actually some Muslims wont give people rides in cabs if they have beer in their grocery bags, I do not approve of that anymore then Christians that do these terrible things the problem is, anti-gay Christians are not allowing them to be handed out even by others, they think if they allow others to do it that it also violates their religion.. I say if as a Christian or a Muslim you can not do the job, get another job
Unless you belong to the dregs of humanity...in which case...you get the country you live in to make changes to suit you....dont assimilate...just moan and groan like islamic scum until the laws are changed...then you introduce sharia law officially, even though it exists under the surface......all part of the worldwide caliphate demanded by islam......
yep as kim davis found out "Kim Davis, Who Refused to Issue Same-Sex Marriage Licenses, Loses Kentucky County Clerk Seat" http://time.com/5446954/kim-davis-loses-election/ "Kim Davis, the Kentucky county clerk who was jailed in 2015 for declining to grant same-sex marriage licenses, lost her bid for re-election Tuesday." I say they should do a job they are able to do... not one they can't do because of their religion
I’ll bet some of your countrymen might want some guns... and you might want one when those ‘Islamic scum’ you seem to dislike begin their operations.
Our incompetent politicians will ensure that the dregs of humanity are looked after.... that applies to Australia and the rest of the world....Hungary seems to be the only place on the planet where the politicians have the balls to confront islam head on....
You sure showed me. Nope. They were defeated by sheer numbers of Russia, US, UK, France and Italy. You're naming countries where the white people were genocidal against the original inhabitants. "superior"... "culture", sure. That has nothing to do with my claim they were not there to help the original inhabitants with developing their own economy, education and form of government. So far you haven't made an argument that the Ottoman empire was not an advanced civilisation. So far you have not made an argument the west helped Mozambique with developing their economy, education etc. History is clear that this is true. They took their aircraft carriers to the US, and bombed them. I blows my mind that you doubt they were advanced, unless you really do see non white people as inferior. The US pumped in something like 3 trillion bucks to occupy them countries, and they failed to stabilize it.... even with the help of much of the west. The US is only strong enough to win from an army. It's like a weak helpless baby in controlling what they took. They fled out of Afghanistan, just like they did in Iraq,... like they did in Vietnam. All them babies they killed there with all them bombs they threw at them.... the only result is that they created 100.000s of weak ptsd drug addicted deviants, for participating in that genocidal campaign. ^^ only 1 day a year, buddy, do you get appreciation.
] I hope so. Their legacy is a footstool, and nothing more. That's one way to look at it, but they disappeared, that's certain. The aborigines of these countries were culturally inferior and lacked the sophisticated weaponry and numbers of the invading countries. The strong overcome the weak. This has happened throughout history, and Islam in the Middle East is an example. I don't have to. There has been nothing of substance to come out of it. How can I prove a negative? The Portuguese were not good colonialists while the people of Mozambique were largely unschooled and subject t left wing political regimes. It will take a couple of generations, and a lot of luck, to bring them into the modern world. I can't see the original post. They were certainly advanced enough to defeat Russia in an earlier war but attacking a more powerful nation does mean it's advanced culturally or politically. The US, as explained, turned that around after the war. And what does that say about Arabs/Muslims? All that money spent and lives lost and they still can't live in peace or gain an education. The Middle East will 'unstable' into the foreseeable future until the people get a modern education and break free from the ignorance Islam breeds. And yes, Afghanistan isn't worth spit. And the US, despite the political and humanitarian failure of Vietnam, eventually won the Cold War.
You can find their legacy in a museum. Nothing you brought up disputed how advanced the Ottoman empire actually was. Something you can't dispute. And previously you asked "How did they manage to oppress tthe entire world when theyy were seriously outnumbered? What 'puppet regimes' are you referring to?"... apparently you picked up a history book. Your claim of "Those 'colonized' areas of the world tend to do better than the others"... remains a total joke. The western invaders did not help out the original inhabitants economy, their education, etc. They slaved them around to drain their resources. I said how many universities the west build in 500 years of occupation in Mozambique, and how many the locals build in the next 50 years... proving me I am right. You can look at how it went down in Ghana. Be my quest. Total nonsense that you got some negative to prove. Well. Go look at Ghana that wasn't part of Portugal. Doesn't mean squat that it wasn't advanced. The US did not add anything to their society, after their genocidal campaign. Last time I checked, the US is up and down invading and bombing all those countries there, making sure it's all terrible unstable. Iraq, Syria, Israel, Yemen, Afghanistan.. it's always the US that helps out to commit the most horrific genocidal wars, go for regime changes. Iran having a democracy that nationalizes their natural resource... can't have that... so the Arians and Jews made a coup against it, to than supply nerve agents to massacre the civilian population. That is being "advanced" and "civilized". Oh why don't you go to the Crimea and explain it over there.
Yes, there will be relics dating from that period. In fact it was the Europeans who were often seriously outnumbered yet still managed to win wars through better strategies and weaponry. This was certainly true In Latin America, India, and other ares of the world. Who built and financed these universities? How many existed before the Europeans arrived? If you refer to a country or region we can stick to that. Hh? They created a modern democracy in Japan. What "genocide" are you referring to? Where were you educated? Okay, that makes it more clear. You don't understand what 'genocide ' means. Yeah, I'll be sure do that.
That is the period I'm discussing, right before it took Russia, UK, US, France and Italy to stop that. And what they did, is cut it all up,... and drain the lands under slave like conditions. Typical white Christian/Jewish behavior. And there,.. what they did is drain the natural resources under slave like conditions. None of these qualify your "Those 'colonized' areas of the world tend to do better than the others" You claimed "Those 'colonized' areas of the world tend to do better than the others". And I proved you wrong. "Those 'colonized' areas of the world tend to do better than the others" is your burden of proof. And you're failing horrible. So what. About 56% of the people allowed to vote, actually votes in the US,.. last presidential campaign. Trump hardly had an overal majority from those people who voted. So like around 25% who could vote, voted on Trump. About 25% of the people is too young to vote. So the % of the American citizens who actually voted on Trump ... below 20%, buddy. "democracy" "majority rule" lol. And it says nothing how advanced a country is. Japan was just fine. fire bombing to even nuclear bombing cities full of civilians. That is genocidal. You aware the US even build a Japanese town in the US. to test their bombs, and find out what the best way it is to burn them alive?
The only way you can win a war is to annihilate the other side. WW2 was the last one we were allowed to win.