BREAKING Rosenstein has resigned

No, that's the purpose of the politburo of Joseph Stalin. In America, the crime typically has already occurred and the purpose of investigation is to find out indeed by whom.

 

The White House statement is a fake news source? Rosenstein did not go to the White House?

 

"Jumped the gun" = Fake News = MSM.

 

What exactly was "fake" about the White House statement?

 

The point is, the corrupt one will be gone. And the WH will finally oversee the entirety of this farce for what it is. I'd like it if the POTUS ordered a reimbursement of the 20 million dollars spent by Special Counsel.

 

I post this as a response to you, as you obviously get it, but I would hope everybody would get familiar with that concept.

From Richard Nixon's Article I impeachment

Subsequent thereto, Richard M. Nixon, using the powers of his high office, engaged personally and through his close subordinates and agents, in a course of conduct or plan designed to delay, impede, and obstruct the investigation

They never indicated if Nixon was successful or not (obviously not, as he was being impeached... Ha Ha) because IT DOESN'T MATTER!!

 

Redbait fail. And Americans don't have time machines. Investigations don't wait for a guilty verdict in order to retroactively be declared investigations. You are using a definition that exist only in your own personal lexicon. It has no bearing on actual US law.

 

The spirit guide for all future witch hunters:

"Give me a man and I will find the crime."[28], Andrey Vyshinsky, State Prosecutor, Josef Stalin’s Moscow Trials.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrey_Vyshinsky#cite_note-28

 

The investigation has already recovered $45 million in asset forfeitures

 

Whoever said anything about a guilty verdict? I'm saying investigators are called to a crime scene to investigate. The only known real crime(since 'Collusion' isn't generally a crime or even proven) was the Russian hacking, and to quote the fired fool: "No American has been charged in connection with the hacking."

So we would like to know what he's been doing, wasting our taxpayer dollars for. We're about to find out.

 

Was Nixon even charged with "obstruction of justice"?

 

With a case the IRS should've handled. My demand is to know what specifically enabled the Special Counsel. We're one step closer to finding out.

 

And NONE of them had to do with collusion or Trump. In fact the only one who committed a crime was Manafort and that was before Trump and it dealt with money crimes. This has been a farce from the very beginning. Rosenstein may call himself a Republican but he is really a democrat. He is part of the deep state and all of them must go and if they committed a crime they must be punished to the fullest extent of the law. I would say that trying to unseat a president deserves jail.

 

I have no idea. I did not call this event nor the press surrounding it fake.

 

Then much later, I think the article for Clintons impeachment was "used the office of the presidency to get laid and then lie about it to the american people".

Both are hilarious

 

Not quite true. Flynn, Papadopoulis, or however it is spelled.

 

An investigation is a legal inquiry. No, it doesn't just involve physical crime scenes.

 

IOW, the White House Statement was accurate, and the MSM "stories" are just more examples of Fake News.

 

Yes, those are other words. Not mine, but they are other words.

 

You guys just love that statement, but it seems (according to you) that all Russians said it (which is quite possible, and is why we are still distrustful of Russians to this day), but I believe most attribute it to Beria...



No Final Jeopardy for you, young man....

 

Probably worth it, if Rosey goes in with a wire....

 

He also said in the same interview that "As far as I’m concerned, I want that thing [the Russia investigation] to be absolutely done properly. When I did this now, I said I probably maybe will confuse people. Maybe I’ll expand that — you know, I’ll lengthen the time because it should be over with. It should — in my opinion, should’ve been over with a long time ago because it — all it is an excuse. But I said to myself I might even lengthen out the investigation. But I have to do the right thing for the American people. He’s the wrong man for that position."

So, it looks like there is some cherry picking going on here.

 

FFS bluesguy. We have covered this really ****ing retarded talking point - multiple times.

You are demanding that a prosecutor prove actual obstruction in order for obstruction of justice to apply. In essence, you are demanding that a prosecutor prove - beyond a reasonable doubt - that a conviction WOULD HAVE BEEN PROVEN - again, beyond a reasonable doubt - without the obstruction. It is really ****ing dumb.

But let me try to dumb it down for you further and put it some really concrete terms. If I have, in my possession, a video tape of a robbery and I decide to destroy that video tape because I do not want the police to convict the criminal, then I am guilty of obstruction of justice EVEN IF THE COPS ALREADY HAD A COPY OF THE TAPE.

 

Yes. Yours.