That is the first I heard of 16 being the age a girl can get pregnant. Pedophelia in the USA is defined as sex with children not able to get pregnant. Why must you lie and say I defended pedophelia? I am saying this is not actually that crime. I am not clear it is rape. I am not up to date on Argentina's laws. Why didn't you educate us all on their laws and not your laws?
At the very least it's molestation, so it's pretty much the same equivalent thing. There is no way an 11-year-old girl would want to have sex with her grandma's 65-year-old boyfriend. I understand what you're saying, and overall agree with you, but that's almost certainly not the case here. She was slashing her wrists so I'm pretty sure it wasn't a happy experience.
I did not know about the slashing of wrists. The child in my view was double or triple abused. The friend of her grandma abused her, then the twisted mess among the adults and then by their government. I am not clear why the Australian woman brought it to us though. It belongs on a site of South Americans.
What part of “age of consent” is difficult? And you are wrong about paedophilia laws https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_sexual_abuse_laws_in_the_United_States
I damned sure don't tolerate this inflicted on children. But why are you not upset it happened to her?
I wonder what type of music pro-choicers would have decided to play for the fetus while they were aborting her. After all, it was RAPE so she has to have an abortion!
Boy you have to explain that to this forum. I follow American laws. Do you follow Argentinian laws in your country? Clearly this child legally under their law is not able to consent. I read up on it once you hurled it out to inflame this forum.
More information https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/01/world/americas/11-year-old-argentina-rape-abortion.html Is anyone HAPPY with them lying to this young girl?
Do you have a problem with this? You do what the woman to be informed, don't you? To hear from both sides. So what? What's wrong with that? It's the baby's body that was being affected, not hers. What that medication actually is is a hormone that makes the fetus's lungs develop sooner, so it will be able to breathe on its own if it comes out prematurely, which it seems they were foreseeing.
You're describing late term, whereas had she had a procedure in a timely manner, the fetus would have been about the size of a small Lego and non-viable. But you go ahead and pretend to be an expert, even though you're not.
Maybe this one: Can he see or is he blind? Can he walk at all Or if he moves will he fall? Is he live or dead? Has he thoughts within his head? We'll just pass him there Why should we even care? ♪ ♫ Nobody wants him ♫ ♬
Can you see how that just might be more f**ked up than making an 11-year-old rape victim give birth via c-section if she didn't have her pregnancy terminated soon enough?
It should have never gotten this far. The government should have just let her get an abortion right away instead of lying to her
FoxHastings said: ↑ Good lord, I don't click on your links.... and it's a fact, a 19 week fetus is still a fetus.....it has to be born to be a baby....as you have been told a thousand times... Can you show EXACTLY where in the post of mine you quoted that I said I """ support in vitro murder right up to the last moment before birth""" There was NOTHING in my statement to indicate that but twisting words because they have no facts is so typical of Anti-Choicers