Racemixing is bad, and here’s the science to prove it

Are you aware that you used the scientific term “natural selection”? How did you confuse that with personal choice?

Society is a construct of the biological unit known as the people. People have historically comprised nations based on common background. There has been no long lasting example of a nation with a “rainbow coalition” of people all living right on top of each other in competition. The US was very homogenous for most of its history. What I’m saying was common knowledge up until very recently, when society started falling apart. Coincidence?

 

Here are two studies:

An analysis of more than 3 million respondents revealed the average pay was $15.74 per hour for people of mixed race, $17.39 for black people and $22.04 for white people. This was despite the fact that 18 per cent of mixed-race people had college degrees, compared with 11 per cent of black people and 28 per cent of white people.

( "Can the 'one-drop rule' tell us anything about racial discrimination? New evidence from the multiple race question on the 2000 Census", Robert W. Fairlie, University of California, Santa Cruz )


A study by J. Richard Udry’s National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health, which sampled a random, nationally representative school-based sample of U.S. adolescents in grades 7 through 12, during 1994-1995, showed an increase in behavioral problems amongst mixed-race children, as well as significantly higher rates of asthma, and generally poorer health. Another interesting finding was that mixed children that had a black parent were significantly more likely (63% more) to have skin problems.

( J. Richard Udry, Janet Hendrickson-Smith, Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2003 )


Now, as I often like to point out, correlation does not necessarily imply causation.
It could be, for example, that those with lower levels of genetic fitness (and thus less desirable in the dating pool) are more likely to racially intermarry and pass down deleterious genes to their mixed offspring.

 

I would have thought this kind of post was beneath you, but apparently not. I must have hit close to home. Be sure and say hola for me.

 

No I haven’t. But is this where you tell us all about how every black person you know is just like you, has your culture?

 

Not based on history. I’m sure a Marxist sociology professor would say that, though.

 

Right Alex, any non-Jewish white person who isn’t totally jazzed about whites being blended out by the non white global majority like you are is just a dumb loser. Thanks for the reminder.

 

Natural selection, process that results in the adaptation of an organism to its environment by means of selectively reproducing changes in its genotype, or genetic constitution.

https://www.britannica.com/science/natural-selection

Do you still need to have the birds and bees chat with a parent to find out how humans reproduce?

So again, who should have the authority to tell you who you can mate with? Do you think that's a function of society, or do you think you should have independent control of that choice?

 

*Refuses to state ethnicity*
*Argues white people are a genetic defect and the world will be a better place without them*

Now I’m convinced what your ethnicity is.

“I’ve been found out”

 

I didn't get to know her parents very well, but I know she is very smart and has earned some major scholarships. Truth be told, my objection to her was because she is older than my son and not because of race. That ship has sailed and he has moved on. He's only 16, so I don't want to see him get too serious about anybody right now.

 

Brazil tried to get rid of their Blacks that way.

history of race in Brazil

 

The vitamin D explanation has its detractors, but is still going strong. On top of that, there are actually three genes for light skin, and they have different origins. One was tied to the spread of agriculture, and the others predated agriculture at far northern latitudes. “White people” exist where all three came together.

http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2015/04/how-europeans-evolved-white-skin

 

Genetic diversity/variance, is essential to the survival of any species. But for genetic variances, ANY of the world's great pandemics would have caused the human race to become extinct. For individuals or even groups, a genetic variance can cause negative results, but collectively as a species more greater the genetic diversity, the more survival capable the species becomes.

 

I don't have a problem with the fact that they knew the theory even if they couldn't follow it entirely. We've made progress.

We ARE homogenous in our founding documents that state human equality.

America's best days are THIS century. There isn't any comparison. The desire to take America back to some former time is just plain idiotic - and in your case it's an expression of pure racism.

 

The example I gave is of natural selection. You’re describing mate selection, which is different. You’re telling me you don’t mate white whites because it’s genetically disadvantageous for you to do so? If so, explain.

And I, nor the video creator, are talking about laws being enacted. If the people don’t believe in it they would just repeal it anyway, so there is no point. The point of the video is to show how mixed relationships are overall harmful compared with same sex relationships, and they should not be promoted like they currently are in society.

 

The video deals with this issue and makes a very strong counterpoint to it.

Why couldn’t you admit what your ethnicity was? There’s no shame in it.

 

The founders never wanted what we have now. That ‘s why they explicitly limited naturalization to whites only. They could have opened it up to all, but they didn’t. They wanted this to be a white country, and had laws in effect to ensure this.

Your view is historical revisionism.

We are more divided as a country now than at any time since the Civil War. No clue how you could possibly argue these are America’s best days.

 

Agreed. It's racist nonsense. Next we'll see a post on phrenology by KKK members.

 

Most of those are cultural not genetic. The rest is just racist bullshit.

 

Is it really fair to automatically just blame it on culture?

 

So what?

Which you base on feels

 

It's not different. One is a process of the other. It's the specific process you're complaining about.

I told you nothing about my mate choice. This is about you wanting to convince others to make choices. So I want to put that theory to the test. Who should choose for you? It's a simple test. If you think you can make better choices than others, then someone must be better equipped to make choices for you. This is about the concept you're espoucing. You don't really believe it if you're not willing to accept that someone else has the ability to make a better mate choice for you.

 

We are of one race. It's called the human race. No marxism involved. Humans preclude marixism by millions of years.

 

Race is genetic, culture is learned. Racism is ostensibly based on genetics; usually whites believing they are superior to "the mud people". Isn't that what is said at your meetings?

Not "feels", science.

 

The OP message is notably dehumanizing as in his view people should not marry for love, but for eugenics as if marriage is for breeding your own children as if breeding cattle.

 

Irony levels over 9000.