Twitter User Hints at Murdering Trump Supporters

Can you cite those studies as well as their peer reviews? Or is this just more political gap widening rhetoric with no credibility? I tend to think it’s the latter.

 

have already done so - click on search

 

Rush isn't calling for violence, Silly!


President Trump SLAMS “Crazy Maxine Waters” – Her “Ranting and Raving” Will Make People Flee Democrats

 

Rush's comments during the Wilding incident were not benign. Years later when we all learned that it was the police who were the real criminals who deserved the electric chair he suddenly went silent.

 

I presume this, where you compare:

Ted Nugent-
"Our unholy rotten soulless criminal America destroying government killed 4 Americans in Banghazi. Period! What sort of chimpass punk would deny security, turn down 61 requests for security, then tell US forces to STAND DOWN when they were ready to kickass on the allapukes & save American lives! Obama & Clinton, thats who. They should be tried for treason & hung. Our entire fkdup gvt must be cleansed asap."

to

"Start killing maga before they kill you. Beat and maim them if they counter protest tomorrow. Its life and death now"

Need I really spell out the difference for you?

(hint: I added emphasis to Nugents quote to clarify, jic)

 

Are you hinting Obama was with a violent radical?

By any chance do you mean Bush who killed so many thousands of Americans and Iraqis?

 

Look over there, Squirrel!

 

funny how your hero made complaints about 4 dead at Benghazi but was silent here:


http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...benghazi-were-there-13-attacks-embassies-and/

 

Please cite the right supporting this.

 

I'd see Bush hung right along with em.

After due process of course.

Im guessing Nugent, like many conservatives, didn't 'wake up' to the reality of the RINOs until around the Tea Party movement.

Also, Nugent isn't 'my hero.' His rhetoric is in roughly a similar direction as my values, but he's no political icon afaic.

He's also not calling for instigatory violence or extrajudicial execution.

 

I was the first one on this forum to endorse Ben Ferencz's idea of a new Nuremberg Tribunal for that criminal. Still waiting for the ''moral integrity'' Republicans to do the same.

 

My rhetoric?

Man, we can't even compromise on keeping the country safe because people hate Trump so bad. He can't enact a travel ban very similar to Obama's (which you never heard the left OR right complain about) because it's racist. He can't deport illegals who broke the law because it's racist. He can't be given thumbs up for the lowest black unemployment in history, he can't be given props for the strong economy, etc. etc..

 

You guys are the absolute worst when it comes to psychological projection. So tell me where you've found common ground or willingness to compromise. I've seen a lot of your posts, and besides one saying ending AA in schools is a good idea, I haven't seen any. So please, let us know where you stand while you're over there pointing your finger.

 

How about just getting your lazy asses up and away from your computer for 20 minutes one day to vote?

 

Off topic. Make a thread out of it and watch how quickly you're debunked.

 

When have they held a rally asking people to go crowd up and push back on those that didn't share the same views?

 

Oh no **** that I’m not compromising with Satan lemmings I was referring to another poster.

 

https://nypost.com/2016/06/09/science-says-liberal-beliefs-are-linked-to-pyschotic-traits/

"A political-science journal that published an oft-cited study claiming conservatives were more likely to show traits associated with “psychoticism” now says it got it wrong. Very wrong.

The American Journal of Political Science published a correction this year saying that the 2012 paper has “an error” — and that liberal political beliefs, not conservative ones, are actually linked to psychoticism.

In the paper, psychoticism is associated with traits such as tough-mindedness, risk-taking, sensation-seeking, impulsivity and authoritarianism."

 

you advocated and supported the murderous violence in Charlotesville.

 

If you think that his rhetoric doesn’t lead to widening the political gap and in turn political violence then you are being intentionally ignorant. And you can bring up waters all you want. You’re not making a point. I denounce her. Will you not denounce those on your side the push otherhood and hate?

How can you expect to bridge any of those gaps when you can’t even come to the table and agree that intentionally creating political divides in the country, preaching otherhood, and in turn emboldening violent actions by the fringes of both sides should be condemned? How can we seek compromise and similarities in our goals when the first step has to be 100% agreement or I walk? I will give credit to Trump where it is due. Will you make any attempt to extend a hand to your fellow Americans who want to better the country, but disagree on the how?

I can’t imagine anyone here not voting. It seems we all, on both sides, have a strong vested interest in the fate of our government and the country as a whole.

I addressed this above.

 

Agreed. But I don't know where that 20 minutes comes from. I live in a town of 750 and it took me almost an hour to vote.

 

I rest my case.

 

Yes yes your favorite thing to do. Congrats on yet another case put to rest.

 

You tell me, that's exactly what I'm asking. The left refuses to work with Trump, it's either everything they want or they walk.

 

Really? I was in and out in like 5 minutes. I think I was the only person there when I arrived.