David Hogg pushes Laura Ingraham boycott after Fox News host taunts him over college admissions

You can possess tanks. No problem.

 

After the media entertainer got snarky with the firearm massacre survivor, he appealed to the free market and the inherent decency of the American people.

Her desperate, frenetic footwork was like a scene from a fantasy out of the old west:

​

 

You don't acquire them, you choose them as enemies and appoint them as such; and I must say, I don't think you have anything to be concerned about. You can focus upon the Hogg kid.

 

A 12 ga. Winchester Mod. 1300 can put 36 X .33 cal lead projectiles down range in less than one second.

That's three times more projectiles than a full automatic M-16 A1 can put down range.

 

For a permissiveness advocate, it is, apparently, far less mentally and morally taxing to demonize one teenager as the Second Coming of Schicklgruber rather than confront the determination of the American People to "regulate" in conformity with the requirement of the Second Amendment to the US Constitution.

 

His popularity is waning, but there are still plenty of gullible people.

 

That entitles you to make up stuff?

 

Oh of course, shot guns are next week, be very very afraid. Of school kids.

 

Yes, obviously.

 

OP, looks like he did a good job of it. I'd say he has won. Hopefully the gun fight does not go this way. If they have their way any attachment to the NRA will be bad.

 

Only a decommissioned tank, so not one ready for business.

 

Probably not, but you can kill enough in a short time for the Dems to add them to the call-in list. Really, any gun is subject to confiscation with the Dems. The kids did say if you give an inch they will take a mile. When they call in the black guns, and you give them up, you will have lost your ability to fight the confiscation of the rest. Black guns are the tipping point for all guns. Once they get the black guns they will go down the line, rifles, shotguns, pistols, revolvers.

 

No one in america used their guns to prevent the citizenry of being stripped of a right to Habeas Corpus, the notion that americans will ever use their guns to stand up to an over reaching govt is fallacy; illusions of grandeur.

 

You are not after shotguns today

But sooner or later the gun grabbers will be

 

Not using them illegally

Liberals want to take guns away BEFORE a crime is committed

Its just an excuse for backdoor gun grabbing

 

I have not made anything up

The ultimate goal of your side it gun confiscation

 

Hell - your god-king Trump is the one suggesting suspending Due Process to keep guns out of the hands of crazy people. And he is on record saying it.

 

I think most gun owners will see liberal intentions the same way you do

The left may succeed in taking away my rights but I wont give them a damn thing willingly

 

Trump was wrong about that

You think trump supporters are as knee-jerk for him as people like you are against

But its not so

 

What about the gun loving left and the gun hating right? Or how about the center, who according to public opinion polls support common sense gun controls by a two to one margin?

Oh wait, of course to keep it simple enough for most NRA members its all about right and left partisanship, nuance be damned.

 

Not if you have the required license. There's a place outside of San Antonio where you can get the works including firing the main gun,

 

Hasn't happened and won't happen.

 

They will be on the table when liberals figure out that the most deadly firearm at close range is a shotgun.

 

Those guys were commies too...lol

 

You mean like from a hotel window where he killed 60 people? You mean like a school where he killed 17? Like a club where he killed about a dozen and I can go on and these weren’t at close range