Andrew McCabe, a Target of Trump’s F.B.I. Scorn, Is Fired Over Candor Questions

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Steve N, Mar 16, 2018.

  1. dixon76710

    dixon76710 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    58,432
    Likes Received:
    4,459
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They have shown anything yet that Putin had done anything. Nobody in the Russian government has been indicted.
     
  2. Natty Bumpo

    Natty Bumpo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2012
    Messages:
    41,415
    Likes Received:
    14,826
    Trophy Points:
    113
    None attributable to the the Trump Justice Department's Republican Special Counsel or team of investigators, of course.

    Elsewhere, they abound.

    [​IMG]


     
  3. Derideo_Te

    Derideo_Te Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2015
    Messages:
    50,653
    Likes Received:
    41,718
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Here is the TRANSCRIPT of the questions to Comey.

    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...y-of-lying-under-oath-about-anonymous-sources

    McCabe was an AUTHORIZED FBI source for the media.

    Where is credible YOUR proof that he "leaked" anything to the media as an "anonymous source"?
     
  4. Derideo_Te

    Derideo_Te Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2015
    Messages:
    50,653
    Likes Received:
    41,718
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Didn't Mueller indict three Russian Agencies?
     
  5. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    153,911
    Likes Received:
    39,193
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    When you have an actual response let me know. The fact remains she violated the law and went unpunished.
     
  6. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    153,911
    Likes Received:
    39,193
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
  7. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    153,911
    Likes Received:
    39,193
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Dodge noted. YOU made a statement of fact that Putin acted on Trumps behalf, prove it.
     
  8. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    153,911
    Likes Received:
    39,193
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Its your claim the Secretary of State us exempt. Prove it, where does the statute exempt the position?
     
  9. Natty Bumpo

    Natty Bumpo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2012
    Messages:
    41,415
    Likes Received:
    14,826
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So, you cannot refute the CIA's finding that Russia intervened in the 2016 election to help Donald Trump win the presidency. Do you take Putin's word over that of US intelligence services?​

    Apparently, you still cannot offer any reason why Trump, who has the power to fire the Trump Justice Department's Republican Special Counsel, does not do so.

    Your diversions are amusing.
     
    Derideo_Te likes this.
  10. AZ.

    AZ. Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2017
    Messages:
    2,174
    Likes Received:
    2,196
    Trophy Points:
    113
    DOH................He got all of that one! LOL!
     
  11. Derideo_Te

    Derideo_Te Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2015
    Messages:
    50,653
    Likes Received:
    41,718
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Your fallacious opinion is duly noted and ignored since it contains nothing of any substance.
     
  12. Derideo_Te

    Derideo_Te Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2015
    Messages:
    50,653
    Likes Received:
    41,718
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Semantic quibbling does not contribute to the debate.
     
  13. Derideo_Te

    Derideo_Te Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2015
    Messages:
    50,653
    Likes Received:
    41,718
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Factually wrong yet again!

    It is YOU that is fallaciously alleging these bogus charges so the ONUS remains entirely on YOU to prove them.
     
  14. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    153,911
    Likes Received:
    39,193
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I've cited the law that applies, show where it states anyone is exempt from it.
     
  15. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    153,911
    Likes Received:
    39,193
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Words have meanings.
     
  16. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    153,911
    Likes Received:
    39,193
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    When you can refute it get back to me.
     
  17. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    153,911
    Likes Received:
    39,193
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You made a statement of fact that Putin acted ON THE BEHALF OF TRUMP.

    You have yet to prove is was acting on Trump's BEHALF as you claimed.
     
  18. Natty Bumpo

    Natty Bumpo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2012
    Messages:
    41,415
    Likes Received:
    14,826
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The "Lock her up! Lock her up!" hysteria eschews the most basic of constitutional rights, that of due process.

    Incarcerating political opponents - despite intense and prolonged targeting by partisans that uncovers nothing prosecutable - is an extremely unAmerican tactic.
     
    AZ. and Derideo_Te like this.
  19. Derideo_Te

    Derideo_Te Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2015
    Messages:
    50,653
    Likes Received:
    41,718
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You have erroneously cited a law that does not apply since the SoS was NOT handling DEFENSE information.

    Here in America the PRESUMPTION of INNOCENCE establishes that the onus ALWAYS remains on the ACCUSER to PROVE guilt.
     
  20. Derideo_Te

    Derideo_Te Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2015
    Messages:
    50,653
    Likes Received:
    41,718
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ironic given your posts!
     
  21. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    153,911
    Likes Received:
    39,193
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    And I refuted your nonsense the SecState routinely handles NATIONAL DEFENSE information on a daily basis and as was noted in the investigation that included such things as targets for drone strikes. The fact remains even Comey admitted she violated the law.
     
  22. Derideo_Te

    Derideo_Te Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2015
    Messages:
    50,653
    Likes Received:
    41,718
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I am under no obligation to refute endless fallacies since the ONUS remains entirely on you.
     
  23. Derideo_Te

    Derideo_Te Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2015
    Messages:
    50,653
    Likes Received:
    41,718
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Agreed, something that one would expect to find in somewhere like Russia rather than here in America.
     
  24. Derideo_Te

    Derideo_Te Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2015
    Messages:
    50,653
    Likes Received:
    41,718
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Wrong again on all counts. Comey explicitly stipulated that she was NEGLIGENT and that NO LAW was violated.
     
  25. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    153,911
    Likes Received:
    39,193
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    No he just said her violation would not be prosecuted which was utter nonsense.
     

Share This Page