Hillary Must Answer Key Email Questions, Federal Judge Orders

There are plenty of opinions about the topics and issues or even unanswered questions but there is a dirty of facts to "lock her up" at least not presented.
If she knowingly lied under hense comming perjury she would have been indicted. Was she?

Trumpmorvany other high ranking official being brought up is very valid as a case of comparison.

Neither Trump nor Hillary are above the law and if either one thinks he/she is they need to be reminded of our laws.

 

AMERICA’S NEW PAPER OF RECORD:

‘We Would Be Delighted To Have Hillary Clinton Run In 2020,’ Says Democratic Party Chair As Several Laser Dots Dance Around On Forehead.

 

Yes. We do, supposedly, live in a republic. That is why deciding the most powerful position in a our government, our Presidency, via an Electoral College vote (i.e. governing by representation ~ or democracy https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/democracy), is a bad fit for a true republic (where the people, and only the people, choose their representatives).

Anyway, more voting Americans wanted Hillary and instead we got Drumpf. And you guys still want to, "lock her up," after all these years and empty investigations. Pitiful!

 

I'm not nearly as old as you apparently are and, for me, going back to Nixon is a real stretch. But there you have it.

Oh, and if you're counting, there has been only ONE time in the past 7 (SEVEN) Presidential elections where a Republican candidate was able to win the popular vote. Obstructing justice, collapsing the economy into a pool of debt while granting tax breaks for the wealthy, and declaring wars under false pretenses seems to be a Republican Presidential Mainstay (save for Ronald Reagan, the very bestest President of ALL TIME!!!). So where are we now?

 

Well at least you are good looking, go have a drink?

 

Who cares? That show is old and boring! Everyone these days is staying tuned for the next episode of the Donald Trump Show. It's full of: angry insults, sexual promiscuity, indictments and convictions, denials, betrayals, and more! Hah!

 

If I don't care about grammar while posting and I correct papers for a living, why should you? Nevertheless, please ensure your own grammar is perfect while condemning the mistakes of others. Otherwise, some wise-guy like myself will point out your own errors and your post will end up looking foolish.

 

So what grade did you give her? Any credit for being cute?

 

I hear the air time for this is really disappointing and the ratings are in the dump ~ save for the few angry Trump-Zombies left in the Congressional wing for a few more days. Rumor has it that show's being cancelled come January. And about time, too. They've been airing nothing but re-runs for the past several years.

 

I don't care much about grammar either, Stuart. It was a jab which, apparently, only disturbed you. And my did you spend a lot of time on it. lol! The rest was pretty much my own made up language which even you were able to, I think, pretty much comprehend, N'est pas? Anyway, God help us if your really do correct papers for a living. Your criticism for most of my strategically and grammatically correctly placed commas won't pass the test. See you in the Dean's office, Stuart!

 

I always tell kids who try that to get their own teaching credential. In any event, it's the weekend and my district has a week off for Thanksgiving, so I'll grade it during my prep period on November 26th. Also, no one gets points for being cute and we don't know that she looks like her avatar anyway. That's on top of the fact that I come here and deliberately make grammatical mistakes while posting - split infinitives are my favorites - just because I have to be perfect at work.

 

Nah, I'm not disturbed. I do it for a living - if it disturbed me I'd go into another line of work. I like what I do.

Well, yeah. I mean, c'mon - you made a lot of mistakes. But I type pretty fast - only way to survive school - so it took barely a minute. Not much time at all.

That does explain much.

 

The Dems will screw themselves royally if they let Hillary or Warren or SOcialist Sanders run.

 

A fast typist, eh? How are you at making coffee? lol!

You do understand that nothing you are saying here like, "I don't care about grammar while posting," only adds credence to the fact that your corrections for my grammar are seriously flawed. Right? Have a good night Stuart!

 

Not the first time I was c**k blocked...lol

 

Good question. I have not heard of a single instance where the NSA prevented something or provided evidence of a crime. Not saying the stories aren't out there, but I am saying those stories don't make it into the news that I watch.

 

You think the Octogenarians can stop them? They've fostered this mindset for a generation, what the hell did they think was going to happen once these folks gained enough age to join the process?

Pelosi may need GOP help to get the Speakership, and if she needs it, Trump is signalling that we will give it to her.

 

I don't care - until someone else starts caring. And even then I don't care - until it turns out that their OWN grammar is as bad or worse than the post that triggered them. That's when pointing out their mistakes becomes funny, and funny is good. And - it isn't helping your argument that you say my corrections are flawed without stating why. Hey, I listed exactly why I noted each error. Take issue with each reason why.

To be blunt, you have no argument - you're just arguing. That's boring, and boring is bad.

 

Indeedy do:

 

You have yet to address my stated views on this thread, choosing instead to post lengthy off-topic diatribes criticizing my grammar, and now you say I’m the one who’s, “BORING”??? Maybe you should lay off the stupid pills?

I’ll tell you what’s almost as boring as your off-topic insults, Stuart: the GOP nutcases who are hooked on their long-standing infatuation with Hillary Clinton. One which has never been fruitful for them. You know what they say about repeating the same action over and over without ever achieving the desired results...

So what do you have to say in response to THAT, Stuart? Can you muster up an on topic response for me? It would be a first for you.

 

That happens when you go on a tangent about something else. Then being wrong or not in the knowing of reality.

You shouldn't bring something off topic, thinking no one would correct, your not knowing or error.

 

How does that absolve of failing to comply with subpoenas or perjury?

No one thinks Trump is above the Law. That's just your deflection. Furthermore if Trump pulled what Hillary did. You and the leftness would already have him doing time.

 

Right now.....we are at a point in time wherein the Leftness wants Trump hooked up for anything and everything. They even blame him for **** Demos pulled.

 

And if she contradicts previous responses given to the Congress.........................

 

And he should add did the Office of Legal Counsel and State Department Cybersecurity approve of her use and clear it for use.