Are no democrats smart enough too...

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by Mike12, May 12, 2019.

  1. Mike12

    Mike12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2012
    Messages:
    4,563
    Likes Received:
    2,891
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Barr made the conclusion that there wasn’t obstruction. The report is irrelevant, barr himself concluded this and so DOJ concluded it. Ignoring facts like this is not helping your case.
     
  2. JakeStarkey

    JakeStarkey Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2016
    Messages:
    25,747
    Likes Received:
    9,526
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Barr concluded nothing of the sort, Mike12. Unless you can prove it, your post is irrelevant.
     
  3. Mike12

    Mike12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2012
    Messages:
    4,563
    Likes Received:
    2,891
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No, stuart provided evidence of me trashing republicans and claiming we need to vote democrat etc.. etc..

    You have provided no evidence to back up your claim. It was your claim, you need to back it up. No-one has to provide any evidence to prove you wrong if you yourself are too lazy to provide evidence. So go ahead and provide evidence first, then i will put in the effort to shoot you down.

    You think you can just provide baseless claims without any evidence and have others do the work? The burden is ON YOU to provide proof.. but you are too darn lazy.
     
    Last edited: May 19, 2019
  4. JakeStarkey

    JakeStarkey Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2016
    Messages:
    25,747
    Likes Received:
    9,526
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No, there is no evidence that you were a long time Democrat.

    You may have trashed some Pubs. They are trashable, yes.

    I don't have to back up anything, until you have real proof, which you have not posted.

    If you post such evidence, I still have the floor because I forced you to post it.
     
  5. Mike12

    Mike12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2012
    Messages:
    4,563
    Likes Received:
    2,891
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I did post the video of him making that conclusion, again you are too lazy too even look it up. Make some effort..
     
  6. JakeStarkey

    JakeStarkey Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2016
    Messages:
    25,747
    Likes Received:
    9,526
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No, Barr did not make that conclusion in the video.
     
  7. Mike12

    Mike12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2012
    Messages:
    4,563
    Likes Received:
    2,891
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No, burden is on you to back up your claim, otherwise you are a lazy person that can’t back up anything you post and want others to do the work.
     
  8. Mike12

    Mike12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2012
    Messages:
    4,563
    Likes Received:
    2,891
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Look it up..
     
  9. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You mean not charged. That is all a prosecutor does. Did you say you know the law? LOL
     
  10. Mike12

    Mike12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2012
    Messages:
    4,563
    Likes Received:
    2,891
    Trophy Points:
    113
    First there is the video of barr clearly stating him and rosenstein determined no evidence for obstruction, even CNN agrees this what barr’a conclusion.

    ‘Once he decided to insert himself, Barr reached what was a foregone conclusion given his history: no criminal obstruction. ‘ cnn

    And CNN is the cream of the crop news network for the left

    :)
     
    Last edited: May 19, 2019
  11. Mike12

    Mike12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2012
    Messages:
    4,563
    Likes Received:
    2,891
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Another trait of the redical left today. They make baseless claims and accusations but never back it up. Then they want the other side to do all the work and provide evidence to refute there one liner, lazy, baseless claims. The burden of proof is on the accuser, the one making the claims. They continue to expose themseves for who they are. The believers in ‘guilty until proven innocent’. What a party this has become!
     
    Last edited: May 19, 2019
  12. PrincipleInvestment

    PrincipleInvestment Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2016
    Messages:
    23,170
    Likes Received:
    16,477
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Hmmm ... sounds like it's more than just a hobby of yours ... per post, or per diem?
     
    Last edited: May 19, 2019
  13. JakeStarkey

    JakeStarkey Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2016
    Messages:
    25,747
    Likes Received:
    9,526
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This has been true for more than two years.

    Trump's attempt to make the unitary executive untouchable by the law continues to fail.

    [​IMG]
     
  14. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The report is the culmination of the evidence gathered in the investigation. The conclusion is that trump could not be cleared of any crime.

    Thems the facts. Sorry.
     
  15. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It’s written I perfectly plain English. The report specifically states the president is not exonerated. Lol.
     
  16. Mike12

    Mike12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2012
    Messages:
    4,563
    Likes Received:
    2,891
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Wrong. Barr is head of DOJ and he concluded no obstruction. End of it. Go ahead and tell us how you disagree with Barr, what Trump puppet he is.. but he did make that conclusion. Fact
     
    Last edited: May 19, 2019
  17. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Because prosecutors never exonerate so duh!
     
  18. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Uh, it is a demonstrable fact. lol.


    Nope.
     
  19. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No, because there was insufficient evidence to clear him. And yes, prosecutors exonerate all the time. They are specifically required to provide any exculpatory evidence they find in the course of their investigation to the accused/defense.
     
  20. Mike12

    Mike12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2012
    Messages:
    4,563
    Likes Received:
    2,891
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I showed you proof, you haven’t refuted it. Barr stated it publicly. Even CNN agrees:

    ‘Once he decided to insert himself, Barr reached what was a foregone conclusion given his history: no criminal obstruction. ‘ cnn
     
    Last edited: May 19, 2019
  21. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yeah, that’s called no charges. That’s how that works, duh!
     
  22. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The mueller report is perfectly clear. It specifically states he is not cleared of any crime. Lol
     
  23. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You mean Barr and Rosenstein and as testified the OLC opinion was not considered. CNN opinion is not fact.
     
  24. Mike12

    Mike12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2012
    Messages:
    4,563
    Likes Received:
    2,891
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Prosecutors never exonerate, they either charge or not. That was a political statement.
     
  25. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No charges means no charges for crimes. What do you think a prosecutors job is?
     
    Last edited: May 19, 2019

Share This Page