What is a space force Mr trump?

Quite clearly involving Nasa and space , you must need anti-gravity right ?

You need a Dirac negative energy ocean right ?

-0.5 q + 0.5 q = 0 q

Where q is charge and 0 is constant ''right across the board''.

Did you know , that two opposite signed charges can occupy the same point simultaneously ?

 

Nope...…..not right.

 

You can call it a Higg's field, you can call it space-time, you can call it an electromagnetic field, you can call it an electrical field, the summation remains the same

 

you can call it whatever you wish...it is still wrong.

 

So you are trying to say there is no fields between masses?

Nothing at all, no-thing, no energy, nothingness?

So how is my equation wrong ?

 

Nope..I was replying to your assumption that a Trump Space Force requires anti gravity or a "Negative Energy Ocean" whatever that is.

 

Well it would be a rather rubbish space force if it were relying on conventional space travel . More like space weak ass force.

 

And you know this because of your high military clearance and access to black ops technology?

Is that where you found out about "Negative Energy Ocean" and anti-gravity use?

 

Huh? Mr Trump made an announcement about space force?

Space means space ships I should imagine, so I assume Nasa or other will be trying to find anti gravity mechanism. Assumptions not black opps lol.

I already had my field equation.

 

It means nothing of the sort. It means putting weapon launch platforms in orbit. Satellites with payloads.

The only members of space force that actually enter space are those who are sent up to perform maintenance on those satellites.

 

Oh right , I was doing flying saucers. Never mind ...

 

Okay....I guess I was simply confused by this:
"
Quite clearly involving Nasa and space , you must need anti-gravity right ?

You need a Dirac negative energy ocean right ?"

-0.5 q + 0.5 q = 0 q

Where q is charge and 0 is constant ''right across the board''.

Did you know , that two opposite signed charges can occupy the same point simultaneously ? "

My guess would be you meant a Dirac Sea and your equation attempts to define infinite energies that equalize perceived reality.

 

I said ocean because a sea seems small. My equation is the summation of the entire universe , not only for fields but also for atoms.

A binary energy system of an A.B product.

 

I see....so not actually having anything to do with anti-gravity, NASA or a space force......got it.

 

Having everything to do with anti gravity.

 

I suppose then you will now explain how negative/positive electron interaction in the hypothetical Dirac Sea will allow for manipulation of Gravity. This should be very interesting....and before you say it, your equation is inadequate and basically states the obvious with no actual data.

 

A spider cannot traverse a web without a web , assuming the field exists, an anti gravity device will have to curve space- time towards itself to pull itself ''up''. While at the same time pushing.

 

Heh....uh....yeah.

Have A Nice Day

 

Did we not take part in signing a UN treaty in the 60s with other nations concerning not using space for most military purposes including weapon platforms in orbit?

Ok here the link.

Does Trump ever run anything by experts before he opening his mouth?

https://www.state.gov/t/isn/5181.htm

 

No he just feels free to renege on any agreement the US has signed in the past. Wouldn’t be the first time. Not even close.

 

Frankly, I don't know of ANY time Trump has created a policy where it involved accepting expert advice.

And, this idea of weaponizing space is just plain startling.

The very idea of dumping our agreements on this and starting an arms race in space could not POSSIBLY be more stupid.

 

Not to mention that having bright kinetic weapons in orbit would be far worst for us then most nations given our aircraft carriers being a wonderful and worthwhile targets for such weapons.

 

Far liver worst ?

 

You would have to put a force field around the carriers.

 

LOL............