Gay PRIDE Parade Is Really a SHAME Parade

Those of us with a reading age above high school level (and I suspect even some below that) understand that a question can be used as a statement. That is clearly what you are doing. No surprise that you are trying to weasel out of it now.

I am sure you think there is a point to that story. Maybe one day someone will find it. What is clear is that your idea of a 'normal' society is the Muslim world or some of the less pleasant parts of Africa. I suppose we all have different ideal societies. Mine are the modern, prosperous, democratic societies of the Western world where homosexuality is just part of the diverse fabric of life. I live in such a society and it is 'normal' to me. Clearly that is just my 'first world' mentality. If you want to elevate backward third world cultures to some sort of ideal that is on you. I'll stick with the more successful model.

 

Their supporters? Are these supporters gay or straight?

 

Because it's parasitical and dehumanizing.

Then so are pedophiles. Enjoy.

 

I personally don't like school kids being told about sex outside of the reproduction aspects and how to protect oneself from disease.

Must be a real liberal Place years kids went to school.

 

The question isn't whether you like that, but whose responsibility that is.

Would you care to take a whack at that one? Is it the state's or the parents?

 

Before the brave new world it would have been parents.

Yeah schools are doing a lot of things parents should be doing

 

Which is a problem. Teachers aren't parents, but they're trying to take over that role, which I find deeply troubling.

 

Why do you ask ?

 

EVERYONE'S opinion matters in the USA. With a govt of ALL the people The AMERICAN people that is. And it's not a matter of "morality" for me. It's a matter of natural vs not natural. Truth vs BS.

 

Sure, but desiring isn't infringing. Get it ?

 

No weaseling on my part. ANd you ? Looks like now YOU are weasling. Irt was a question meant as a question - and you decided to turn it into a declaration. I don't allow words to put in my mouth. And no, I did not intend to make a statement. As for my question, you DODGED it.

I find nothing normal about the Muslim society. As for 1st world vs 3rd world, none of that s relevant to homosexuality, It is a mental aberration, and one that is defined as pathologically poorely (ex. "Pride" parades) in western society, as it is anywhere, if not worse.

 

If they are straight then does it make any sense for straight people to discriminate against people for being straight?

 

Homosexuality is neither normal nor common among humans or animals. In America, in the first large-scale government survey measuring Americans’ sexual orientation, the NHIS reported in July 2014 that 1.6 percent of Americans identify as gay or lesbian, and 0.7 percent identify as bisexual. This is hardly what you could call common. And animals are not a point of reference for what is or isn't normal. Thr true point of reference for that is nature itself, which is designed heterosexually, for both humans and animals.

https://www.bing.com/search?q=per+c...s=n&sk=&cvid=2c33f31a092b42f1b84569619fb6aa23

 

1. I said nothing about "discriminate"

2. In this forum, gays and their supporters have been at odds with straight people. That is what has occurred here. So ?

 

Assessing homosexuals as PRETENDING to be proud, as a way of covering up their shame, is being objective and truthful, not "narrow-minded", is not prudish in any way, and is not bigoted, period. If somebody told you it was, they gave you a wrong steer.

 

You guess WRONG. Just because animals (in very small numbers) engage in homosexuality, that doesn't mean a thing relative to it being natural. It is unnatural, just as many other things that both humans and animals (in small numbers) do.

The only thing that shows "natural" is acting as nature intended, as body parts are designed > for heterosexual sex, not homosexual.

 

Well yes and no. Parents in general have shirked that role. Are schools shouldn't be parenting our children or teaching them morals or anything that should be handled with the family.

 

Your "man" card is irrelevant to this thread. The OP is neither nasty, nor does it express "hate", as you call it. It merely points out that homosexuality, a contrary-to-nature mental aberration, is being FALSELY represented, by people pretending to have Pride, for the purpose of covering up their true feelings >Shame.

It is quite obvious that these are sick people, who are not being helped by you, et al, "standing with them" (whatever that means). By reinforcing their pathology, you're doing more harm to them than anything else

The political structure is not trying to change the definition of men and women, other than moronic decisions by the SCOTUS, such as concerning same sex marriage. I'm not changing anyone's life. I'm just clarifying hos things really are, as opposed to how they have come to be spun away from reality. Again, the gay pride paraders are simply attempting to cover up their shame. It is a cover-up event, not a pride event.

What is there to be proud of ?

 

I initially said that gay people have their parades because of the history of discrimination and hate against them for being gay. So now you admit that you said nothing about your examples of reverse discrimination. So what is your point exactly? How does "being at odds" with straight people opposed to gay rights equivalent to the horrific history of discrimination gays had to endure?

 

In the midst of whatever you're yammering about, I will again say (this is the last time), that in this forum, gays and their supporters, have been verbally attacking straight people. Ho hum. Yawn****

 

Verbally attacking someone else in a debate isn't the same as making laws and discriminating against someone for their sexual orientation and because of their sexual orientation. How do you know anyone here is gay? What if all the people attacking you here are all straight joes?

 

As I've said - if something doesn't affect me personally, nor causes outrage in the public arena, I don't GAF what anybody does. But be honest now - anal sex isn't 'normal' by any stretch of the imagination is it?? I'd actually be interested in your answer to that.

 

I don't see the pride parade causing outrage in the public Arena

Why would you GAF? It doesn't affect you personally and it causes just as much outrage in a public Arena as vaginal sex or oral sex.

Whether or not I think it's normal of course it is lots of people do it I could imagine 51% of the population doing it that makes it normal.

 

I don't waste my time replying to mischievous comparisons, verbal gymnastics, and blatant ambiguities intended to justify something which is wrong. That's my life code - something is either right, or it's wrong, and if I see it as wrong I won't hesitate to say so - as you well know by now? I think we're done here, don't you?

 

It isn't verbal gymnastics. You asked if I thought anal sex is normal. I answered that question directly. Don't get butt hurt because I don't share your opinion.

You didn't ask me if it was right or wrong you asked if I thought it was normal. Statistically speaking yes I think it is normal.

As far as right or wrong I don't think that question applies because it is arbitrary. I don't fault you for thinking it is wrong you have the right to think whatever you want.

if you want to be done you can simply stop responding to me.