1) It is important to remember that the IG has not looked into the FBI’s “Russia investigation,” including its continuance by Bob Mueller, and today’s report does not specifically address issues raised by the FBI’s and DOJ’s handling of that matter. However, some of the same people were involved in both investigations, and the IG has disclosed limited materials relating, at least in part, to the Russia investigation. At this point, they are some of the most interesting aspects of the report. But such disclosures are incidental and non-systematic. There could be a great deal more where they came from......snip~ http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2018/06/notes-on-the-ig-report.php
1) It is important to remember that the IG has not looked into the FBI’s “Russia investigation,” including its continuance by Bob Mueller, and today’s report does not specifically address issues raised by the FBI’s and DOJ’s handling of that matter. However, some of the same people were involved in both investigations, and the IG has disclosed limited materials relating, at least in part, to the Russia investigation. At this point, they are some of the most interesting aspects of the report. But such disclosures are incidental and non-systematic. There could be a great deal more where they came from......snip~ http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2018/06/notes-on-the-ig-report.php
1) It is important to remember that the IG has not looked into the FBI’s “Russia investigation,” including its continuance by Bob Mueller, and today’s report does not specifically address issues raised by the FBI’s and DOJ’s handling of that matter. However, some of the same people were involved in both investigations, and the IG has disclosed limited materials relating, at least in part, to the Russia investigation. At this point, they are some of the most interesting aspects of the report. But such disclosures are incidental and non-systematic. There could be a great deal more where they came from......snip~ http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2018/06/notes-on-the-ig-report.php
Birthday present for Mello. 1) It is important to remember that the IG has not looked into the FBI’s “Russia investigation,” including its continuance by Bob Mueller, and today’s report does not specifically address issues raised by the FBI’s and DOJ’s handling of that matter. However, some of the same people were involved in both investigations, and the IG has disclosed limited materials relating, at least in part, to the Russia investigation. At this point, they are some of the most interesting aspects of the report. But such disclosures are incidental and non-systematic. There could be a great deal more where they came from.....snip~ http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2018/06/notes-on-the-ig-report.php
1) It is important to remember that the IG has not looked into the FBI’s “Russia investigation,” including its continuance by Bob Mueller, and today’s report does not specifically address issues raised by the FBI’s and DOJ’s handling of that matter. However, some of the same people were involved in both investigations, and the IG has disclosed limited materials relating, at least in part, to the Russia investigation. At this point, they are some of the most interesting aspects of the report. But such disclosures are incidental and non-systematic. There could be a great deal more where they came from......snip~ http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2018/06/notes-on-the-ig-report.php
Here is what the leftness buried over yesterday. They were having to much trouble with reality. IG Report : What the leftness is trying to ignore or downplay..... http://www.politicalforum.com/index...tness-is-trying-to-ignore-or-downplay.535110/ You will notice immediately that the leftness was quite absent. As usual running away from reality.
Yes, specifically, what nefarious antics did any US intelligence service employees indulge in to subvert the candidacy of either Clinton or Trump?
But now we can begin to read it and decide for ourselves what the intent is. The problem all along is that the "deep state" has decided for us, up until now.
The fake news MSM have not given the parrots their response to those topics yet. Give it a day or two. They will be back parroting verbatim what the fake news MSM tells them. LOL .... You didn't think they had an original thought to debate this topic hot off the press did you? Don't be silly .... You know who these low/no information parrots are. Give 'em a day or two to get their fake news MSM fabricated talking points.
Fantasizing about a "deep state" boogie man does not exempt true believers from showing documentary or testimonial evidence that improper considerations, including political bias, directly affected any investigative actions. That a few FBI employees wanted to prevent Trump becoming president merely aligned them with the majority of Americans who expressed the same sentiment at the polls on November 8, 2016.
The deep state has decided for the sheeple. It's the normal thinking Americans that are the problem. You know ... The deplorables ... The bitter clingers, etc.
Yes. I can find no accounts of improper acts intended to sabotage the 2016 election by anyone - other than Putin's.
The language was designed as soft enough for the Leftist MSM to be able to spin it as being favorable to the Left. But they no longer have gate keeper control.
"a few FBI employees" were first and second in command regarding HRC's e-mail investigations and they dropped the ball in favor of overturning a duly elected President. Could not have even come close without the full support of players in the Obama administration......not to mention collusion with the IRS that targetted specific Conservatives admittedly.
I know ..... And, the sheeple are going to bleat ... right on Que. But, keep in mind ... the sheeple were unable to elect HRC. It was the normal thinking Americans in this Country that ruled the election. And, who was their choice? From the beginning?
Bias or an Appearance of Bias - Judicial Disqualification ... www.judicialrecusal.com/bias-appearance-bias In part because of their recognition of the fact that judicial bias can seldom be proved, legislatures in many jurisdictions have authorized parties to seek disqualification on the basis of an “appearance” of judicial bias or impropriety. DOJ: FBI texts create an appearance of bias - CNN Video CNN Byron York: How political bias infected FBI Trump, … The Washington Examiner 20 hours ago · It didn't take long for defenders of the FBI's Trump-Russia investigation to claim that the Justice Department inspector general's report found no bias in the bureau's conduct of the Hillary Clinton email investigation, nor in the early days of the Trump-Russia probe. FBI to require political bias training after damaging IG ... The Washington Examiner 1 day ago · ... the FBI nonetheless agreed that “the appearance of bias is ... political bias,” the FBI as part of its ... of misconduct by FBI ...
I don't think the sheeple are going to get that point. But, the rest of the normal thinking Americans do.
As you can see.....the majority of the leftness doesn't understand what Misconduct is within the FBI. Hence all that BS about its okay for FBI Investigators to give an appearance of bias. Show partiality, show bias while investigating someone that don't like. Key is investigating someone that they cannot remain impartial or objective. Of course its why the leftness always did have trouble with Ethics and Ethical Conduct. The MeToo Movement validated that with leftists and the culture they created. Mums the word!