"Trump says there should be no Mueller report"

"President Donald Trump said Friday that “there should be no” report from special counsel Robert Mueller on his Russia investigation."

"His comments come a day after the House unanimously passed a symbolic resolution calling for public release of the report Mueller gives to the Justice Department about his probe. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., tried to bring the measure up in his chamber on Thursday, but Trump ally Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., blocked it."

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/03/15/tru...be-no-robert-mueller-russia-probe-report.html

Now would an individual who for two years straight has been telling anyone who will listen that he is totally innocent of anything today want to ban the very evidence that according to his logic will prove he is innocent?

Why would his house Senator Graham go out of his way to insure that the very vehicle proving Trump innocent be kept from public view?

Doesn't seem to make sense, unless ...............

 

Lol sounds like he’s not as confident as our PF trumpeters claim to be!

 

They are both still trying to base their complaint on the notion that the Steele Dossier started the investigation, even though we now know that's a lie.

 

Not the "deep state" again?

 

Talk about taking something out of context. This is about as bad as it gets when the left wing Trump hating media tries to make him look bad. They know full well their low IQ, low information followers will only read the headline and believe it.

Total Liberal Dishonesty. It's a disgrace.

 

Graham typically doesn't go full deep-state and has in some ways defending the investigation, but in one of his latest speeches he was selling his complaints based on the notion that the Steele Dossier began the investigation. Like I said, though, we now know it didn't.

 

I read the original tweet. I read the headline. What are you trying to claim is out of context about it?

 

That would be because there shouldn't be a Mueller investigation in the first place.

 

What started it.

 

Papadopoulos.

 

Russia meddling to help trump while his campaign was filled with criminals who had Russian ties.

 

Really, then you tell us why Trump, who has endlessly said he is innocent, now want to keep hidden the very proof of that which would prove he is innocent

 

Ah, the "deep state" again, now what will it be this time, Emails between two lovers or a dossier that didn't even enter the picture till after the fact?

And the irony is that if Trump is as innocent as he says he is regardless of how it started he should be anxious to use it to show the American public that he is innocent

 

Why are you talking about FAUX News viewers?

Anyway, Trump is a Complete MORON and he knows the Mueller Report will eviscerate him (and his Crime Family).

 

The headline should have been "There never should have been an investigation to begin with," or 'This should never happen to a president again," or "Corruption within the FBI and DOJ is the reason why Mueller exists."

There could have been any number of more legit headlines, but the one chosen for this story is the one phrase the hateful left wing media could quote that low IQ people would assume points to some sort of guilt or whatever it is low IQ people think.

 

There very definitely should be a complete, word-for-word, unredacted, unedited release of the Mueller Investigation report to EVERYONE! I would completely disagree with anyone, including President Trump, if he said otherwise -- and I'm a rock-solid, right-wing Conservative!

 

Lol, anything other than slavish Trump praise is a lie, even if you are directly quoting him. Hilarious.

 

A tRUMPster in the thread is thinking there are lower information voters than a tRUMPster?
Hilarious.
The uneducated is tRUMPs base.

 

Baloney.

The dossier was a finished product when Ohr began telling everyone it wasn't something that could be used as evidence in July 2016.

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-h...arned-steele-dossier-was-connected-to-clinton

Papadopoulous met with Mifsud, at the end of April.

He had no ties to Russians, and was never charged with working with or for Russians, so there goes your theory.

https://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/4...-told-fbi-about-trump-russia-and-papadopoulos

Documents I obtained from sources show Mifsud told the FBI in February 2017 that his contacts with Papadopoulos a year earlier, during the 2016 presidential campaign, were mostly innocuous. He made that point both in an FBI interview and a follow-up email to agents.

He described the contacts as an academic exercise in pursuit of peace, not a global plot to hijack the election. And he went out of his way to say there was no talk of sinister cybersecurity intentions such as a plot to hack Hillary Clinton’s emails.

“I reaffirm that the content of our conversations was always on wide geo-strategic issues,” he wrote FBI agents on Feb. 11, in an email that was quickly sent to the very top of the FBI’s counterintelligence division. Mifsud sent the email just hours after agents interviewed him.

He said the conversations mostly centered around “how the Trump then-campaign team looked to develop a conversation on Europe/UK … and with Russia” and “the fallout in policy in the deteriorating relationship between the major countries in the world today.”

 

Yes. The Deep State is a known fact.

Elements of the government opened an investigation into something without any proof, and opened the Mueller investigation after they knew there was no evidence of a crime.

What would you like to call it?

 

Yeah that $8k in Google and Facebook ads created a lot of havoc.

 

"The FBI had known for months — at least since July 2016, when an Australian diplomat reported it — that Papadopoulos boasted about the Russian dirt on Clinton" Papadopoulos got off easy because he was cooperating. He, and by extension the campaign, had advanced knowledge of the hacked emails and Russia's involvement. And the campaign was being contacted about it. It would have been a huge dereliction of duty for the FBI to not investigate that.

 

Oh I see, so they started the dossier at the end of April and Ohr had it in his hands in July.

Papadopoulos committed no crime, and Mifsud said so, according to the article I just linked you.

He didn't have knowledge of a damn thing, which is why he wasn't charged with a crime.

 

Of course! How the hell do you think he got so many donks to crossover and have him win traditionally blue states like MI, and WI?

 

Calling anti trumpers low information is giving them way too much credit.