This is what the gun control law should be in the US.

Ok. Let me be more direct in my answer to you.

No unless they are prohibited persons.

Now answer mine

 

I want him to pull what you do and duck all your questions.

 

No what? You were not asked a question calling for yes or no. Duck again.

This is precisely what you ducked.

OK, using FBI crime sites, can you name who that is, committing the bulk of murders as a percent of their particular group?

Cite proof.

Let me help out.

Whites kill whites using guns a percent of the white population.
Blacks kill blacks using guns as a percent of the black population.

 

Based on your goal, no frigging way, you will be road blocked at every turn and words will be used against you at every turn.

Basically you just stated the total truth of your goals, that being regardless of compromise, it will never be enough, until you achieve your goal of total firearm banishment.

Therefore, like the rabid Anti-gunner you must be taken out of being seriously considered in any form.

 

Item 3.

 

That law is already in place.

 

Why are you running? Are you afraid to learn the truth? Its ok if you are

And I love that everyone can see it. LOL

 

Nope We need lots more laws

 

No clue what you are on about. LOL

 

Like you duck mine? LOL

 

Correct you are clueless.

 

Have a wonderful day!

 

Yes, it is nuts. First of all. define gun banner. Who is a gun banner according to you that is?

 

You can impeach him, currupt republicans let him off, then impeach him again. Keeping him from being able to nominate

 

You are literally, totally clueless about the impeachment process.

 

more then half of the house, 2/3rd of the senate

 

Anyone that favors restricting the legal access of even a single type of firearm by private citizens, and who justifies their position as being an attempt to keep firearms out of the hands of whatever group of prohibited individuals is convenient to cite for the greatest appeal to emotion. If not support for prohibiting the ownership of firearms directly, supporting a prohibition of ammunition or firearm-related accessories by private citizens is sufficient for qualification.

 

So that's your definition.

 

Which ain't happening.

 

Democrats will win the house. The house impeaches the senate convicts.
Ifthe republicans some how win the senate, then the democrat house can keep impeaching him forcing senate trials to block him from being able to nominate a justice.

 

Is there something wrong with the definition?

 

Where in the united states constitution is it specified that the house branch of congress can continually impeach the same individual multiple times?

 

Running away from the challenge I put to you, eh?

 

Where does it say they can't. It makes much more sense to bring up each article of impeachment separately to stall his appointments.

 

what challenge you keep coming up with stupid excuses as to why you can't compare X country to the US because of "culture" while dodging the basic premise that less access to guns make it harder to those who wish to shoot people to do so.