It’s strange that you keep claiming that when it didn’t happen. Where is that in the report? Is the IG going under the deep state bus now? Not everyone can be in on this conspiracy lol
Bias? Odd... “We did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that improper considerations, including political bias, directly affected the specific investigative actions we reviewed,”
“(Trump’s) not ever going to become president, right? Right?!” Page wrote to Strzok, Bloomberg reports. “No. No he’s not. We’ll stop it,” Strzok reportedly replied.
He had more confidence in the US justice system than he should have. “We did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that improper considerations, including political bias, directly affected the specific investigative actions we reviewed,”
They are entering flat Earth conspiracy territory where every space agency, government, employee ect. In the entire world are involved. It's the definition of paranoid delusion. Occam's Razor
the usual suspects hated the FBI, then they loved the FBI, then they hated the FBI, now they love the FBI. Follows right along with their love/hate relationship with the Patriot Act, NSA, wiretapping.... if it helps them politically, they're in love if not, they want blood. lest we forget, these are supposed to be unbiased, non-politicized agencies... salt upon the soil, leftists. they destroy everything they touch. (all because they want more free stuff)
Because they feared the emails coming out AFTER the election, and their corruption exposed....they only released them when they were SURE she would win anyway. Hillary's CRIMES, and her buddy's (Abedin) idiocy, are what harmed her... Please show us ALL THE VOTES that changed.
She lied to Comey, and he admitted it. She illegally handled classified data, which is a CRIME. She destroyed SUBPOENAED emails, which is a CRIME. She destroyed evidence with the help of the Obama Swamp KGB-FBI/DOJ, in the form of cell phones and other devices. As I said, many times, and you continue to prove, the left doesn't care about their CRIMES, only that they get away with them.
Wasn't it Strzok who changed the language in Comey's draft from "gross negligence" (a crime) to "extreme carelessness" (same thing, but not a crime)? If so, it appears that Strzok's actions contradict the OIG's findings, as well. The statement you cited and the arguments that Clinton supporters are basing on it are some seriously weak sauce...
FBI Director James Comey confirmed on Thursday that some of Hillary Clinton's statements and explanations about her email server to the House Benghazi Committee last October were not true, as evidenced by the bureau's investigation into whether she mishandled classified information. During an extended exchange with Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.), Comey affirmed that the FBI's investigation found information marked classified on her server even after Clinton had said that she had neither sent nor received any items marked classified. "That is not true," Comey said. "There were a small number of portion markings on, I think, three of the documents." "Secretary Clinton said she used one device. Was that true?" Gowdy asked, to which Comey answered, "She used multiple devices during the four years of her term as secretary of state." Gowdy then asked whether it was true that Clinton, as she said, returned all work-related emails to the State Department. "No, we found work-related emails, thousands that were not returned" Comey said. "Secretary Clinton said neither she or anyone else deleted work-related emails from her personal account. Was that true?" Gowdy asked. "That's a harder one to answer," Comey responded. "We found traces of work-related emails in, on devices or in slack space. Whether they were deleted or whether when a server changed out something happened to them, there is no doubt that the work-related emails that were removed electronically from the email system." https://www.politico.com/blogs/jame...07/clinton-untrue-statements-fbi-comey-225216 VIDEO INCLUDED. Der....
Oh nooos!! You overlooked this! The inspector general concluded that Strzok’s text, along with others disparaging Trump, “is not only indicative of a biased state of mind but, even more seriously, implies a willingness to take official action to impact the presidential candidate’s electoral prospects.” The messages “potentially indicated or created the appearance that investigative decisions were impacted by bias or improper considerations,” the inspector general wrote. https://www.pressherald.com/2018/06...-in-clinton-email-case-set-for-release-today/
Gonna have to use that as a reply to the line Mellow Guy has been spamming the board with. Good find.
Isn't it hilarious to watch all the Leftist parrot that same fake news talking point from Bloomberg. All of them are parroting that same lie verbatim. Meanwhile, back in reality, the OIG Report is FULL of political bias. This on page 420 of the OIG Report: "We also asked FBI Attorney 1 what she understood FBI Attorney 2 to mean when he messaged, “Viva le resistance.” http://www.foxnews.com/politics/int...-ig-report-on-hillary-clinton-email-case.html How is FBI agents texting each other about "the resistance" NOT political bias? The entire OIG Report is FULL of political bias.
I of course expect FBI agents to keep their opinions to themselves and keep their opinions out of their jobs. I expect politicians to keep their personal hateds out of politics.
They have no obligation to keep it to themselves so long as it doesn’t impact their work. Something there is no evidence occurred.
The OIG Report is full of evidence. You look really silly parroting all those fake news talking points.
Comey exonerated HRC before ever interviewing her. How could you say he hurt HRC and helped Trump. You guys do not live in reality.