Jeff Sessions: Peter Strzok's FBI security clearance has been revoked.....

Yeah Sessions Right now should be more concerned about Susan Rice, telling Cybersecurity to stand down from preventing Russians from meddling.


http://www.politicalforum.com/index...from-susan-rice.535701/page-2#post-1069244648

 

As always...the Obama Swamp drones couldn't care less about the growing list of the Obama Swamp's crimes; all they care about is that they GET AWAY WITH THEM. PERIOD.

 

Today I'm reading about how Obama had the FBI stand down on efforts to counter Russian meddling in the election. The longer this investigating of Trump's collusion with Russian to defeat Hillary, the worse it looks for everyone involved except Trump. Mueller is still searching for that smoking gun and the questions keep piling up; the pre-determined decision to exonerate Hillary for her emailings, growing evidence Russians were not involved in the DNC revelations, dismissing any significance from the Bill/Lynch meeting, the delay in examining Weiner's laptop, reliance on that dossier, not disclosing its provenance, not questioning the use and payment of foreign agents by Hillary in her campaign, the evident pre-investigation surveillance of Trump's campaign team, apparent efforts to entrap team members using infiltrators or spies, mischaracterizing the investigations to keep Trump in the dark, all the leakage, the unmasking of Trump team members to the media, using the same team who investigated Hillary to look into Trump, having Strzok's lover as McCabe's attorney to circumvent the chain of command directing Strzok's efforts, this counterintelligence agent's explicit bias and manipulation of the investigative effort... I'm sure I've missed as many of the 'blotches' as I've referenced in this effort to oust Trump. By now we know "integrity" is not an apt motto for the FBI. Mueller's effort stinks and it will just stink more the longer he keeps at it. Trump can't do anything about it because it will be claimed to be "obstruction", but at some point the odor will be too strong.

 

There are more and possibly far more damaging e-mails and/or Tweets
by Strzok that the Justice Dept. has refused { c/o of Rosenstein }
to release.Rosenstein and his dept. have been issued subpoena to turn
all those over or else.Jim Jordan is at his wits end.Rosenstein was
was given notice a few times already since January.Jordan is set to
have an Impeachment vote for Rosenstein as early as next week if all
those messages by Strzok aren't turned over.
I just bet those Strzok messages mention those like Rosenstein
and maybe Obama himself.Meaning this Strzok traitor is in a world of
trouble.The noose is tightening.

 

Dr.Jerome Corsi { no one knows more about this } believes that
Trump being elected President was in some way By the hand of God.
Meaning almost a miracle.And that eventually we are gonna find out how
it was Hillary who was the one colluding with Russia.Not merely her huge
profiting of a Russian Uranium deal but also slyly selling or trading
Government secrets to Russia in order for that sweet Uranium deal.
Mueller knew all this and it explains why he is so hellbent on Impeaching
Trump.The bottom line is how Hillary and Obama purposedly Framed
Donald Trump in order to insure Hillary's presidency.They concocted a
False Russian narrative by installing American agents around like
Carter Page and George Papadopolos asking and baiting questions
of Trump people about Russia.To set the stage that Trump was interested
in helping Russia.When it was Hillary.That is why Hillary made such a huge
deal over how Russia hacked our Elections.Plus all the Democrats in the
Senate have been using Hillary talking pts. in order to back her sorry ass
up.This means a Hillary and possibly Obama Treason Trial.
What Hillary and Obama pulled was The most flagrant abuse of
government authority in our history.The Framing of a Candidate and
then the efforts to keep him Framed after winning the White House.
What Richard Nixon did in Watergate was childs play in comparison.

 

THE FBI HAS FLUSHED ITS REPUTATION: YouGov: FBI’s Popularity Plunges Since February As Plurality Of Independents Now View Agency Unfavorably.

“It’s not just that the FBI’s favorability has declined, it’s that it sunk from a 52/29 majority in favor of the agency in February to a narrow 43/35 plurality now. It’s no longer the case that most Americans view the federal government’s chief law enforcement arm, which presents itself as the consummate by-the-book professional police force, in a positive light. And as I note in the headline, it’s not just Republicans who feel that way.”​

 

House Judiciary Committee chairman Bob Goodlatte subpoenaed FBI agent Peter Strzok Friday — days after an attorney for the embattled investigator said he would testify voluntarily before Congress.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...utm_campaign=Feed:+breitbart+(Breitbart+News)

 

Yeah, all that BS by the Demos and their Cult following about the Repubs trashing the FBI's reputation is just that.....BS.

The FBI is doing a great job in damaging their own credibility.

 

Yep, all due to Strzok not giving a date as to when he would voluntarily come. Oh hey, I will come on down, just don't know when. lol

Goodlatte wasn't falling for it.

 

When I was young, I really enjoyed watching Elliott Ness and the Untouchables (they weren't part of the FBI). They were called the Untouchables because they wouldn't take a bribe. Here is today's FBI.

.
FBI employees received 'improper' gifts from reporters, routinely leaked to media without authorization: IG report


Numerous FBI employees accepted inappropriate gifts from reporters and routinely spoke to media outlets without authorization during the Hillary Clinton email probe, the Justice Department's watchdog revealed in Thursday's long-awaited accountability report.

Along with the FBI's cozy relationship with the media, Horowitz's report charges that officials in the bureau at "all levels of the organization" leaked information to reporters without authorization.

The FBI's strict media relations policy, which explains specifically who can disclose information to the media, was "widely ignored" during the Clinton email probe and afterwards, the IG report said.


"We identified instances where FBI employees improperly received benefits from reporters, including tickets to sporting events, golfing outings, drinks and meals, and admittance to nonpublic social events," reads the report by the inspector general, Michael Horowitz.

And who was tasked to find who was leaking? The FBI.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...to-media-without-authorization-ig-report.html

 

Along with the FBI's cozy relationship with the media, Horowitz's report charges that officials in the bureau at "all levels of the organization" leaked information to reporters without authorization.

The FBI's strict media relations policy, which explains specifically who can disclose information to the media, was "widely ignored" during the Clinton email probe and afterwards, the IG report said.....snip~


But no evidence of decisions that were made due to political bias, huh?

 

And today Gateway Pundit has an article on some intelligence oversight committee's mounting evidence Mueller altered '302's' (summaries of FBI witness questioning), specifically the one prepared by Strzok after interrogating Flynn (remember Strzok testified in Congress he did not think Flynn lied).

If Mueller ever tried to indict anyone on Trump's team for colluding with Russia his evidence would be so tainted it would never be admissible in court.

The most charitable take on Trump's opponents might conclude they genuinely believed he did collude, but as time passes and no smoking gun, instead of moving on they're digging in searching for evidence. By now, with all the evidence of bias, fraudulent claims, distorted leaks, concealed contrary evidence, false statements and wrongful conduct, it would be too controversial for anyone to rely on anything Mueller came up with.

 

They lie, they are untrustworthy, they are the college boys with guns who think they are the guardians of the "progressive" State. They illegally spy, try to fix elections, and failing that, try to drive the winner from office, and per Chuck Schumer, this isn't new and it's yet another open secret.

Had Hillary won, this would have all remained buried and even now would be getting "progressively" worse.



That evidence of Strzok’s bias is disastrous for Mueller, perhaps bad enough to render some subjects of the investigation unconvictable. If a growing number think the FBI has mishandled the probe, how likely is it that a jury will either disagree or ignore that possibility and convict anyway? How likely is it that there’ll be 218 votes in the House for impeachment under these circumstances?

For Dems, election night 2016 is the nightmare that never ends.

https://hotair.com/archives/2018/06...ity-independents-now-view-agency-unfavorably/

 

Any evidence of this? Other than some guy and his GF sexting each other?

 

If you haven't been following this, you think I'm going to catch you up with a forum post. Get your google on, Son!

 

Did you mean decisions based off political bias?


http://www.politicalforum.com/index...din-messages-and-more.535754/#post-1069248451

 

I think Rock was pointing out that prosecutors do not need to let these people cop a plea.

 

Decisions made by others than Strzok or McCabe.

As for the emails on Weiner's computer, isn't that why Comey reopened the investigation much to the dismay of Hillary and fans?

 

Yes. If they can force a plea, it won't go before a jury. But, there are rules these dirty crooked prosecutors have to follow as the I expect the Judge in the Flynn case is going to explain to the nation in his ruling, unless Dirty Bob played it by the book, which is always possible, but so far, there is no evidence of that. In fact, it looks like he is a dirty filthy inept bumbling cheating crook who fancies himself a mob boss.

 

Gowdy was saying before that he didn't think there was a need for a 2nd Special Counsel. He now needs to lead that pack in calling for one.

If he doesn't.....then the Repubs just don't want to do anything about this deliberate slim shady that was taking place.

 

Sat on them for nearly a month first, finally came forward when he feared it would leak and he was comfortable that she was heading for a landslide victory. We only said that he is a lying crook, we never said he was smart!

 

Yep Decisions by others above Strzok and Page.

Well Comey opening that.....as now one can see was due to an FBI agent running to the SDNY about the Slim shady that took place. Just with that issue alone.

 

I agree they should not plead out Strzok...although I suspect they will. As for his GF, Page, favoring one candidate over another isn't a crime. Only if she abused her power to favor one candidate over another is there a possibility of prosecution. Based on the article linked below, her involvement was minimal and mainly consists of her texts with her BF. Either way, it's wrong to abuse power and, IMO, Strzok did exactly that although I doubt he'll go to jail over it.


http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/06/14/strzok-page-and-fbi-texting-scandal-explained.html
As Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into Russian influence in the 2016 election continues, two former members of his team are under scrutiny for text messages they exchanged about President Trump and the probe.

In the messages, Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, who were romantically involved, bashed Trump and discussed concerns about being too tough on Hillary Clinton during an investigation into the use of her private email server. And when Page asked if Trump would ever become president, Strzok reportedly replied, "No. No he won't. We'll stop it."

The pair exchanged some 50,000 text messages throughout the presidential election and first year of the Trump administration, many of them with anti-Trump sentiments.

Inspector General Michael Horowitz is expected include some of the controversial text messages in a report regarding Clinton's email case.

Other text messages show an allegiance for fired FBI Director James Comey. Page said, in one message, that she had wanted to "see what the FBI could become under him."

Here’s a look at who exchanged the text messages – and who would eventually leave the FBI.

 

Eventually.

"The October 3 email was serialized and inserted into the ***Weiner*** case file in Sentinel, the FBI’s case management system, on October 5.
The case agent told the OIG that no one had contacted him about the laptop and, as the case agent, “the only person who has the authority to release that laptop’s image is me.” The case agent explained his growing concern by stating:
The crickets I was hearing was really making me uncomfortable because something was going to come crashing down.... And my understanding, which is uninformed because...I didn’t work the Hillary Clinton matter. My understanding at the time was I am telling you people I have private Hillary Clinton emails, number one, and BlackBerry messages, number two. I’m telling you that we have potentially 10 times the volume that Director Comey said we had on the record. Why isn’t anybody here? Like, if I’m the supervisor of any CI squad in Seattle and I hear about this, I’m getting on with headquarters and saying, hey, some agent working child porn here may have [Hillary Clinton] emails. Get your ass on the phone, call [the case agent], and get a copy of that drive, because that’s how you should be. And that nobody reached out to me within, like, that night, I still to this day I don’t understand what the hell went wrong.
The case agent told us that he scheduled a meeting on October 19 with the two SDNY AUSAs assigned to the Weiner investigation because he felt like he had nowhere else to turn. He described AUSA 1, the lead prosecutor, as a friend. He added, “I felt like if I went there and [AUSA 1] got the attention of Preet Bharara, maybe they’d kick some of these lazy FBI folks in the butt and get them moving.” The case agent stated that he told the AUSAs in detail about the emails he had seen between Clinton and Abedin. He continued:
And I told her, I’m a little scared here. I don’t know what to do because I’m not political. Like I don’t care who wins this election, but this is going to make us look really, really horrible. And it could ruin this case, too. And...I said the thing that also bothers me is that Comey’s testimony is inaccurate. And as a big admirer of the guy, and I think he’s a straight shooter, I wanted to, I felt like he needed to know, like, we got this. And I didn’t know if he did." 303 (*** mine)

Office of the Inspector General, U.S. Department of Justice, OVERSIGHT* INTEGRITY *GUIDANCE
A Review of Various Actions by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Department of Justice in Advance of the 2016 Election
Oversight and Review Division 18-04 June 2018.
https://www.justice.gov/file/1071991/download