What an excellent post. Democrats are dedicated to immigration in order to replace the Black vote that they are overly dependent on. If they aren't well over 90+ percent of the Black vote with a high black turnout, they can't carry a national election. Look at the results of 2004, 2008, 2012, 2016. What they had in the middle two that they did not have on first and last election, was an extremely high Black Turnout with 95% of the Black vote, also being Democrat vote. Democrats are like the guy in a long term marriage with a wife who takes good care of him, who decides that what he really needs is a hot young girlfriend. He imagines that he can add her and keep the wife. That she will continue to cook and clean rather than tear the house down and take half his stuff as she walks out the door. Democrats continue in the midst of mass miscalculation.
most would be irate after spending the time and money to become Americans citizens and others cut in line and come illegally
Live the White American Dream ... but if you are not white enough, the wrong skin color, ethnicity or even illegal to live this dream, then you end up here:
This got my attention: "It’s a crystal-clear sign that the anti-Trump anger is concentrated within whiter, affluent suburban communities, not the Hispanic battlegrounds with the most at stake." Time to do some checking in the generic congressional vote, question 109 https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/9gtye70ttc/econTabReport.pdf Whites 37% democratic candidate 45% Republican candidate Blacks 71% Democratic candidate 7% Republican candidate Hispanic 52% Democratic candidate 27% Republican candidate Region Northeast 46% Democratic candidate 31% Republican Candidate Midwest 44% Democratic candidate 31% Republican Candidate South 40% Democratic candidate 42% Republican Candidate West 42% Democratic candidate 40% Republican candidate The south and west is what surprise me a bit. Party Democrats 91% Democratic candidate 3% Republican candidate Republicans 3% Democratic candidate 90% Republican candidate Independents 28% Democratic candidate 30% Republican candidate This last one shows independents aren't enthused as a whopping 42% either are not sure, undecided, don't care, voting other or aren't voting. Comparing this generic congressional poll to the one taken the day before the election in 2016 there isn't much difference except in two categories. Independents said they were voting for the Republican congressional candidate by a 42-28 margin in 2016 instead of 30-28 today. Then by region Midwest was 39-39 instead of 44-31 for the democratic congressional candidates. The south was 46-36 for the Republican congressional candidates instead of a narrow 42-40 advantage. The good news comes from the west for the GOP where back in 2016 it showed the democrats with a 45-36 advantage vs. a very small 42-40 advantage today. so we'll see, it is still very early,
Yeah that would confirm more support for Repubs by Hispanics. Which Trump will benefit off of that. This was the best part. Meanwhile, these results show that a critical mass of Hispanic voters are willing to prioritize other issues—like the growing economy—in choosing congressional candidates.....snip~
It was liberal Democratic asylum policies and open borders that allowed these Central Americans into our country who founded MS-13 in the MacArthur Park area of Los Angeles during the 1980's. At the same time just a few miles to the east, illegal aliens from Mexico established 18th Street Gang that is the largest Latino criminal gang in America today.
And yet people of all skin colors put them selves at great risk just to come here. Your message isn't working bro.
PC pajama girl Compton Councilwoman Yvonne Arceneaux confronts the real world she lives in: "Compton Councilwoman Yvonne Arceneaux said she was deeply troubled by the incident. "I'm floored," she said. "That's blatant to tell a family you can't live in this area because you are black. That's just shocking." Two decades ago, when Arceneaux joined the Compton City Council, she said that older blacks occupied the well-maintained, small homes in the neighborhood. But as they died or moved away, Latinos moved in. Although she noted cultural differences between blacks and Latinos, she said she thought they were minor." LOS ANGELES TIMES, Attack on family in Compton latest incident in wave of anti-black violence, A Latino gang is intimidating blacks into leaving the city that was once an African American enclave. It's part of a violent trend seen in other parts of the L.A. area., By Sam Quinones, Richard Winton and Joe Mozingo, January 25, 2013. http://articles.latimes.com/2013/jan/25/local/la-me-0126-compton-20130126
At least since 1990. "Since at least the mid-1990s, Latino street gangs across Los Angeles County have been targeting, beating and sometimes killing blacks in an attempt to drive them out of the region." THE SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER, "LATINO GANG LEADER CONVICTED IN L.A. ETHNIC CLEANSING CAMPAIGN, January 15, 2013. https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch...leader-convicted-la-ethnic-cleansing-campaign
Correct. The Collectivists (anti-Liberty left) need racism. They crave racism to the point that they will do everything to fan the flames including making claims of racism that don't exist, i.e. Ferguson, police violence, etc... i.e. the Collectivists. Martin Luther King, Jr. said: "I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character." This is anathema to Collectivists. Without racism the Collectivists lose votes. They must keep the flames of racism burning at all costs.
The racist left ignore it because they need racism to stay alive. They can't accept a multiracial environment because they'll lose votes if that happens.
As Bill Clinton said, "It's the economy stupid." I haven't seen anything to prove this, but my gut feeling. I think Hispanics that came here legally, went through the proper procedures of getting a passport, visa, background check, paid the fees and whatever else are taken aback or perhaps a little angry at those who came here illegally with the Democrats trying to reward the illegals at the expense of the legals. In other words they did it the right way and so too should everyone else. It's been kind of kept hush, hush, that feeling. But I think it's there.
I was stunned in San Jose, CA to see packs of Latino thugs running down Trump supportors like animals, taking them to the ground and beating them, while the police did nothing. Then I found out that the thugs were members of La Raza, the Police Brass were all members of La Raza, and had arrests been made and brought to court, the Judges are members of La Raza.
How can a member of a Latino Racial group called THE RACE, be a State or Federal Judge in the United States? The Left again when more of their horrible racist double standards.
La Raza = racist National Socialist thugs. It's not subtle. “‘Can’t they understand that that’s just the way Hitler started?’ A few months ago, a big foundation gave some money to a la raza group—they liked the outfit’s sense of pride,or something—and Cesar really told them off. He feels that racism will destroy our union faster, than anything else—that it plays right into the growers’hands if they can keep the minorities fighting, pitting one race against another, one group against another.” THE NEW YORKER, Profile: Cesar Chavez By Peter Matthiessen, 6/21, 6/28 1969. https://libraries.ucsd.edu/farmwork...ys/MillerArchive/032 Profile Cesar Chavez.pdf
That's right. And the illegal latino gang-bangers head straight for the latino neighborhoods and schools and take them over via violence, which, the authorities hesitate to stand against because the "progressives" will scream RACISM! And it's not just "hispanics" (a dumb category that includes Spain, but not Brazil.) Polls: Democrats Underperforming With Hispanics, Blacks, and White Male Milennials YouGov/Economist poll shows Trump's numbers improving with blacks. The numbers aren't great with blacks, of course. But the Democrat Party absolutely relies on 90%+ support from blacks for winning elections, and if it creeps below that, they're in trouble: Among African-Americans, 16 percent approve of Trump, double his election day support and 9 points higher than the black vote Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney received in 2012. The "Not Sure" at 10 percent is staggering in its upside potential. The same poll, with their rounding, reported in January that Trump approval was at 10 percent among black Americans, 15 percent were not sure, and 74 percent disapproved, so the numbers are not only steady but improving in Trump's favor. The Democrats also rely on Millennials, of course. And they're losing support with the big white male demographic of that age cohort: A Reuters/Ipsos mega poll of 16,000 respondents found that in the last two years, support for Democrats among millenials plunged from 55% to 46%. Even worse for Democrats, in the last two years, support from white millennial men has gone from the Democrats leading Republicans by 12% to the Republicans leading by 11%, a shocking 23% shift. Why would that happen? Well, strangely enough, some white male Millennials may have gotten the idea that the progressive/socialist/antifa coalition hates white males. They may have gotten this impression from the thousands of statements from the progressive/socialist/antifa coalition that they hate white males and wish to make them go away. But while the Democrats may be uninspiring to millennials as a whole, the party is actively alienating young, white men. Today's identity politics is impossible for millennials to avoid, whether they are confronted with it on campus or through clickbait comment pieces. In the identitarian worldview, 'white men' are responsible for all the world's woes -- the phrases 'white people' and 'white men' are practically shorthand for evil. Listicles reveal the '37 things white people need to stop ruining in 2018', magazines declare that 'white men must be stopped', while even respectable outlets like the Washington Post ask 'why can’t we hate white men?'. It turns out that white people are no more happy about being targeted as racial scapegoats and hate-objects than black were in the 50s. Who could have guessed? From the National Journal's Josh Kraushaar, about Democrats' failure to lock down the Hispanic vote at the levels they need. Democrats counting on President Trump’s hard-line immigration policies to spark energized Hispanic turnout and a wave against GOP candidates in this year’s midterms will be surprised to see what’s transpiring. Even during the heat of the family-separation crisis, Democrats are underperforming in heavily Hispanic constituencies, from GOP-held border battlegrounds in Texas to diversifying districts in Southern California to the nation’s most populous Senate battleground in Florida. Florida is offering an even bigger shock to the Democrats' system, given its perennial battleground status. In the state’s marquee race pitting Gov. Rick Scott against Sen. Bill Nelson, the governor's standing with Hispanic voters is keeping him competitive. It's almost like the Karl Rove crowd's autopsy of the Romney Loss that said, "You need Jeb! to love on the Hispanics to get you back into the WH!" was a steaming pile of self-serving bull **** or somethin'.
They ignored it because ONLY Whites are supposedly racist or bigoted or simply hate-filled and duplicitous. Ask any GOOD . . . leftist.
We had leftists freak out across this nation. There's no point in denying it. There's no point in trying to rewrite history. Youtube videos adequately captured the countless examples. It was funny as hell.
Really ...? I'd rather say that it's the sheer economic hardship and lack of alternatives from another country that keeps people moving illegally to the US ... But not this fairy tale of "American Dream" anymore