Kicked out of class for telling professor there are only two genders

Right. And you cited 1 part of 1 definition of the word gender.
The one that conforms what you want everyone to believe. Gender isn't exclusively tied to sex organs.
Humans and animals and other living creatures are set in binary for 100% of a population.

 

What was the formal basis he was removed from the class for? I doubt it was his answer to a question.

 

No, they certainly do not. No one expects you to affirm God, like they do these Role Players.

Biological Science. I realize that's too much for you, but feelings simply aren't a stand in for that. if you're born Male....you're Male, and it doesn't matter what your feelings tell you. Those are mistaken feelings, like a million others....the person who thinks they're 6 people...Superman....etc.

Don't lump me in with you and the other feelerz please. I'm the only one talking about provable, verifiable biological Science.

You and yours are trying to pretend Biology is secondary to unverifiable, obviously mistaken feelings....

 

Don't worry. There won't be a next time since your post is such a disgracefully unproductive waste of time.

See if you can use the trite term "faux" (faux ****, faux student, faux news, etc.) as a prefix even more in the future, the future without me in it, as it does so much for one's credibility to speak in such cliched ignorant phrases.

I don't know how showing the letter Ingle received from his fascist school administration proves he was lying and, of course, neither do you.
That's why I give your post a failing grade (a miserable failure) as an effort at communication and cogent thought from a supposedly rational human being though I can see you are anything but.

Have a nice faux day.

 

Odd how some claimed homosexual people with their own delusions about themselves would degrade others who they also think they have delusions. When those others are not delusional.
Hypocrites I guess come in all flavors.

 

You are expected to treat the 'role players' as any one would treat those who claim to believe something unseen and unproven.

You aren't adept enought to say anything about biological science. And your further statements point that out loud and clear. You have a solid mind set and will not accept anything that isn't in that mind set. That automatically excludes you from anything that has the word science in it.

 

What common sense? You don't exhibit any.
So this student was tossed by this particular instructor. How is that indicative of anything?
You just pointed out this guy has never been tossed before yet you use that as proof he is some sort of disruptive problem student?
Too ridiculous.

 

Not the same, as no one is asking me to affirm the God they believe in, as I am supposed to do with these delusional people. Not even close to the same, shame on you.

Says the feelings crowd. Sorry, but your feelings don't over ride provable Biology. You, and others of like mind are a farce, and are the ones who deny science.

Biology is a hard science, your feelings based LARPing is not.

 

What a cute charming notion you have of academia.
So precious! So uninformed. So naive.

 

That is quite all right with me. My purpose is not to change your mind but rather to rebuke your point of view. I am fine with standing on what I have wrote though you may disagree. You are just wrong and so be it.

 

Yes I did provide the number 1 listed definition of the word "gender".

I've commented on how the culture war the left is waging has co-opted the word, and made it's meaning nothing, and everything.

Attacking and expulsion for failure to abide by these new rules is simply a sign of this offensive.

I don't know that I have anything to add to my thoughts on this.

 

Among other things, you'd be enabling my delusion.

Which might be problematic were you subject to "public accommodation laws".

No, I'm straight up refusing to answer it.

Of course there are, see above.

That would depend on the individual. Bruce Jenner made his delusion everybody's business.

So it's your "good" pleasure to wish mental illness on children. Why am I not surprised?

 

It's amazing that you can't see the glaring flaw in everything you've said, at least to the extent that you are off topic. You keep bringing up trans people in almost every post, and saying things like "male soul in a female body." But what the student said was that there are only two genders, and nothing you've said disputes this. To break this down real simple for you, since you don't seem to get it, IF A MAN GOES TRANS AND "BECOMES" A WOMAN, NO NEW GENDER IS CREATED. And sure as hell stupid crap like a "dragonkin" isn't created. Unless you think God accidentally puts dragon's souls into people?

 

OK, so the truth is, your second sentence was non sequitur from the first, and you know damn well I never said "genitals are the only function of gender" so you're just puffing up to distract from your false implications.

 

His own words. He admitted that he has been called a racist and other words by other professors. In this instance he didn't wait to be called upon but simply started speaking out on a range of silly issues, including debating the gender wage gap.

Finally he was asked to stop but refused to do so simply because he felt he had a first amendment right to voice his opinions in class, which he doesn't.

Not even sure how any of this is debatable.

 

Has anyone found it ironic that he is a senior Religious Studies major in a "Christianity" class who is debating about what science agrees with? Isn't that like a student in a class on evolution arguing about what the Bible says?

 

you have no basis to say or include science in anything. You have a closed mind. The opposite of science.
The farce is in your mind. That is your personal feelings. You have no idea what science even is. Just feelings.

You know, science keeps an open opinion, because as new data becomes available, viewpoints change. Continuously.
Non science folks, think they know everything and nothing will ever change. That is what your mind appears to be. Never ever ever change from what was 100 yrs ago.

 

Right. Try education for once.
It's better than thinking the 1500s were the best of times and all the world should go back to those dark ages.

 

While admitting, that the origin of the word in 1300, didn't fit your definition or the more modern definition.
Then go on to say, now words don't change definition, just add more to the definition.

And you included, 1 part of 1 definition. Only the part your think is pertinent to your closed mind.

There is no culture war, but to those who want to live in the distant past.

You've turned into your great grandparents. A bit early though.

 

Well unfortunately, "left" is a broad term that can mean anything from classical liberals to Marxists. Unfortunately, the former are being supplanted by the latter in academia, as the Bret Weinsteins and Jordan Petersons are pushed out and away by the Melissa Clicks and bike lock wielding Antifa professors.

My wife is in college, and the "social justice" ideology in universities is common knowledge at this point. I really can't tell if you're just being coy here.

They don't just care about them "also". They put them at the top of the progressive stack.

Wow, this is a strange question, since that's exactly what I want to do. Not to just say, "yeah sure, whatever. I guess you're a dog or some asexual species if you say so", but to insist that they be included in with the rest of humanity as men and women.

 

Then cite those words. I haven't seen them.
And so a professor called someone who is even slightly conservative a "racist". Wow! What an incredible indictment! How utterly shocking.
Don't quit the law profession yet...you made need some work on your prosecuting skills.

The OP said Ingle waited for the protected female class to offer opinions and none were forthcoming. So he spoke up. Or do you know more about this than the OP and it's sources?

Well that's sort of the whole crux of the issue, isn't it.
Since I wasn't there, you weren't there, no videos of the problem exist I don't see how you can honestly declare your side the winner here
but I guess honesty isn't your thing, perhaps.

Otherwise you would admit that there is a he said/she said clash between a student and college professor going on in which the professor
holds all the power and she alleges the way in which this student stood up for his beliefs was so abhorrent and unruly she has been forced to call in the powers that be to silence him. And we don't honestly know who is over reacting. You sure don't.

 

No. That'd be you. If left is so broad to you, then your definition of right is very very narrow.
Unless I'm reading your posts wrong and you reading mine wrong.
I say, they are the same as everyone else. Cept for they believe their gender doesn't match their sexual plumbing.

 

I'm using the "standard" political compass.

So, you can see that the right is just as broad as the left. The colleges have always been to the left, but this wasn't a particular problem, because they were libertarian left (classical liberal), but now they're more and more authoritarian left (Neo-Marxist). Libertarians can get along with people who don't agree with them on the left/right spectrum, at least to the extent that they don't try to silence them with threats and violence. Authoritarians, by their very nature, cannot.

 

How are they more authoritarian? Other than you are now older.

 

What makes you think I haven't gone
to a university? What is that even supposed to mean and how does it even remotely cover your Candyland nonsense claim that
academics are always glad to hear opposing points of view and address them? Jeeezuz...that's so lame it should come with a handicap placard.

Actually the 1500s were part of the Renaissance, not the Dark Ages. How do I know? I went to college. Try it sometime, if you can.

And is that you trying to imply I want to go back in time about 600 years when things were all wonderful (in my imaginary opinion you've created for me)? Well isn't that the dumbest thing I've ever heard.

I would be too embarrassed and ashamed to put my most off the wall, ridiculous thoughts in someone else's mouth and pretend I'm representing their opinion but I guess you have no qualms about flat out lying.