Sarah Sanders accused of sharing 'doctored' video to justify CNN ban

No, it has not been explained to me at all. All I know as fact is that the original undoctored record worked fine.....even here.

 

so BuzzFeed doesn't know what the hell they are talking about maybe you can write them have their vid experts fired and you can go work for them


This video analysis by BuzzFeed News demonstrates what the GIF conversion process does to video. While it's not technically "sped up" by intent, it effectively is in practice. The video-to-GIF conversion removes frames from the source material by reducing the frame rate. The GIF-making tool GIF Brewery, for example, typically reduces source video to 10 frames per second. Raw, televised video typically has a frame rate of 29.97 frames per second.
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/charliewarzel/acosta-video-trump-cnn-aide-sarah-sanders

 

it wont on twitter
it works here because you can hotlink vids from YouTube which runs higher quality vids
now I want you to make a recording straight from a TV source and then try to embed that format here with out reformatting it

 

On second thought, this is even more ignorant of the way graphic formats work. Say if one wants to convert a 30 fps video to a 10 fps video, in a GIF format, the time between frames change, not the number of frames. The result would be a slower video.

I wonder what algorithm they would use to evenly divide 29.97 by 10 and get a whole number?

This whole tomfoolery reminds me of those cop shows, where they can zoom into digital images, and see things, that in real life, they could never see. It only works because of widespread technical illiteracy.

 

Huh.....good luck getting me to do that....or even explaining to me how to do it. Basic fact is.......a fake news video was promulgated by the White House, which is desperate to show that Ocosta was the bad guy, when he clearly was not....on either version of the video. Huckabee is a snake oil salesman straight out of the Donald Trump School of Excellence in Bullshit.......like...."there is an invasion on the way" or similar. Invasion, my arse. But "Sir," bleats Donald, "We have a difference of opinion on what an invasion is." Yeas......just like facts can be 'alternative.' "But Sir," bleats Donald, "The mid-terms were a decisive win for us, even though we lost control of half of the heart of Government." Come on...the bloke is an international embarrassment to the US. I admire your passion in defending your POTUS, but at some time, reality has to click in and there will be a realisation that turd polishing just does not work. Fair dinkum...is he really the best the GOP has to offer the Planet or for some bizarre reason has GOP and the USA decided to give the ships bilges, the slime at the bottom of the barrell, a go.

 

Yes, who ever wrote this is not on the ball. I've never used GIF brewery, never even heard of it. But then I do use professional software.

When my son was around 13-14 years old, we watched a show on FOX. The television network, not the propaganda channel. The show was about ghosts. In the show they showed video clips of supposed aberrations. By the end of the show, my son told me, I know how they did that. But it was getting late, so I went to bed. The next morning, my son was all excited when I awoke. He led me to the living room, where he showed me a video. It was of a video of a ghost taking a tour of my house. It even flew over me as I slept, and did a little dance. Not longer after that, he produced a video of a flying tea kettle. It even had mounted machine guns that it fired in a fine display.

 

so much ignorance I don't even know were to start with you

no the vid wouldn't run slower the amount of time each frame appears would be longer less frames but longer duration per frame its why GIF take up much less bandwidth less frames that required to be uploaded/downloaded and stored

If you have a vid that is 1 sec long and you use a format that records at 10 fps sec that then would mean each frame would appear for 0.1sec
now if you use a format that is 30 fps sec each frame would appear for 0.03 sec
neither format would run faster or slower both would still be 1 sec long just the one with 30 fps would be a better quality it wont be choppy less stutter

look I'm not going to continue to waste my time trying to teach the ignorant this is a political forum not a free education site so learn something then you can come back and debate me when I don't have to keep teaching you the basics
and by the way I'm just an amateur with computer programing and I know more then you when you claim your an expert with so many years if experience

 

So why the need for a second source if it shows the exact same thing?

 

Why are you trying to twist around what you don't know about, to defend a clearly altered video, and the false narrartive that goes with it?

If one watched the entire 90 minutes or so, of Trump going off the rails, putting on display for all the world to see, his ignorance, his rudeness, his bullyness, the fact that he is an a**hole. But no, conservatives only saw a little itty bit of an altered video, and suddenly they are all enraged with a false narrative.

The story, outside of conservatives circles, around the world, is what the heck is wrong with those tRump supporters? Here we can easily see two videos. One has been altered, the other hasn't been. All the world see the unaltered version. The tRump supporters, even when faced with the fact that the video they have been being shown, has been altered, and even after having acknowledged that the video has been altered, they stand by the altered version and reject the original.

Do you know who I feel like? Ever see Monty Python's Holy Grail. There is the scene with the witch and duck. And the knight was leading the peasants, on their logic. And the other knight was looking on, smirking.

 

Why do you keep defending a video you know to be altered. When you go to the tire store, do you insist they put altered tires on your car?

Help me understand. Do you not care about the truth? Is anything, no matter how deceptive, okay to you if it satisfies your ideological narrative? What is it like, going through life, pretending things are other than they are?

Again, why do you defend a video you know to be wrong?

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
.

Her actions were those of a freak, but I guess rudeness, grabbing things from others like a gorilla, trying to shut people up, and making a scene in the wrong venue is just normal to righties...so it wouldn't be seen as freakish..... Just their normal behavior

NO, that's the exact right venue to make a scene showing the President has to hide and have his staff grab mics rather than answer questions.

Uh, ya , right..you think people in the White House have to obey rules...unless it's the President and his family and they don't even have to obey the law...





Your doesn't refute a word of my post....

AND according to your righty pals you are sexist for calling Acosta a freak...did you know that?

 

because it wasn't intentionally altered it was done so to be able to share it on sites like twitter
and no matter if the vid is run at 10 fps or 30 fps sec it doesn't change that fact the undeniable hard fact that Acosta put his hands on a female staffer
he intentionally lowed his hand onto her arm with force enough force to make her bend her arm all in a attempt to keep her from retrieving the Mic a Mic that didn't belong to him a Mic he was told to pass along

all this vid doctoring crap is nothing but a lame attempt to distract from those facts Acosta's inexcusable childish petulant actions putting his hands on a female staffer doing her job so to keep from turning over the mic he was told to give up

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
WHERE and WHEN did Accosta "bully" the freak who tried to take away his microphone???

Trumpers seem to always get it backwards...SHE tried to BULLY HIM by taking away his mic !!!


Same in this thread ,too....no answers so nit-pic away....it was HIS mic, HE was holding it...


Her actions were those of a freak, but I guess rudeness, grabbing things from others like a gorilla, trying to shut people up, and making a scene in the wrong venue is just normal to righties...so it wouldn't be seen as freakish..... Just their normal behavior

Now find something serious to post …

No, I don't blame Accosta !

Where you got that second sentence is a real mystery..WTF has your belief on rape got to do with my post ??!!!

Sheesh , are you accusing Acosta of rape now because he touched her arm ?? WHAT!!!

 

so I will ask
if you lend me your phone for me to make a call and after I'm finished you ask for it back and I refuse so you reach in to grab your phone and I swipe you hand away you are the aggressor you are in the wrong ? and I should be allowed to keep your phone till I decide to give it back?

 

Twitter has long banned the account of breibart

All this is about is cry baby Trump kicking out reporters who want to ask questions that Trump doesn't want to hear. That narcist can not stand any
criticism. That lady came up to him, and she was the one forcing that kind reporter to do things... and all he did was free speech. How about not to push that under the rug. It's the freaking cornerstone of a democratic country to investigate and question your own leaders of their shameful actions. To deny this, is just becoming a totalitarian state.

That vid doctoring was done by the breibart... that's right wing fake news. And they did it, to make the people believe Acosta is a violent person. The White House grabbed this fake news with both hands and feeds the crowed in order to get more approval of Trump censuring the news. And Trump aint firing those people who spread fake news for him.

No doubt that when questioning Trump why the WH is spreading doctored video's to make Acosta look violent, he will kick out that reporter too.

 

Complete lie from the fake news left.

The video was not doctored

 

It was not doctored.

They simply zoomed in which is not doctoring it.

 

this post is filled with so much lies
first I will start off by correcting your first lie
Breitbart hadn't a dam thing to do with it and here is Breitbart twitter account
https://twitter.com/BreitbartNews
sure in hell doesn't look banned to me
I'm not going to even waste my time to correct the rest of the lies
so get informed then come back and we might discuss it

 

Google "the 4th estate". Acosta, part of the elite White House press corps. He is one of the most powerful men in America.

With total indifference, Acosta pushed aside and shamed an the intern, a powerless young female, trying to follow the routine of her job.
Will he be punished for his low down illegal brutish behavior, or is he above the law?

 

It's very clear what happened. Acosta did not follow the rules, pushed a female intern, and had his hard pass revoked as a result of his actions. CNN was not banned but the particular reporter was. That is an accurate description of what occurred. And those who truly seek the truth have no trouble understanding what occurred.

 

Plus CNN was not banned. They can send another reporter. This is vastly different from the attempt by the Obama WH to ban Fox News from the WH press conferences.

 

There was no video doctoring and no free speech.

Free speech is not the right to claim control of another person's microphone.

 

It was not altered. That is fact you are simply being dishonest about.

 

And Acosta is still as free as any other American to express himself and criticize the president.

 

From what I've read it could have happened in a changing of format.......without intent.