (male and female), especially when considered with reference to social and cultural differences rather than biological ones. The term is also used more broadly to denote a range of identities that do not correspond to established ideas of male and female.
  
  ‘a condition that affects people of both genders’
  
  ‘someone of the opposite gender’
  ‘everyone always asks which gender I identify as’
  1. 1.1 Members of a particular gender considered as a group.
     ‘social interaction between the genders’
     
     ‘encouraging women and girls to join fields traditionally dominated by the male gender’
  2. 1.2mass noun The fact or condition of belonging to or identifying with a particular gender.
     ‘video ads will target users based only on age and gender’
     
     ‘traditional concepts of gender’
     ‘I'm a strong believer that gender is fluid’
• 2Grammar
  (in languages such as Latin, French, and German) each of the classes (typically masculine, feminine, common, neuter) of nouns and pronouns distinguished by the different inflections which they have and which they require in words syntactically associated with them. Grammatical gender is only very loosely associated with natural distinctions of sex.
  
  
• Notice, there is more than 1 definition to most every word.

 

2.
a similar category of human beings that is outside the male/female binary classification and is based on the individual's personal awareness or identity.
See also third gender.

From you very own linked defintion.
How many you count now?

 

Do you consider oxford dictionaries, left?
How about dictionary.com?
Merriam-Webster?

 

It has nothing to do with liberals or any of that. A school teaches things like gender based on accepted science and academics. It does not teach based upon conservative political correctness or whatever opinion the boy was spouting. When you go to college you pay to learn from the teacher, not from the students. When the student tries to say the teacher is wrong and is offering nothing but faux news and opinions then he is disrupting class and perhaps disrespecting others. I am not paying money for college to have some stupid student teach me. If I wanted his opinion I could watch faux news and their lies for the price of basic cable.

There are things called accreditation and standards of knowledge. The academic world gets together and decides on the syllabus which is the information that is to be taught to the students that they have to learn to pass. Fauxtard boy's opinion is not any part of what the students are learning. There are ways to change and update what is taught in college classes and it is not by shouting out in class and being a stupid monkey. He would have to actually do peer reviewed science and make a case that the syllabus gets changed. Anyone can do that. This is not anarchy and we don't get to just shout out outer ignorant poorly informed opinions as college learning.

 

This semantics argument is all very nice. However shouting out in the middle of class is not how to deal with the situation. If the student feels that the syllabus and information being taught by the school is in error they have a number of methods to be heard. None of which is being a disruption during class and confusing the issue while trying to insult other students. That is not proper classroom behavior and yes he should be tossed. He can go to the Dean and present his case based upon the proper procedures for presenting a grievance or dispute. You do not do it in the middle of class. College is trying to prepare you for the ways the world works, and shouting over the people giving the meeting in the workplace with your dumb ass ideas and showing disrespect to your superiors by undermining their instruction is a great way to get fired. Better fauxtard boy learn his lesson now than to try that stuff in the working world where no one wants to hear your offensive position.

 

I am not a social conservative pariah or tRUMP supporter.
No need to preach to the choir.

I stated earlier in this thread, I doubt this was his 1st go around with this or other professors.
He didn't get tossed out for 1 outburst.

 

Nice dodge of everything I said.
I'm talking about the way humanities professors use it. And things like the dictionary.com definition you just gave -"a similar category of human beings that is outside the male/female binary classification and is based on the individual's personal awareness or identity"- can certainly be twisted into upholding the aforementioned ridiculous crap like "furries." If you make gender so purely subjective, then you may as well say that there are 7 billion genders, one for each person's individual "identity." If we're going to give groups of people representing .0001% of mankind their own gender, why not divide it up just a tiny bit more and give every single person their own gender?

 

Sorry for going that far, but the definition is a distraction from that very point. Because you are correct you don't get tossed out of a college class for speaking out unless you are a constant disruption. He may have been treated more serious because it seems there might have been a guest speaker whom he meant to insult with his comment. That is taken pretty seriously by most colleges because those speakers are often volunteers who really don't need to take crap from some uppity fauxtard student who takes their presence in class as a moment to try and insult who they are. I think the article said it was a transgender pastor who was speaking in a class on Christianity.

The college brings those people in as members of the community to broaden learning. As a trans person I might ask a trans pastor as a guest speaker in a class on the Christian religion how they integrate their self with some of the teachings of the church or bible which may contradict their nature. That would be to get a better idea from the guest speaker about their take on their area of knowledge, but this guy just went straight to biology and was wrong when he did it. That is disrespectful. If the teacher wanted their opinion in a discussion or paper then I would be more sympathetic to his plight even though he was spouting information that was incorrect, but he was just interrupting class and that is not censorship or a freedom of speech issue. That is that people paid to learn not to listen to comments from a dufus. Going towards biology and semantics is a poor argument tactic by faux news and their followers to pretend like this kid is some sort of victim when really he was a disruptive bully who got tossed because he could not behave properly.

 

Look at the context of the student. It was religion class where strict biological terminology would not apply as the subject of the class is Christianity which contradicts biology or takes into account the soul or spirit removing biological functions from the context. So by your own complain the student himself was trying to impose a biological definition on a spiritual idea.

This is the problem when you try to confuse the issue with tangents. You forget to check with the original context and you start to argue against your side. Gender by a spiritual definition from a Christian point of view is not fully biological. A woman remains a woman even if you rip every female part out of her and inject her with male hormones, which is oddly very similar to the idea of trans people that gender is not dependent on just your genitals. Science knows gender identity is maintained in the brain also and is not fully defined by what is between your legs. The brains of men and women operate differently and brain structure of trans people actually looks different from what their genitals are.

 

Do you really believe that? That's probably the dumbest thing I have ever read.

Here's a young Gloria Steinem:

 

Actually it is not fashion. The idea that your genitals are the only function of gender is ignorant and not scientific. There are brain and hormonal differences in males and females. Trans people have brain structures which correspond to the opposite gender of their genitals. This is thought to be because the organs are told what gender to form at different times by hormones. Because the cells look to those signals to differentiate into the organ structures they will become despite having continual DNA this can cause a difference in brain structure and operation from genital formation. Thought and gender identity are biochemical processes of the brain and are actually separated from the genitals which is why a trans person can exist in biology.

Now that you know please do update yourself through science and reading up on the whole process if you are curious. There are actually a number of deep scientific studies and papers out there and some dingbat fauxtard student or faux news network should not be your source of learning because they tend to ignore the wonderful and beautiful world of human physiology and science all together.

 

I have no reason to believe this was a recurring problem. That certainly was not claimed in the discipline referral.

What makes you think it was?

 

Can any of you concerned conservatives tell me why all you so bloody bleeding CARE what gender people want to be? They're not demanding you buy them drinks, are they? Some of you say you just CAN'T be bothered to call them "she" and "her" but I really just can't credit that anyone could possibly be that intolerant . over so picayune a thing, still I don't know. (Actually, yes I do, but lets just leave my opinion of such people unexpressed, as I don't want to be infracted)

 

Because schools protect their students privacy and do not discuss a students disciplinary action with faux news or other news outlets by law so We can only go by what normally happens and that is that you don't get kicked from class for first offenses. The student is the only person who we will hear from because the school does not put out information on students so the student can make up whatever story he wants and we only have his side and our own ability to sense lies along with the reputation of faux news for making stuff up.

 

Bad answer but nice try because this discipline referral was freely and "liberally" quoted
yet no mention at all of a pertinent recurring problem with this student. You are making crap up.

Again, terrible answer. The school has given their version of things within the discipline referral itself.
In fact it is the school who has been able to dictate what the narrative is here. Without input from others in the class, if they feel free to
provide context without school reprisal, we only have the word of a progressive clone to go on. And that's just not good enough.