Halbig's Sandy HooK FOIA Request Questions Stonewalled at Hearing !

The Fake Media does its mission of disinformation primarily by what they omit, by intonation and cadence of speech, by facial expression, by word choice, and by women infobabes being emotional and scolding both while reporting in the field and behind the anchor desk.

I don't believe it is possible for them to make up and execute a story as big as Sandy Hook, at least not yet.

 

You bring up a good point, but you and I both have failed to mention that for the most part, mainstream media dutifully repeats what it has been told. Often it cites "anonymous sources" here and there as a cover. The media never asks pointed questions, never demands proof from its government handlers.

I don't know if you happened to catch the initial media coverage of the MH17 incident in 2014, but that was a perfect example. All sorts of assertions and claims, all from anonymous sources in the Pentagon and State Department, but no proof whatsoever.

So with SH, they did not mention the existence of a FEMA exercise, because nobody told them to. They did not know the school had not been used in years because no authority figure told them. They did not mention the unusual circumstances of numerous real estate transfers because nobody told them to.

Theirs is not to wonder why, theirs is but to do and don't ask questions.

So to be clear, I am not claiming they media made up SH or San Bernardino. I'm saying only the media says what it's told to say, shows what it's told to show. They are compromised by their obsequious nature.

 

"Who" or "What" tells "the media" to say "what it's told to say, shows what it's told to show." This is conspiracy theory without proof.

 

That you are unaware of the proof DOES NOT MEAN that proof doesn't exist. Udo Ulfkotte explained how it works in Europe, and ended up dead.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Udo_Ulfkotte

 

Ah, conspiracy theorist. Who is threatening journalists here? No, 'lack of proof' is not proof that proof exists. Think hard about this.

 

... are we getting to your good sources now? ...

 

Eleuthera, please: the good sources now.

 

Have you ever considered doing your own thinking? Or do you prefer to be led by the nose by the authorities?

 

I prefer you to be professional and not amateur, Eleuthera. What other sources are you using? Or you are admitting you rely on Fake Alt Right Media, the fake news.

 

Have you ever considered answering questions regarding the false tripe that you post? ...

 

Are you capable of independent analysis and thinking, or do you prefer government and media propagandists to do your thinking for you?

 

You have been asked clear and intelligent question, Eleuthera, but no you don't answer them when you don't like the factual answers, I believe.

 

just answer my questions ... thanks ...

 

The factual answers, the facts themselves, NOT covered by the mainstream media, make it clear that the official narrative is false and contrived. Its goal was a predicate act for federal gun control, which ultimately failed.

 

If you could formulate an intelligent question, I would be happy to.

I have no obligation to engage with poor questions intended to distract. Let's get adult, eh?

 

quit playing games E ... my questions were very clear ...

you stated that your proof of a staged event was "All participants must check in" ... where did you get the word "participants"? ...

Is that question too difficult for you to understand? ... if not, then tell me why ... I would be more than happy to rephrase it if you like ...

 

Eleuthera will not answer questions if the facts undermine his conspiracy theories.

If E keeps it up, perhaps it is time to put E in time out for awhile.

 

My bad, if that is your big complaint. Everybody v. All participants, big deal.

The point is the portable sign was there, along with a certain number of portable toilets, showing that the event at the school was NOT spontaneous, it was planned in accordance with FEMA procedures. What happened at SH was a hoax brought under cover of a training exercise.

 

No, E, there was no hoax except the one your brain is playing on you. It was not a training exercise of any sort.

 

Living in denial is simply how many, perhaps most, US spend their time Jake.

The cover-up is worse than the crime.

 

Yes, E, you are living in denial.

If you were summoned to jury duty and asked about Sandy Hoax, you would be dismissed by the judge and the Prosecutor and the Defense Counsel as one who is captured by conspiracy theories.

 

Duh, the judiciary is as corrupt as the other 2 branches. There are a few good men in the judiciary, but they are just very hard to see in action.

 

Thank you for proving my point. No good man or woman calls Sandy Hook a hoax.

 

that sign was not seen at the site until Dec 18th ... four days after the shooting ... unless you have evidence otherwise ...

 

So the government presence was spotted at Sandy Hook four days after the shootings.